Blackout Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 A theoretical question here: if you gave Herm Edwards the 2004 Patriots, and Bill Belichick the 2004 Jets, and made these teams play eachother 15 times, who would win? (i chose an odd number of games so there couldn't be a tie) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted May 21, 2005 Author Share Posted May 21, 2005 A theoretical question here: if you gave Herm Edwards the 2004 Patriots, and Bill Belichick the 2004 Jets, and made these teams play eachother 15 times, who would win? (i chose an odd number of games so there couldn't be a tie) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 The Pats would win every game under Herm. Belichek would resign before coaching a game in NY. He is funny that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 The Pats would win every game under Herm. Belichek would resign before coaching a game in NY. He is funny that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 Belichek would resign before coaching a game in NY. He is funny that way. That is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 Belichek would resign before coaching a game in NY. He is funny that way. That is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gg Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 The Pats would win every game under Herm. Belichek would resign before coaching a game in NY. He is funny that way. excellent oh weblord! and you know without coaching a game ...bellyache would come out richer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gg Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 The Pats would win every game under Herm. Belichek would resign before coaching a game in NY. He is funny that way. excellent oh weblord! and you know without coaching a game ...bellyache would come out richer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormshadow19 Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 excellent oh weblord! and you know without coaching a game ...bellyache would come out richer And he'd steal Max's lunch money. Cause, how else is he going to afford those sharp threads? :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormshadow19 Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 excellent oh weblord! and you know without coaching a game ...bellyache would come out richer And he'd steal Max's lunch money. Cause, how else is he going to afford those sharp threads? :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gg Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 And he'd steal Max's lunch money. Cause, how else is he going to afford those sharp threads? :wink: yes those dolce and gabbana hoodie sweatshirts are real expensive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gg Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 And he'd steal Max's lunch money. Cause, how else is he going to afford those sharp threads? :wink: yes those dolce and gabbana hoodie sweatshirts are real expensive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kentucky Jet Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 Bellyache would win many more games then HERM! He is a leader who runs his team. HERM is cheerleader who lets his coordinators do as they please. hence, JORDAN is a RAIDER because the gutless one did not stand up to HACKETT when he should have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kentucky Jet Posted May 21, 2005 Share Posted May 21, 2005 Bellyache would win many more games then HERM! He is a leader who runs his team. HERM is cheerleader who lets his coordinators do as they please. hence, JORDAN is a RAIDER because the gutless one did not stand up to HACKETT when he should have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted May 22, 2005 Author Share Posted May 22, 2005 hence, JORDAN is a RAIDER because the gutless one did not stand up to HACKETT when he should have. considering Curtis had 1700 yards last year, I think thats a bad example of hackett hating probably the only bad example of it too, since he was still such a sh*thead with utilizing other players (ie WRs and TEs) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted May 22, 2005 Author Share Posted May 22, 2005 hence, JORDAN is a RAIDER because the gutless one did not stand up to HACKETT when he should have. considering Curtis had 1700 yards last year, I think thats a bad example of hackett hating probably the only bad example of it too, since he was still such a sh*thead with utilizing other players (ie WRs and TEs) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.