fatcatxl Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 why is everyone on the nuts of Andrews and Gay? Yeah what we have right now isn't great but there are better lineman out there, and I'd rather keep dyson over gay. Someone enlighten me, while i go play some madden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 why is everyone on the nuts of Andrews and Gay? Yeah what we have right now isn't great but there are better lineman out there, and I'd rather keep dyson over gay. Someone enlighten me, while i go play some madden. Gay is better than Dyson. Also getting Gay means the Pats won't have him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 Gay is better than Dyson. Also getting Gay means the Pats won't have him. The name Gay and Pats seem synonymous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 why is everyone on the nuts of Andrews and Gay? Yeah what we have right now isn't great but there are better lineman out there, and I'd rather keep dyson over gay. Someone enlighten me, while i go play some madden. Have you ever watched stacy andrews play?? THe reason people are "all over his nuts" is A) He can play both positions on the offensive line that we need help at; LG and RT. He started in replace of willie andrews an allpro RT and didn't miss a beat, he helped lead the way to an Oline that produce very few sacks in Cinci C) HE IS 6'7 342 and ran a 4.9 40. D) He is still learning the position...His first year he played football was his senior year in college. He has great footwork for a man his size. He is a ton better than Max starx who also has size and is very young. F) Our FO brought him in prior to this season as a RFA, but didn't sign him, which shows that have good talent eval and will probably make a push for him. The question i need to ask is, If you've seen him play how can you not be all over his nuts. As for gay; he is a quality #2, he knows our defense well and won't cost as much. Everyone always wants to make a push for the elite players, which is nice if we are a player or two from winning the SB, but we aren't. Also, the cap ramifications of signing such high priced free agents; it leaves less money for us to extend rhodes, less money to sign draft picks etc. Also, if we sign a lot of the high priced free agents and extend rhodes we probably will be extremely close ot being over the cap, which tanny will never do. A good cap specialist always leaves a few mill under the cap so that if god forbid a key player gets hurt we have the money to sign someone else or trade etc. Gay isn't the best corner out there, but he is a solid #2 and it's not a team of superstars that always wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 The name Gay and Pats seem synonymous. Haha it's funny cuase it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed3 Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 I think we need to have two #1 CBs if we want to stay competive in our division. Revis is obviously our best CB right now, which is sad because he's only played professional ball for one season (not including TC)... I would like to see the team make a push for another high quality cornerback. Samuel, Trufant, Asomugha.... not Gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.