Jump to content

Belichick comments on ruling


K2C

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No apology to the jets of course.

Did you expect one? Especially with the bad blood between the two teams? Plus the fact that he doesn't seem to think he did anything really wrong, just "interpreted a rule the wrong way" and that adds up to no apology. Though, I do think that maybe you should have gotten one, even if he didn't mean it (and you know he wouldn't actually mean it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you expect one? Especially with the bad blood between the two teams? Plus the fact that he doesn't seem to think he did anything really wrong, just "interpreted a rule the wrong way" and that adds up to no apology. Though, I do think that maybe you should have gotten one, even if he didn't mean it (and you know he wouldn't actually mean it)
He's such a scumbag that he couldn't even come up with a fake apology.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you expect one? Especially with the bad blood between the two teams? Plus the fact that he doesn't seem to think he did anything really wrong, just "interpreted a rule the wrong way" and that adds up to no apology. Though, I do think that maybe you should have gotten one, even if he didn't mean it (and you know he wouldn't actually mean it)

How does he interpret the rule the wrong way when a letter was written to all 32 franchises last year telling them not to do this. This is a complete **** statement, I hope BB dies a horrible death. He's honestly scum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does he interpret the rule the wrong way when a letter was written to all 32 franchises last year telling them not to do this. This is a complete **** statement, I hope BB dies a horrible death. He's honestly scum.

I'm thinking that the next time someone on this board gets pulled over they should use this as an excuse just to see what happens. Then just tell the judge that the NFL bought it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does he interpret the rule the wrong way when a letter was written to all 32 franchises last year telling them not to do this. This is a complete **** statement, I hope BB dies a horrible death. He's honestly scum.

It was all in the wording "to be used to gain a competitive advantage during the course of the game"

He claims he doesn't use it during the game its filmed, but rather as a coaching tool for later use, thus not in violation.

Don't shoot me, I'm just telling you what he says.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does he interpret the rule the wrong way when a letter was written to all 32 franchises last year telling them not to do this. This is a complete **** statement, I hope BB dies a horrible death. He's honestly scum.

Ice...The NFL issued a statement on September 6th..of THIS YEAR..as in 7 days ago..to ALL 32 NFL teams reminding them not to do anything illegal such as this. Forget last year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was all in the wording "to be used to gain a competitive advantage during the course of the game"

He claims he doesn't use it during the game its filmed, but rather as a coaching tool for later use, thus not in violation.

Don't shoot me, I'm just telling you what he says.....

You cant video tape on the sidelines... it is illegal regardless... thats why he was fined... DUH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cant video tape on the sidelines... it is illegal regardless... thats why he was fined... DUH

Yes, that is the rule, however he's arguing the wording that states that it would be used for the game in which it is filmed. I'm not arguing the point, that is his arguement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...