Favorite_Toon Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10656336/2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed3 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Informative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10656336/2 What is interesting??? Prisco is a moron!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOExcusesNYJ Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 stupid article....thanks for telling us what we know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted February 21, 2008 Author Share Posted February 21, 2008 stupid article....thanks for telling us what we know You already know what? That was an article on the prospects for the draft and someones elses opinion... so whats wrong with that? oh im norry you are al scouts..I forgot.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 You already know what? That was an article on the prospects for the draft and someones elses opinion... so whats wrong with that? oh im norry you are al scouts..I forgot.. No one's claiming to be a scout but Pete Prisco is just about the worst analyst ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOExcusesNYJ Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 No one's claiming to be a scout but Pete Prisco is just about the worst analyst ever. agreed. just awful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed3 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Thanks a lot guys. I was hoping to keep up the one word response. In the future Toon, can we "title" better. I shouldn't feel tricked into reading articles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Matt Ryan at 6 ??.......No Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted February 21, 2008 Author Share Posted February 21, 2008 stupid article....thanks for telling us what we know Matt Ryan at 6 ??.......No Thanks Yeah thats because we have a great Qb already... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Yeah thats because we have a great Qb already... Listen guy, you have no idea how good clemens can be or can't be. You keep ragging on clemens for not being our QB, but he hasn't had a full offseason to play with the first team, a good Oline or having healthy wide receivers. Even as moronic as prisco is, i'm sure he'd agree that the end half of a season isn't enough time to evaluate a quarterback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Yeah thats because we have a great Qb already...We Do...Kellen with a Good line will throw for 4,000 yds with no problem. Kellen is not chad ,he can actully throw down field and throw on the run ,unlike chad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted February 21, 2008 Author Share Posted February 21, 2008 We Do...Kellen with a Good line will throw for 4,000 yds with no problem. Kellen is not chad ,he can actully throw down field and throw on the run ,unlike chad Look..I was the happiest MOFO when they benched Chad..I thought they waited too long... and im not saying that Kellen is not a good qb..but if we have a chance to draft another one..I say we do.. matt ryan? broem? Flacco? I would do that and have them compete for the spot... A little competition is always good.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Look..I was the happiest MOFO when they benched Chad..I thought they waited too long... and im not saying that Kellen is not a good qb..but if we have a chance to draft another one..I say we do.. matt ryan? broem? Flacco? I would do that and have them compete for the spot... A little competition is always good..I agree with you on a little competition, but don't we already have that with Ratliff?? why bring in another Qb in the top 10 and have to pay him top ten money when we really have bigger needs on this team .Drafting a Qb makes no sense to me ,and this is the reason everyone is raggin' prisco b/c he makes no sense with his mock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Matt Ryan at 6 ??.......No Thanks this isn't a mock draft. he's ranking the prospects in order of skill. i'd be happy with gholston, then we'd have harris and gholston at LB we could package vilma and coles for a true #1 WR (roy williams?) and some picks and then use the rest of our picks to solidify the lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 this isn't a mock draft. he's ranking the prospects in order of skill. i'd be happy with gholston, then we'd have harris and gholston at LB we could package vilma and coles for a true #1 WR (roy williams?) and some picks and then use the rest of our picks to solidify the lines. Oh I thought it was a mock draft,My bad , But I agree that if the Jets do not want to draft DMC or if the raiders take him first then Gholston has to be the way to go,we need a Lb anyway so why not grab him or wait till the second rd and grab Q.Groves and maybe grab and O-line or D-loine player with our 6 pick.Either way I pass on Matt Ryan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 this isn't a mock draft. he's ranking the prospects in order of skill. i'd be happy with gholston, then we'd have harris and gholston at LB we could package vilma and coles for a true #1 WR (roy williams?) and some picks and then use the rest of our picks to solidify the lines. Taking Gholston would not change Vilma's status. He's strictly an OLB and would take Hobson's spot. Vilma, Barton and Harris are the three ILBs and IIRC the cap savings if Barton is cut might make it worth keeping Vilma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Taking Gholston would not change Vilma's status. He's strictly an OLB and would take Hobson's spot. Vilma, Barton and Harris are the three ILBs and IIRC the cap savings if Barton is cut might make it worth keeping Vilma. i realize that. i want vilma gone either way. they are mutually-exclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted February 21, 2008 Author Share Posted February 21, 2008 this isn't a mock draft. he's ranking the prospects in order of skill. i'd be happy with gholston, then we'd have harris and gholston at LB we could package vilma and coles for a true #1 WR (roy williams?) and some picks and then use the rest of our picks to solidify the lines. If what you say went that way... I would love it... I am the biggest supporter of DMC..but ya know...what you say would be very good.. and I would be happy.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 We Do...Kellen with a Good line will throw for 4,000 yds with no problem. Kellen is not chad ,he can actully throw down field and throw on the run ,unlike chad Ryan Leaf could throw downfield. Just sayin it means nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 i realize that. i want vilma gone either way. they are mutually-exclusive. Well, not completely exclusive. Getting Gholston and trading Vilma would make you happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Well, not completely exclusive. Getting Gholston and trading Vilma would make you happy. lol that's true don't forget getting rid of coles too and getting a stud WR and solidifying the lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUM-KNEE Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Well, not completely exclusive. Getting Gholston and trading Vilma would make you happy. I would be happy with that too. Man I hate the dead time before the draft.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.