Maxman Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Compiling isn't as easy as we have been led to believe. I'm just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Where ya at Smizzy, Troll and Sperm? Ya boy is hurt because he cannot handle the load. Justin Fargas didn't do too bad behind that horrible Offensive Line eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Where ya at Smizzy, Troll and Sperm? Ya boy is hurt because he cannot handle the load. Justin Fargas didn't do too bad behind that horrible Offensive Line eh? Justin Fargas I forgot that f'n name. He almost had me ****ting my pants on New years eve. Well that and Joe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Where ya at Smizzy, Troll and Sperm? Ya boy is hurt because he cannot handle the load. Justin Fargas didn't do too bad behind that horrible Offensive Line eh? It's not even a serious injury. He'll be in the backfield to start the game in two weeks when the Raiders come off of their bye. You are horribly wrong on Lamont. I just wonder how long you'll stick to your guns about your other predictions if they go as wrong as this one. 5 years from now, if Kellen Clemens sucks as much ass as Chad does, I wonder if you will play the role of Kellen's ecurb. BTW, the "three game wonder" had 70 yards in less than a half, and was on his way to his fourth straight big game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Horribly wrong? Yes I'm horribly wrong on a guy who in two seasons in Oakland has been hurt and the one year he ran for 1000 he just barely made it and now, guess what, he's hurt AGAIN! He may not be back in time for Week 6, and plus, by then, Dominic Rhodes will be back. There goes LaMont's carries. Back to what he needs to succeed and to stay healthy over a full season, 10 carries a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Horribly wrong? Yes I'm horribly wrong on a guy who in two seasons in Oakland has been hurt and the one year he ran for 1000 he just barely made it and now, guess what, he's hurt AGAIN! He may not be back in time for Week 6, and plus, by then, Dominic Rhodes will be back. There goes LaMont's carries. Back to what he needs to succeed and to stay healthy over a full season, 10 carries a game. Why the **** would Dominic Rhodes take all of Lamont's carries? Do you seriously believe that **** you just posted? Rhodes sucked in Indianapolis. 3.4 yards a carry last season. He's garbage. So, they are going to give him the starting role when he comes back from his suspension for being a drunk and take the job from a guy that's averaging 5 yards a pop? That makes a lot of sense. About as much sense as the Jets keeping broken down Curtis Martin and letting LaMonster go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Why the **** would Dominic Rhodes take all of Lamont's carries? Do you seriously believe that **** you just posted? Rhodes sucked in Indianapolis. 3.4 yards a carry last season. He's garbage. So, they are going to give him the starting role when he comes back from his suspension for being a drunk and take the job from a guy that's averaging 5 yards a pop? That makes a lot of sense. About as much sense as the Jets keeping broken down Curtis Martin and letting LaMonster go. Rhodes, Jordan and Fargas will all be splitting the carries in Oakland because Kiffin is not dumb. LaMont Jordan is most effective carrying the ball 10 times a game, not 20-25. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Rhodes, Jordan and Fargas will all be splitting the carries in Oakland because Kiffin is not dumb. LaMont Jordan is most effective carrying the ball 10 times a game, not 20-25. Lamont Jordan has received 20+ carries in a game 10 times in his career. In those ten games, he rushed for 1,064 yards. My math could be a little faulty, but that's about 100 yards a game when he gets fed the ball. Do some research. If you want to be a journalist, you can't just talk out of your ass. Your columns will be a regular feature at FireJoeMorgan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Lamont Jordan has received 20+ carries in a game 10 times in his career. In those ten games, he rushed for 1,064 yards. My math could be a little faulty, but that's about 100 yards a game when he gets fed the ball. Do some research. If you want to be a journalist, you can't just talk out of your ass. Your columns will be a regular feature at FireJoeMorgan. Sorry to say bro, but you're out of line here. You yourself do some research. The guy is getting hurt now that he is handling such big loads which further proves he cannot carry the ball 20-25 times a game without risk of injury. This happens to bigger backs. Most bigger backs cannot handle that type of load over the course of a full season or seasons. LaMont Jordan is still at his best running 10-15 times at most a game. He is no 20-25 carry a game back. He will get hurt. This spew from you wouldn't even be spewing right now if it weren't for three games against Detroit, Denver and Cleveland. Obviously three of the best defenses in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasonJet Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Lamont Jordan is a hell of a lot better than Dominic Rhodes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Lamont Jordan is a hell of a lot better than Dominic Rhodes. They both arn't things to brag about. In his two seasons of starting Jordan has averaged 3.8 ypc. So far through this year, three games, he has an average of 5.0. He will not keep it up and will lose carries to Fargas and Rhodes when they return from the Bye Week. If Justin Fargas can run for 100+, anyone can for Oakland. LaMont's fast impressive start is no longer as impressive after seeing what Fargas did yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Sorry to say bro, but you're out of line here. You yourself do some research. The guy is getting hurt now that he is handling such big loads which further proves he cannot carry the ball 20-25 times a game without risk of injury. This happens to bigger backs. Most bigger backs cannot handle that type of load over the course of a full season or seasons. LaMont Jordan is still at his best running 10-15 times at most a game. He is no 20-25 carry a game back. He will get hurt. This spew from you wouldn't even be spewing right now if it weren't for three games against Detroit, Denver and Cleveland. Obviously three of the best defenses in the NFL. It doesn't prove ****. He sure had no problem carrying the load in 2005. He got hurt last year; it's the NFL...injuries happen. But you are ****ting on him for an injury that will, in total, cause him to miss a little over two quarters. He's not a 10 carry a game back. He's a bruiser. Scat-backs are ten carry a game guys, bruisers get better as the game goes along and the defense gets worn down. You're gonna talk to me about defenses? You, the giant Curtis Martin fan, are going to bash Lamont for destroying ****ty defenses? Curtis Martin, the guy who made a Hall of Fame career out of feasting on the weak and never showed up in a big spot or when the Jets played a top run defense? This spew from you wouldn't be happening if you didn't have your head jammed up C-Mart's anal cavity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Whatever you want to believe about the #4 rusher of all-time dude is your own problem. If you think all he did was run well against **** teams well then I guess the Pats and Jets played a ton of **** teams from 1995 through 2005. Damn. Why didn't we let the coaching staffs know about this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 2005: Martin + Houston = 1,037 yards, 7 TD 2006: Barlow + Washington = 1,020 yards, 10 TD Jordan '05: 1,025 yards, 9 TD Jordan '06: 434 yards, 2 TD I mean, I'm just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Curtis Martin = Most overrated "underrated RB" ever. LaMont for 1 game is better than Curtis Martin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 Damn. Why didn't we let the coaching staffs know about this? We tried. But all circuits were busy. Apparently they were being overloaded with Chad Pennington feedback. Please everyone be more selective when contacting the Jets. This way we can avoid issues like this going forward. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasonJet Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 They both arn't things to brag about. In his two seasons of starting Jordan has averaged 3.8 ypc. So far through this year, three games, he has an average of 5.0. He will not keep it up and will lose carries to Fargas and Rhodes when they return from the Bye Week. If Justin Fargas can run for 100+, anyone can for Oakland. LaMont's fast impressive start is no longer as impressive after seeing what Fargas did yesterday. Maybe because he was on probably the worst offense in football? Also Miami's run defense is pretty terrible which partially explains it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Curtis Martin = Most overrated "underrated RB" ever. LaMont for 1 game is better than Curtis Martin. Wow, just, wow. This doesn't even deserve a comment it is so wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Maybe because he was on probably the worst offense in football? Also Miami's run defense is pretty terrible which partially explains it. Kenton Keith (who?) terrorized Denver's run defense as well on Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 2005: Martin + Houston = 1,037 yards, 7 TD 2006: Barlow + Washington = 1,020 yards, 10 TD Jordan '05: 1,025 yards, 9 TD Jordan '06: 434 yards, 2 TD I mean, I'm just sayin'. 100 yard games, 2005-2007: Lamont Jordan: 6 Curtis Martin: 1 Touchdowns, 2005-2007: Lamont Jordan: 15 Curtis Martin: 5 Receptions/receiving yards, 2005-2007: Lamont Jordan: 92/765 Curtis Martin: 24/118 Yards per carry, 2005-2007: Lamont Jordan: 4.0 Curtis Martin: 3.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 So we're putting up Martin's 12 games with no cartiledge to Jordan's 25? Nice. Those are accurate. This is ridiculous. Next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Wow, just, wow. This doesn't even deserve a comment it is so wrong. Martin never stepped up in the big games for us. Fact. LaMont did more on 1 carry vs the chargers than Martin did the whole freakin game. Martin is the HOF RB version of Chad Pennington, only slightly better. Both crumble in big games, arent very talented, but compile numbers that make them look better than they really are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 So we're putting up Martin's 12 games with no cartiledge to Jordan's 25? Nice. Those are accurate. This is ridiculous. Next. The point is Martin was done after 2004. In 2005, he should have been in another uniform, not Lamont. Lamont >>>> Thomas Jones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Martin never stepped up in the big games for us. Fact. LaMont did more on 1 carry vs the chargers than Martin did the whole freakin game. Martin is the HOF RB version of Chad Pennington, only slightly better. Both crumble in big games, arent very talented, but compile numbers that make them look better than they really are. Incorrect. He didn't have the greatest game of his career in '98 against Denver, but who did? In Pittsburgh in '04, they were putting 9 in the box because they knew Pennington was not going deep. That loss is way, way more on Mr.Pennington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 The point is Martin was done after 2004. In 2005, he should have been in another uniform, not Lamont. Lamont >>>> Thomas Jones. The man had a career year in 2004, do you expect him to retire or do you expect him to think he can continue to do it for a few more years? LaMont Jordan has proven nothing and from '05-present Jones' stats still blow Jordan's out of the water despite the start of this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Incorrect. He didn't have the greatest game of his career in '98 against Denver, but who did? In Pittsburgh in '04, they were putting 9 in the box because they knew Pennington was not going deep. That loss is way, way more on Mr.Pennington. LaMont had no trouble with the Steelers defense that game. 6 ypc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 LaMont had no trouble with the Steelers defense that game. 6 ypc. Yeah in the 4th quarter after Curtis had worn them down. What are you madmike tonight? Keep on spinning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 Incorrect. He didn't have the greatest game of his career in '98 against Denver, but who did? In Pittsburgh in '04, they were putting 9 in the box because they knew Pennington was not going deep. That loss is way, way more on Mr.Pennington. haha blame the guy who played with a torn rotator cuff. That's awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 haha blame the guy who played with a torn rotator cuff. That's awesome. You shouldn't be playing if all you can do is conduct 3 points and want to use your injury as an excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 You shouldn't be playing if all you can do is conduct 3 points and want to use your injury as an excuse. 124 you are too much. Show me a quote where Chad ever used it as an excuse? It is the coaches job to pick who plays. My point that Chad said he could go even though he was in pain and was obviously limited. The coach decides who gives them the best shot to win. The world is not as black and white as your posts seem to indicate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 124 you are too much. Show me a quote where Chad ever used it as an excuse? It is the coaches job to pick who plays. My point that Chad said he could go even though he was in pain and was obviously limited. The coach decides who gives them the best shot to win. The world is not as black and white as your posts seem to indicate. I'm not saying Chad used it as an excuse, but it looked like you were and if Chad was so hurt he shouldn't have played. I don't care how limited you are, putting up 3 points is pathetic. You have to do more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 I'm not saying Chad used it as an excuse, but it looked like you were and if Chad was so hurt he shouldn't have played. I don't care how limited you are, putting up 3 points is pathetic. You have to do more than that. Actually you indicated that Chad used it as an excuse: You shouldn't be playing if all you can do is conduct 3 points and want to use your injury as an excuse. The Steelers were the better team. This is not really news. The Jets couldn't run. They couldn't pass. Donnie Henderson put together a great game plan on defense and Santana Moss kept it close on special teams. But the entire offense was lousy that day. Not just Chad. Not just Curtis. Everyone. The offensive line lost the battle in the trenches. Blaming one player really makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 I did not say in any part of that post that Chad Pennington said he was using his injury for an excuse. Although, ya know, it is strange how the part that it was a torn rotator cuff didn't come out until after that game Chad. Yeah yeah yeah, you don't want other teams to know, whatever, I'm sure they could tell things were wrong by watching the things called game tapes. The Quarterback is the man who should be able to conduct points. 3 points is pathetic and that falls on the Quarterback the most. That is the way it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 The man had a career year in 2004, do you expect him to retire or do you expect him to think he can continue to do it for a few more years? I didn't know Curtis Martin was in the front office. I didn't know it was Curtis Martin's decision that the Jets should keep himself, rather the younger, better Lamont Jordan. That makes me start to dislike Curtis Martin. What an *******. As for Thomas Jones, the guy has twice the amount of career carries as LaMonster, and only 2,500 more yards. Lamont is also a better receiver and goal-line back. Thomas Jones defines average. Lamont is above average, not great, just like #28. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 Can we get back on topic? Lamont can't compile. He sucks at compiling..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.