NIGHT STALKER Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Who is more of a cancer in the locker room, Favre or T.O.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetkid94 Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 favres ego is much bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Obviously it's Favre - that's why he has so many losing seasons under his belt.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KozJets Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Terrell Owens no questions asked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Favre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Favre without a doubt... he was an "icon" that wore out his welcome in GB which for him must have been hard to do... and he is a me first player... TO wants his teams to win at least... if Favre won the MVP, went to the pro-bowl, and got 30TDs he wouldnt give a **** what the team did... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KozJets Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 I don't understand how you could say Favre is worse than TO. TO is the epitome of whiny little b*tch. Favre is a likable guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Easily TO, Favre has had one losing season in his 18 year career. Not sure you can compare that with TO and his one super bowl appearance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gang_green03 Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 I don't like Favre but its T.O. and its not even a discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 No question he wasn't a cancer in the Green Bay locker room. I'm talking about the Jets locker room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 No question he wasn't a cancer in the Green Bay locker room. I'm talking about the Jets locker room. Well then your question makes no sense. T.O. isn't on the Jets so there is very little chance he could be a distraction in their locker room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montreal Jet Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 No question he wasn't a cancer in the Green Bay locker room. I'm talking about the Jets locker room. T.O has been a cancer in 3 locker rooms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 T.O has been a cancer in 3 locker rooms. Favre has been a cnacer in 2... both have hurt every team they have played for... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montreal Jet Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Favre has been a cnacer in 2... both have hurt every team they have played for... Was he a cancer in the GB locker room? I'm sure the circus regarding his retirement last year must have been tough for the GB organization, but he was pushed into it by management? Was there any problems before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Hard to say, I haven't been in a locker room with either of them. Nor are the situations comparable. 1. TO is not the only disruptive force in Dallas. If TO behaved Dallas would not be cancer free. Brett is the only or at least the vast majority of the problem for the Jets. 2. TO being disrupting the locker room is all TO's fault. With Brett some of the fault lies with the situation. Chad was a popular QB (with the players) so he was resented from day one. But some of it does rest with BF being an prima dona. 3. TO being a cancer is not as big of a problem. The WR doesn't lead the offense the QB does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NY JETS 29 Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 T.O - The open criticism week after week about the coaching staff and players seems like more of a distraction then Favre's ego. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borgoguy Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 I heard something on the radio the other day that actually shocked me. I think it was Jay Glazer who said that, in Green Bay, Favre dressed in a separate locker room than the other packers, had his own office adjacent to the locker room, and was basically treated by Packer management as a "little king". How could an ego maniac like that ever foster team camaraderie? This guy is a f**king moron, forget about a cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 Well then your question makes no sense. T.O. isn't on the Jets so there is very little chance he could be a distraction in their locker room. Don't press my Happy New Year greeting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Didn't Favre cause global warming too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Who is more of a cancer in the locker room, Favre or T.O.? ridiculous question. Favre = not a locker room cancer TO = locker room cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Didn't Favre cause global warming too? I thought he invented the internet.. Oh wait, that was Al Gore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Favre has been a cnacer in 2... both have hurt every team they have played for... Are you kidding me. He had 1 losing season in GB.. You guys are out of control at this point.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Are you kidding me. He had 1 losing season in GB.. You guys are out of control at this point.. And to think he was a football god on here two months ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Are you kidding me. He had 1 losing season in GB.. You guys are out of control at this point.. And the Jets didn't have a losing season this year. TO had zero losing seasons with the Cowboys. What is your point? If your team does better than 8-8 then there are no locker room issues? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 ridiculous question. Favre = not a locker room cancer TO = locker room cancer. Sorry, if only I had been a professional athlete... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Sorry, if only I had been a professional athlete... typical response when you have nothing of importance to add. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Are you kidding me. He had 1 losing season in GB.. You guys are out of control at this point.. What does losing have to do with being a cancer? He didnt want to help build up the QB of the future... he thought he was godly and dont act like that doesnt hurt the team... The way he talks about offense and "his" offense in GB should be enough to tell you... TO gets criticized for complaining he doesnt get the ball enough... Favre hand his hands in the cookie jar (Offensive playbook) to make sure he could do whatever he wanted... and it only worked once for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 typical response when you have nothing of importance to add. Did you want me to just come right out and call you an idiot? I thought I was being kind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 Did you want me to just come right out and call you an idiot? I thought I was being kind. Again, nothing better to add, so resort to name calling.. .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 Again, nothing better to add, so resort to name calling.. .. You know what, I apologize for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.