Lady Jet Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Ok, as you know, one of our own is being called out. The particular sister in question by the evil brotherhood, is a Pats fan. She was not here to take her lumps from Jets fans and the brotherhood is very upset. However, I am now aware that one of the brothers was also missing. Yeah, yeah, getting married, honeymooning, whatever. He still was not here and was not exposed to the hoards of delusional Pats fans. So I was wondering, do we apply the action noted in Section 88, 304B? Or would Section 12, 15C be more appropriate? Please let me know, ASAP. Thanks, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Ok, as you know, one of our own is being called out. The particular sister in question by the evil brotherhood, is a Pats fan. She was not here to take her lumps from Jets fans and the brotherhood is very upset. However, I am now aware that one of the brothers was also missing. Yeah, yeah, getting married, honeymooning, whatever. He still was not here and was not exposed to the hoards of delusional Pats fans. So I was wondering, do we apply the action noted in Section 88, 304B? Or would Section 12, 15C be more appropriate? Please let me know, ASAP. Thanks, I didnt think the sisterhood used sections and paragraph notations,, I thought they named sections after fashion designers or ice cream flavors,,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Ok, as you know, one of our own is being called out. The particular sister in question by the evil brotherhood, is a Pats fan. She was not here to take her lumps from Jets fans and the brotherhood is very upset. However, I am now aware that one of the brothers was also missing. Yeah, yeah, getting married, honeymooning, whatever. He still was not here and was not exposed to the hoards of delusional Pats fans. So I was wondering, do we apply the action noted in Section 88, 304B? Or would Section 12, 15C be more appropriate? Please let me know, ASAP. Thanks, huh??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Ok, as you know, one of our own is being called out. The particular sister in question by the evil brotherhood, is a Pats fan. She was not here to take her lumps from Jets fans and the brotherhood is very upset. However, I am now aware that one of the brothers was also missing. Yeah, yeah, getting married, honeymooning, whatever. He still was not here and was not exposed to the hoards of delusional Pats fans. So I was wondering, do we apply the action noted in Section 88, 304B? Or would Section 12, 15C be more appropriate? Please let me know, ASAP. Thanks, you should mobilize whichever of those sections applies to cat fights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tictac Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Ok, as you know, one of our own is being called out. The particular sister in question by the evil brotherhood, is a Pats fan. She was not here to take her lumps from Jets fans and the brotherhood is very upset. However, I am now aware that one of the brothers was also missing. Yeah, yeah, getting married, honeymooning, whatever. He still was not here and was not exposed to the hoards of delusional Pats fans. So I was wondering, do we apply the action noted in Section 88, 304B? Or would Section 12, 15C be more appropriate? Please let me know, ASAP. Thanks, Probally section 12, 15C. But first, you should probally tell everyone what it means. So we, i mean they, can all know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Probally section 12, 15C. But first, you should probally tell everyone what it means. So we, i mean they, can all know. And, then, you should teach the sisterhood how to spell "probably." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 And, then, you should teach the sisterhood how to spell "probably." This has been another lesson on english with "Boob" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Ok, as you know, one of our own is being called out. The particular sister in question by the evil brotherhood, is a Pats fan. She was not here to take her lumps from Jets fans and the brotherhood is very upset. However, I am now aware that one of the brothers was also missing. Yeah, yeah, getting married, honeymooning, whatever. He still was not here and was not exposed to the hoards of delusional Pats fans. So I was wondering, do we apply the action noted in Section 88, 304B? Or would Section 12, 15C be more appropriate? Please let me know, ASAP. Thanks, You have forgotten amendement 201 to section 12, 15C - which states that marrying a person with a passion for turd makes absences okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 You have forgotten amendement 201 to section 12, 15C - which states that marrying a person with a passion for turd makes absences okay. I prefer Section 9((ii) of the JN Bylaws, which states that posting pics of women is acceptable as long as there is no pornographic nudity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 This has been another lesson on english with "Boob" "English" should be capitalized. You fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 "English" should be capitalized. You fail. damnit, don't send my report card home, i'll make sure my dad gets it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 I prefer Section 9((ii) of the JN Bylaws, which states that posting pics of women is acceptable as long as there is no pornographic nudity. LOL!!! Always pushing the envelope. Same passive-aggressive behavior exhibited by your buddy, Bill Belichick. Hmmmmmmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 I stay within the rules- belicheat cheats, lies, steals, commits adultery, dresses like a homeless person and is otherwise dishonorable. And i am posting these especially for you, since i know how much you enjoy them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Like I said, a bit like Bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.