Jump to content

KC Star article- Thigpen outplays Favre


Kentucky Jet

Recommended Posts

Thigpen outplays Favre, but Jets beat KC

By ADAM TEICHER

The Kansas City Star

DAVID EULITT | The Kansas City Star

Chiefs quarterback Tyler Thigpen had a much better outing Sunday than his last start in Atlanta. He passed for 280 yards and two touchdowns against the Jets at The Meadowlands in East Rutherford, N.J.

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. | One minute

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You are stupid. The Jets are 3rd in the NFL in Sacks. They are 4th in the NFL in Rushing D. They are 9th in the NFL in total points allowed and they are in the top 10 in just about EVERY OTHER category.

Then why are they 4-3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Becuase, troll, their offensive coaching has been pathetic and they have played down to the level of their competition at times.

They have played down to their competition? Doesn't a good/playoff bound team beat the crap out of inferior opponents?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have played down to their competition? Doesn't a good/playoff bound team beat the crap out of inferior opponents?

I responded to one of your troll pals who said the Jets D is a joke. It CLEARLY is not. It's yet to be seen how good they really are or if they are a playoff team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why are they 4-3?

Lets see..

They lost:

16-13(OAK)

19-10 (NE)

48-29 (SD) - I believe 7 of those 48 pts were a pick 6

Defense was only a problem in 1 of those games (SD). If we are only going to score 10 or 13 points vs Oakland or NE, neither great defenses, then we are going to lose some close ones.

I didn't see the game today, but my guess would be that our gameplan was to throw everything but the kitchen sink at Thigpen today and force him to make mistakes. Instead, he got rid of it quick and took advantage of the 1 on 1 coverage packages we were using in the secondary. That being said, we still did beat them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brett Favre has been absolutely ****ing terrible over the past three weeks. People are still jizzing over a 6 TD game he had but some need to realise that away from that he has been one of the worst QB's in the league this season. Thig pen played well today, much better than Favre vs a much better D. Favre will however have people saying "BUT HE GOT THE W, THAT MATTERS MOST" blind to the fact that we won that game in spite of him. Leon was the main reason we won, we were in such a bad position BECAUSE Favre threw 3 INT's, 2 of which led to KC TD's and had a sure pick 6 dropped by Derrick Johnson. Favre was ****ing TERRIBLE in this game, helped by the ****ty playcalling yes but still crap nonetheless. There is absolutely no excuse for attempting the throws he did. Even his 2 TD passes came courtesy of great plays from his weapons, Leon with the YAC and Coles with a GREAT catch. If Chad was a at QB this would no doubt be pointed out right away but with Favre it's sugarcoated.

Trading for Favre was an awful move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the defense is bad on paper. I blame the coaching.

Why do we rush 3 on every passing down? No **** we will give up plays most of the time. It's not about the sacks even, but QB pressure. We don't pressure the QB. Our stupid philosophy is to rush 3 on passing downs and put everyone in coverage. Just in case everyone is covered, the QB just runs for the first down. So dumb.

We won this game because we actually started using 5 man rushes and Herm decided to be conservative too. Our CS has absolutely no idea how to mix things up and when to call what play. They respond directly to criticism by trying to prove to everyone they don't do whatever it is they were criticized for, regardless of the actual game situation or opponent's actions. Like last week, we'd run it on 1st and 2nd down when they had 8 in the box, then on third down we'd pass it when they went to the nickel. That's completely ass backwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dwayne Bowe is a good player, troll. And the Jets D is ranked higher than the frauds in just about every category.

In his 2nd year. Avery is very good in his rookie year.

Troll? Isn't that getting old? You really disappoint me as your anger makes you look really, really stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In his 2nd year. Avery is very good in his rookie year.

Troll? Isn't that getting old? You really disappoint me as your anger makes you look really, really stupid.

Again I could give a crap if a troll like you thinks I stupid. Have I not made that clear? Congrats on barely beating an awful team just like the jets so you're emboldened to come here talking crap. Too bad the frauds didn't lose so you and your troll pals would be AWOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brett Favre has been absolutely ****ing terrible over the past three weeks. People are still jizzing over a 6 TD game he had but some need to realise that away from that he has been one of the worst QB's in the league this season. Thig pen played well today, much better than Favre vs a much better D. Favre will however have people saying "BUT HE GOT THE W, THAT MATTERS MOST" blind to the fact that we won that game in spite of him. Leon was the main reason we won, we were in such a bad position BECAUSE Favre threw 3 INT's, 2 of which led to KC TD's and had a sure pick 6 dropped by Derrick Johnson. Favre was ****ing TERRIBLE in this game, helped by the ****ty playcalling yes but still crap nonetheless. There is absolutely no excuse for attempting the throws he did. Even his 2 TD passes came courtesy of great plays from his weapons, Leon with the YAC and Coles with a GREAT catch. If Chad was a at QB this would no doubt be pointed out right away but with Favre it's sugarcoated.

Trading for Favre was an awful move.

You know, you may be right here. When you think about the games we've played this season, can you think of any games we won with Favre that we couldn't have won with Chad? I can't.

Having said that, can't think of any that we lost that we would've won with Chad at the helm...

Either way, we're 4-3. with a big game upcoming vs. Buffalo. We get that one and we're still right in the thick of things. I guess the difference is with Brett Favre at the helm, being in the thick of things means more than maybe a 1st round loss. You never know when he's going to get on a roll and make things happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, you may be right here. When you think about the games we've played this season, can you think of any games we won with Favre that we couldn't have won with Chad? I can't.

Having said that, can't think of any that we lost that we would've won with Chad at the helm...

Either way, we're 4-3. with a big game upcoming vs. Buffalo. We get that one and we're still right in the thick of things. I guess the difference is with Brett Favre at the helm, being in the thick of things means more than maybe a 1st round loss. You never know when he's going to get on a roll and make things happen.

I don't see how we lose to either Oakland or NE with Chad at QB. Seriously, Favre was awful in both of those games, especially Oakland.

At least vs New England we had an excuse, we were adapting to a completely revamped offense, but overall Favre has been a complete weakness for this team to the point where I strongly believe Pennington would have been a better option.

Can I point out again, I said Pennington was the better option BEFORE we signed Favre, WHEN we signed Favre and SINCE we signed Favre. That's for the sheep who like to call me a flip-flopper whenever I say anything about anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again I could give a crap if a troll like you thinks I stupid. Have I not made that clear? Congrats on barely beating an awful team just like the jets so you're emboldened to come here talking crap. Too bad the frauds didn't lose so you and your troll pals would be AWOL.

Since when have I been AWOL? I've been posting here since the site started.

You really need to go to a gun range and fire a weapon as that would be the only time you could shot a load of bullets at, or in, anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...