Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2007 Draft could have had different look

John Murphy

? ASK THE EXPERT: Post a question for John Murphy

If teams knew then what they know now, obviously the first round of the 2007 NFL Draft would have turned out differently.

We know the Minnesota Vikings (Adrian Peterson) and Cleveland Browns (Joe Thomas) probably wouldn't change a thing. However, teams like Detroit, Miami, New Orleans and San Francisco likely would have selected different players.

The draft is a guessing game for several years after the fact. So, while it is hard to totally agree or disagree based solely on the performance of how the 32 rookies performed in Year One, it can be a sign of things to come.

613293.jpgspacer1.gifspacer1.gifThe Detroit Lions would have been a good home for eventual Pro Bowl MVP Adrian Peterson.Here is a look at what might have happened if a few teams could have seen a season into the future:

Team: Detroit Lions

Pick: No. 2 overall

Actual pick: Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech

Revised pick: Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma

Although Johnson showed the potential to be a No. 1 receiver in the league, the Lions still have plenty of depth at that position without him. The deal for running back Tatum Bell turned out to be awful, while injury-prone former starting back Kevin Jones has made the running back position a major question mark. The combination of Jon Kitna (QB), Roy Williams (WR) and Peterson would have provided the Lions with a much more diverse offense. Cap-wise, their money would be spread out among several positions. A case could also be made that the Lions would also have been better served taking offensive tackle Joe Thomas at No. 2. Thomas proved himself to be one of the game's top young offensive tackles, and that is now also a need area for the Lions. Peterson would have made this team much more of a factor in 2007 and beyond. Now, the Lions need to figure out how to stop Peterson twice a year for the next 10 or so seasons.

Team: Atlanta Falcons

Pick: No. 8

Actual pick: Jamaal Anderson, DE, Arkansas

Revised pick: Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame

The Falcons had dealt away backup quarterback Matt Schaub and were in the midst of dealing with the Michael Vick situation when their name came up on the clock. Now while I still expect defensive lineman Jamaal Anderson to jump up the ranks in his second year - much like the Texans' Mario Williams did in 2007 - you cannot say much for 30 tackles and zero sacks in 16 games as a rookie. More importantly, the Falcons still have no real identity on either side of the ball. Most evaluators did not think that Chris Redman would make it out of training camp, let alone recently get re-signed for $5 million dollars over the next two years. That tells you where the Falcons are at quarterback. If you give this pick back to Arthur Blank and the Falcons it is likely that they would have a hard time passing on former Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn. He had a higher grade on most teams' boards than Boston College's Matt Ryan does this season, and Quinn would have received quality playing time in the final month of the season. Now, the team will have to spend the 2008 campaign teaching a new system to a lesser-valued rookie quarterback.

Team: Miami Dolphins

Pick: No. 9

Actual pick: Ted Ginn, WR/KR, Ohio State

Revised pick: Patrick Willis, LB, Ole Miss

spacer1.gif613289.jpgspacer1.gifMiami may have been better off going a different direction than Ted Ginn.Where do we start with the Dolphins? Most analysts were penciling in the name Brady Quinn when the Dolphins hit the clock, only to be stunned by hearing Ginn's name. It is unlikely the Dolphins would have been a much better team in 2007, but they would have better options right now if they had gone for Quinn at No. 9 and come back in the third round (#71) and taken a receiver like James Jones, Jason Hill, Laurent Robinson or even Jacoby Jones. Ginn still has plenty of speed and return skills, but the new front office seems undecided on the fate of last year's second-round choice, John Beck. In fact, offensive lineman Samson Satele (2nd round) is one of the few early picks from last season that fits the new regime's style/schemes. In this scenario, Quinn is off the board to Atlanta at No. 8. I think in that case the Dolphins would have looked closely at Jamaal Anderson, who would now still be on the board. But after a tremendous rookie season, the most desired player on the board most likely would have been former Ole Miss linebacker Patrick Willis. One last point: While I have a higher grade overall on LSU's Glenn Dorsey, the age, upside and athleticism shown by defensive tackle Amobi Okoye also would have turned out to be a better decision at No. 9 since the Dolphins could still have come back with a quarterback in round two, a better receiver choice in the third and not come away with so many wasted choices.

Team: Pittsburgh Steelers

Pick: 15

Actual choice: Lawrence Timmons, LB, Florida State

Revised choice: Anthony Spencer, OLB/DE, Purdue

This one is a bit trickier, because the Steelers were not really sure what they would get out of James Harrison - who turned out to be a Pro Bowl selection in his first-year replacing veteran icon Joey Porter. Meanwhile, Timmons recorded just 13 tackles and now has to either change positions or play as a backup for several years. The Steelers came back in round two by adding versatile pass rusher LaMarr Woodley, who could replace Clark Haggans on the opposite side of Harrison. However, by doubling up at that spot they left themselves vulnerable at a few other positions (like cornerback, defensive end and offensive guard). The Steelers were well aware at last year's draft that Alan Faneca would likely be gone a year later. At No. 15, the Steelers could have added cornerback Aaron Ross - who helped solidify the Giants secondary. Ross could have easily replaced Ike Taylor at some point last season. Another option could have been offensive guard Ben Grubbs as a future replacement for Faneca. More of a long-range look at their draft would suggest the Steelers would have likely looked at Anthony Spencer to push Haggans. Then, they could have come back in round two with either inside linebacker David Harris or cornerback Eric Wright, both of whom fit their needs/schemes.

Team: New Orleans Saints

Pick: 27

Actual choice: Robert Meachem, WR, Tennessee

Revised choice: Chris Houston, CB, Arkansas

I gave the Denver Broncos a pass on Jarvis Moss because we haven't really been able to judge him fairly at this point. I could have elected to do the same here with the Saints and wide receiver Robert Meachem, but to me this was a greedy choice in the first place. The Saints had built a solid nucleus on the offensive side of the ball with Marques Colston, Devery Henderson, signing David Patten and knowing they had both Deuce McAllister and Reggie Bush healthy. The Saints just had to dish out almost $40 million dollars to sign cornerback Randall Gay and defensive end Bobby McCray, not exactly household names. By opting to go the safe route in the first-round of last year's draft, they would have been able to invest that money on one of the better interior defensive linemen that have been available the past week. Meachem clearly has upside if he can return to his pre-injury status, but he won't help cover opposing receivers or stuff the run. He is the team's No. 3 or No. 4 option overall ? at best ? because of the other offensive options. There are several options here that would now make sense. If they still wanted to improve the passing game, tight end Greg Olsen would have been a better choice. Defensively, massive defensive tackle Alan Branch would now provide them with a young run stuffer that does not exist on their current roster. The two defenders I would lean towards a year later would be cornerback Chris Houston, who was my personal favorite for them in my mock drafts a year ago, or linebacker Justin Durant. Even with the addition of Gay, the late season injury to starting cornerback Mike McKenzie could still see the Saints using either Fred Thomas or Jason David in key situations early in 2008. Houston or Durant would provide the team with improved athleticism and range in their back seven, something that has been lacking for years. Houston would have been the best choice because the Saints have not had a premier defensive back since Dave Waymer (1980-1989).

Team: San Francisco 49ers

Pick: No. 28

Actual choice: Joe Staley, OT, Central Michigan

Revised choice: Don't make trade with Patriots

This has less to do with the 49ers not being happy with the play of Staley ? who started all 16 games as a rookie - but more to do with the loss of a top-10 draft choice. The 49ers dealt their first round pick this year for the rights to take Staley at pick No. 28 last year. Admittedly, the 49ers expected to see advancement with their team. Some even made the Niners their dark horse choice to win the NFC West in 2007. Given his athleticism and upside, Staley could soon hold the value equal to a top-10 choice. However, at the time of the trade the 49ers front office did not believe they were dealing what would turn out to be the No. 7 overall choice in this year's draft.

613290.jpgspacer1.gifspacer1.gifHad San Diego known it would acquire receiver Chris Chambers the Chargers may have passed on Buster Davis in the first round.Team: San Diego Chargers

Pick: No. 30

Actual choice: Craig Davis, WR, LSU

Revised choice: Eric Weddle, DB, Utah

The in-season trade for former All-Pro wide receiver Chris Chambers obviously makes this an easy option for a replacement choice. Speedy wide receiver Craig Davis had only 20 catches for 188 yards. More importantly, the Chargers have other needs that they could have filled. They reached for a speed option at receiver at the end of the first round, then compounded that by trading up in the second round to select Weddle - who was the top defender on their board at this point of the draft. Without overhauling too many choices, the Chargers could have selected Weddle at No. 30 - just six picks before they made the trade up to get him. Given the move they made up from pick No. 62 to No. 37, the ideal player for them in the second round would have been linebacker David Harris. He proved to be a terrific inside linebacker in the Jets 3-4 scheme and would have given the Chargers a younger option instead of having to sign veteran free agent Derek Smith. The newly realigned Chargers would have Chambers as their No. 2 receiver, Harris starting at inside linebacker, Weddle still on the roster and the cap room to now replace cornerback Drayton Florence - who signed with the Jacksonville Jaguars.

Team: Chicago Bears

Pick: No. 31

Actual choice: Greg Olsen, TE, Miami

Revised choice: Kevin Kolb, QB, Houston There is no arguing the selection of Olsen. He was the most productive rookie tight end in recent memory, and gives them a great combination when paired with Desmond Clark. However, the Bears are devoid of skill position players across the board thanks to the loss of free agent Bernard Berrian to the Vikings and the release of veteran receiver Muhsin Muhammad. The fact that running back Cedric Benson has yet to prove himself as an every-down back in the NFL is also an issue. If you go one step further, the Bears are still planning to enter training camp with a quarterback battle of Rex Grossman vs. Kyle Orton. They combined to complete less than 55% of their passes with a collective 7:9 touchdown-to-interception ratio. The fact that the Bears are picking No. 14 one year after being in the Super Bowl clearly shows that choosing a quarterback of the future ? like former Houston standout Kevin Kolb - would have been better for the team's long-term success.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
More than half the draft is missing.

Also surprised to see no mention of McFadden.

Look I did my best at putting what they had.. and no..Im not al about Mcfadden..just saying I would like to have him on our team..

Ya know me and you and most if the other jets fans here are not much different.. were all like parents.. We both love the jets but have a different opinion what is best for them.. but we both have the same common goal and thats to win...

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

where are all the Greg Olsen lovers? or are they still hiding behind the injuries and that Chicago has no QB? I swear greg olsen and DMC had the same fan following from JN in the past two years, and each year those people pretend like they never wanted said player.

Reggie Bush anyone?

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
More than half the draft is missing.

Also surprised to see no mention of McFadden.

where are all the Greg Olsen lovers? or are they still hiding behind the injuries and that Chicago has no QB? I swear greg olsen and DMC had the same fan following from JN in the past two years, and each year those people pretend like they never wanted said player.

Reggie Bush anyone?

Well I wont be one of those.. I want mcfadden on the jets and I wil always defend my stance even if he turned out to be a bust..

Link to post
Share on other sites
where are all the Greg Olsen lovers? or are they still hiding behind the injuries and that Chicago has no QB? I swear greg olsen and DMC had the same fan following from JN in the past two years, and each year those people pretend like they never wanted said player.

Reggie Bush anyone?

To be fair, McFadden is a much better pro prospect than Olsen plus it's way too early to give up on Olsen especially considering he did show signs last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
To be fair, McFadden is a much better pro prospect than Olsen plus it's way too early to give up on Olsen especially considering he did show signs last year.

the only comparison is that we were/are in a position to draft either and that they are both offensive weapons. I didn't like Olsen because i see speed as overrated at the TE postion. I don't think Gates will win many races but he knows how to use his body, same goes for the Jason Witten's of the world. Olsen may turn out to be good, but he would have been a poor choice for the Jets last season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
the only comparison is that we were/are in a position to draft either and that they are both offensive weapons. I didn't like Olsen because i see speed as overrated at the TE postion. I don't think Gates will win many races but he knows how to use his body, same goes for the Jason Witten's of the world. Olsen may turn out to be good, but he would have been a poor choice for the Jets last season.

I agree. Revis, and even Houston, would have made more sense considering the Jets needs. Olsen was an overrated prospect b/c he was the top TE in a weak draft class for tight ends/ If Olsen came out a year earlier he'd a been a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

As for the article I have to disagree about Peterson over Calvin Johnson. I like Petersen but in the long run I think Calvin is going to be a much more valuable player.

Link to post
Share on other sites
where are all the Greg Olsen lovers? or are they still hiding behind the injuries and that Chicago has no QB? I swear greg olsen and DMC had the same fan following from JN in the past two years, and each year those people pretend like they never wanted said player.

Reggie Bush anyone?

Dude, WTF are you talking about???

Olsen showed a ton of potential this year. He was injured for the start of the season and obviously as a rookie it will take time to adjust to the NFL. He had absolutely no QB's either. To write him off after one season where he was in a dire situation is absolute bull****.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dude, WTF are you talking about???

Olsen showed a ton of potential this year. He was injured for the start of the season and obviously as a rookie it will take time to adjust to the NFL. He had absolutely no QB's either. To write him off after one season where he was in a dire situation is absolute bull****.

Wow, getting fistey are you? G-reg could turn out to be good, but its not like the Jets are in the position to take luxury pick. I can't even imagine how much worse this team would have been, and would be in trading Revis for Olsen.

On the flip side, we may have had Justin Blalock along with G-reg-thug turd...which would have made me happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow, getting fistey are you? G-reg could turn out to be good, but its not like the Jets are in the position to take luxury pick. I can't even imagine how much worse this team would have been, and would be in trading Revis for Olsen.

On the flip side, we may have had Justin Blalock along with G-reg-thug turd...which would have made me happy.

I'm not saying we should have taken him, and never wanted him but you spoke of him as if he has shown nothing and was on his way to becoming a Kyle Brady player.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not saying we should have taken him, and never wanted him but you spoke of him as if he has shown nothing and was on his way to becoming a Kyle Brady player.

i wouldn't put it past him (being the next ****ty TE). Apparently the newest fad for a TE is 40 time. If you have that, you are a first round pick.

Yet every elite TE i see, Gonzo, Gates, Cooley, are just great athletes, great hands and smart players. I'm not buying the whole 'super athlete' crap at the TE position, give me a guy that uses his body and scores TD's....which is something Olsen didn't even do in college.

-your retort, "olsen's QB's have always sucked"

-my retort, "olsen is a vag."

:biggrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites
i wouldn't put it past him (being the next ****ty TE). Apparently the newest fad for a TE is 40 time. If you have that, you are a first round pick.

Yet every elite TE i see, Gonzo, Gates, Cooley, are just great athletes, great hands and smart players. I'm not buying the whole 'super athlete' crap at the TE position, give me a guy that uses his body and scores TD's....which is something Olsen didn't even do in college.

-your retort, "olsen's QB's have always sucked"

-my retort, "olsen is a vag."

:biggrin:

i think he's incredibly similar to Dallas Clarke and once he gets a half decent situation I think he'll excell. He has absolutely brilliant hands and I was very impressed with what I saw from him this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
i wouldn't put it past him (being the next ****ty TE). Apparently the newest fad for a TE is 40 time. If you have that, you are a first round pick.

Yet every elite TE i see, Gonzo, Gates, Cooley, are just great athletes, great hands and smart players. I'm not buying the whole 'super athlete' crap at the TE position, give me a guy that uses his body and scores TD's....which is something Olsen didn't even do in college.

-your retort, "olsen's QB's have always sucked"

-my retort, "olsen is a vag."

:biggrin:

You forgot one... the guy that said and I quote... "I wil be a ny jet..thats what i was told" Vernon davis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Darren McFadden - RB - Ar: If McFadden should somehow slip this far, the roar in NY at the draft from all the J.E.T.S. jets jets jets fans will be louder than their moans in the past….hell they may even catch up with them on the solar plane. The Jets have made quite a few moves to shore up a bad team, committing more money this offseason in guarantees…65 million…than any other teams.

  • Thumb Down 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
You forgot one... the guy that said and I quote... "I wil be a ny jet..thats what i was told" Vernon davis

that's who i was implying when i was talking about overhyped players. Davis also said about the jets "of course they'll take me, who else do they have?"

he's a jag. Although he played decent last year, he is no elite TE.

BTW Irish, Olsen has good hands...not great, Hines Ward has great hands. It's sort of funn you compare a first round pick to a guy that wasn't even drafted to play on offense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...