Jump to content

Pat Neshek needs your HELP!!!!


NYJETS3233

Recommended Posts

Okajima has pitched more late inning pressure situations with runners on than Neshek and has a ERA over 2 full runs better in those situations. He has also pitched more late inning close games in total with better stats.

Neshek is good but "inventing" numbers because you hate the Sox is childish.

You're wrong as usual. In "Close and Late" situations Neshek has faced 135 batters and Okajima has faced 94. Neshek has also faced 4 times the number of batters in Tie games as Okajima has.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You're wrong as usual. In "Close and Late" situations Neshek has faced 135 batters and Okajima has faced 94. Neshek has also faced 4 times the number of batters in Tie games as Okajima has.

Will you at least admit that the Red Sox are a better team, and that's why Okajima has fewer chances?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're wrong as usual. In "Close and Late" situations Neshek has faced 135 batters and Okajima has faced 94. Neshek has also faced 4 times the number of batters in Tie games as Okajima has.

Number of batters faced is a product of extending the inning via allowing hits or walks.....see ERA in close and late runners on etc. Bottom line: Okajima has thrown more innings during late pressure and more innings during late inning pressure with runners on. As for batters faced close and late ;http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=okajihi01&year=2007

Okajima also has a better ERA in BOTH those situations.

Okajima

http://2001ball.baseball.sportsline.com/players/player/breakdown/1179735

Neshek

http://2001ball.baseball.sportsline.com/players/player/breakdown/549738

Neshek has also allowed more HR's than Okajima's in close and late situations .

Both are good pitchers but to date this season I'll take Okajima.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number of batters faced is a product of extending the inning via allowing hits or walks.....see ERA in close and late runners on etc. Bottom line: Okajima has thrown more innings during late pressure and more innings during late inning pressure with runners on. As for batters faced close and late ;http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=okajihi01&year=2007

Okajima also has a better ERA in BOTH those situations.

Okajima

http://2001ball.baseball.sportsline.com/players/player/breakdown/1179735

Neshek

http://2001ball.baseball.sportsline.com/players/player/breakdown/549738

Neshek has also allowed more HR's than Okajima's in close and late situations .

Both are good pitchers but to date this season I'll take Okajima.

Whoops!

Where'd he go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number of batters faced is a product of extending the inning via allowing hits or walks.....see ERA in close and late runners on etc. Bottom line: Okajima has thrown more innings during late pressure and more innings during late inning pressure with runners on. As for batters faced close and late ;http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=okajihi01&year=2007

Okajima also has a better ERA in BOTH those situations.

Okajima

http://2001ball.baseball.sportsline.com/players/player/breakdown/1179735

Neshek

http://2001ball.baseball.sportsline.com/players/player/breakdown/549738

Neshek has also allowed more HR's than Okajima's in close and late situations .

Both are good pitchers but to date this season I'll take Okajima.

What are you talking about "more innings." Neshek has clearly been inserted into more close and late situations than Okajima. Neshek has faced MANY more batters in those situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you talking about "more innings." Neshek has clearly been inserted into more close and late situations than Okajima. Neshek has faced MANY more batters in those situations.

Check baseball reference.com....check CBS. Okajima has more innings, faced more batters and better stats in those situations.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=neshepa01&year=2007

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=okajihi01&year=2007

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neshek comes in with the bases empty and gives up a 2 run shot. The 7th HR he has given up this year.

I think its an understatement to say that with the All-Star vote in balloting ending in 90 minutes this probably wasn't a good time to give up a 2 run HR in a tie game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people still debate with madmike? I really don't understand why you even bother. He's obviously right all the time so there's no need to doubt him. But seriously, all you get out of arguing with madmike is absurd spin where stats mean everything, but only the ones that help his argument, and then when you dare to disagree with him you get accused of stalking and some such nonsense. Just don't even bother with the guy.

And anyway Neshek just gave up a game-winning hr to Matsui which I'm guessing isn't going to help his all-star voting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be on the lookout for the twins to release Neshek after that homer.

All you have is sarcasm?

Neshek has had a fine season thus far but giving up 7 HR's isn't a good thing.

Neshek came in with the bases empty in a tied game and gave up a 2 run homer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All you have is sarcasm?

Neshek has had a fine season thus far but giving up 7 HR's isn't a good thing.

Neshek came in with the bases empty in a tied game and gave up a 2 run homer.

Okajima got bombed the last time the yankees saw him too. That happens to relievers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okajima got bombed the last time the yankees saw him too. That happens to relievers...

If you want to talk bombs then your man Neshek is the guy to talk to.

Way to bring up a game from June 3rd when Okajima blew a save (his one and only).

How about you talk about Nesheck giving up the game winning runs (both HR's) for the 2nd time in two weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to talk bombs then your man Neshek is the guy to talk to.

Way to bring up a game from June 3rd when Okajima blew a save (his one and only).

How about you talk about Nesheck giving up the game winning runs (both HR's) for the 2nd time in two weeks?

I like how any player i try to defend against a boston play is "my boy."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how any player i try to defend against a boston play is "my boy."

This has nothing to do with Boston and you have been Neshek's biggest cheerleader in this thread so I consider him "your boy."

You dismissed Okajima's superior numbers in favour of Nesheck for some strange reason.

If I'm such a Boston homer why did I say that Arod deserves to win the MVP this year in another thread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has nothing to do with Boston and you have been Neshek's biggest cheerleader in this thread so I consider him "your boy."

You dismissed Okajima's superior numbers in favour of Nesheck for some strange reason.

If I'm such a Boston homer why did I say that Arod deserves to win the MVP this year in another thread?

Because Arod is a complete no brainer. As for this thread he doesn't have clearly better numbers or I never would've posted here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No he doesn't.

Neshek doesn't need help as the thread suggests but you do.

You have been smoked in the Reyes and Neshek threads but remain infantile on the matter. All players discussed in both threads are good but you simply made bogus statements and were statistically (your passion BTW) proved wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neshek doesn't need help as the thread suggests but you do.

You have been smoked in the Reyes and Neshek threads but remain infantile on the matter. All players discussed in both threads are good but you simply made bogus statements and were statistically (your passion BTW) proved wrong.

You are the one who posted links that didn't say the things you said they did but apparently I'VE been proved wrong LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...