Jump to content

Leon Washington = 274 All purpose yards


InstantClassic

Recommended Posts

Leon Washington was doing it all. 274 all purpose yards and Chatman had more carries then Leon. Goes to show how clueless Shotty is. JETS need to get Leon more the 10 touches a game, he is JETS MVP and makes big plays, he is jets most explosive player and gets 3 carries a game. Mangineous simply Mangineous.

Instead of giving more carries to Leon, Mangini was thinking of next play to call, he told reporters when asked why he didnt run the ball more vs one of the worst rushing D's. He replied " I call the best play that I think is going to work, if thats the case, call the play that u think isnt going to work. His thining is betraying him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leon Washington was doing it all. 274 all purpose yards and Chatman had more carries then Leon. Goes to show how clueless Shotty is. JETS need to get Leon more the 10 touches a game, he is JETS MVP and makes big plays, he is jets most explosive player and gets 3 carries a game. Mangineous simply Mangineous.

Instead of giving more carries to Leon, Mangini was thinking of next play to call, he told reporters when asked why he didnt run the ball more vs one of the worst rushing D's. He replied " I call the best play that I think is going to work, if thats the case, call the play that u think isnt going to work. His thining is betraying him

You're absolutely right.

I think (lol) Mangini has been thinking too much. He is over analyzing, to the point where is out thinking himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The funny thing is Herm, and most of this board for some reason, don't think leon is worth using. Just think, if he gets 10-15 touches a game (which isn't even a lot, geez) maybe he can break more plays open for us. If Leon was the guy running last week, we'd have won, I truly believe this.

TJ has been playing well, and I actually have no qualms with him getting 20 touches a game now. But is it really so wrong to want Leon to get 10-15?

Oops, I just realized, I Freudian Slipped there when referring to Mangini. That Herm up there is supposed to be Mangini. I think I'll just leave it like that instead of correcting my mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...