Jetlag Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 27cxAs7mGSs O7OiYXlBEZU This guy is going to be the better pro. In fact we might want to think about taking him at #6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 I personally have liked mendenhall better and would rather have him, but even though i like him more I still wouldn't want him with the 6th overall. I just don't like taking runningbacks in the top 15-20 normally, it's just so much money into a position where every year theres a handful of players who can come in and do the job. I would like to point out that i most likely wouldn't complain if we got either mcfadden or mendenhall, just not ecstatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 :ahhh::ahhh::ahhh::ahhh::ahhh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed3 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 If Gholston and Chris are both gone by six; I would have no problems trading down and picking up a RB like Mendenhall if it means we could also add a tier-2 OLB or a tier-1 CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 If Gholston and Chris are both gone by six; I would have no problems trading down and picking up a RB like Mendenhall if it means we could also add a tier-2 OLB or a tier-1 CB. No way in hell Gholston will be picked in the Top 5. He'll be there for us. I just want McFadden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 No way in hell Gholston will be picked in the Top 5. He'll be there for us. I just want McFadden. And why wouldn't he be picked in the top 5?? St. Louis and Oakland desperately need an edge rusher and C.long will most likely be gone with the first pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 Goulston(or Long, if he's there...but he wont be) in the 1st, Chris Johnson in Round 2 Just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 And why wouldn't he be picked in the top 5?? St. Louis and Oakland desperately need an edge rusher and C.long will most likely be gone with the first pick. The Rams are def not going to take Gholston when they have so much holes to fill like DT and OL. The Raiders won't take him either, they need McFadden or one of the Longs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 The Rams are def not going to take Gholston when they have so much holes to fill like DT and OL. The Raiders won't take him either, they need McFadden or one of the Longs. i think your right ghost, who ever we get at 6 will be a player that sholud make an impact, the brain trust cant screw this up can they OOOOOPS should not have said that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 Same for Mcfadden, I wouldn't complain if we took him. I'd be excited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyjet69 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 Same for Mcfadden, I wouldn't complain if we took him. I'd be excited. I wouldn't complain (well maybe a little) nor would I be excited. But I would root for him because he is a Jet! Other than that I want GHOLSTON!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 The Rams are def not going to take Gholston when they have so much holes to fill like DT and OL. The Raiders won't take him either, they need McFadden or one of the Longs. They dont need mcfadden... they signed fargus for three years... and if the falcons sign michael turner...welll they wont either, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 Mendenhall is a stud. Right now he is my guy at #6. Safest pick of any offensive player in the draft, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 The Rams are def not going to take Gholston when they have so much holes to fill like DT and OL. The Raiders won't take him either, they need McFadden or one of the Longs. Mendenhall is a stud. Right now he is my guy at #6. Safest pick of any offensive player in the draft, IMO. And you say that because? give me some intellugent reason why? I mean they have mcfadden as not the best rb in the draft but the best player!!! Best talent.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harts724 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 We definitely don`t need McFadden,we already have a game breaker in Leon Washington. Mcfadden is a good player in the open field as is Leon,McFadden is NOT and a repeat NOT a good runner in between the tackles. If we take a back it will be in the later rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.