Jump to content

Ok these guys are all available when we pick,who do you take?


TNJet

Who do you take outta these?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Who do you take outta these?

    • Will Moore-S Mizzou
      10
    • Jeremy Maclin-WR Mizzou
      15
    • Chris Wells-RB Ohio St
      5
    • Michael Oher-OT Miss
      2


Recommended Posts

I picked the Safety, Moore, but I hope Taylor Mays somehow could fall that far instead.

Maclin is a joke. Think Devin Hester, but like, half of that. Think Dante Hall!

We don't need a Running Back or an OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it FIRST important to know who the coach is and whether Favre has hopefully retired?

Isn't this premature?

Favre retired 3 years ago. I like the thoughts of a young RT too,Woody is getting old and we need tio groom a valuable replacement. Think of our depth at Oline..yikes! none. We could relive 07 if we were to lose Faneca and Woody to injuries! Oh no,draft some oline depth. There is like 4 Stud OT predicted in the 1st rnd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far, FAR too early but I do like Maclin as a prospect.

124 compares him to Deving Hester, the former CB. LOL

I think he's a lot more like DeSean Jackson, I think he'll be a stud.

You dont draft players like that in the first round. jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pass rush, pass rush, pass rush.

rey maualuga, if for no other reason than this

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ds-Mrp0wl4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ds-Mrp0wl4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

btw that's erin andrews

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far, FAR too early but I do like Maclin as a prospect.

124 compares him to Deving Hester, the former CB. LOL

I think he's a lot more like DeSean Jackson, I think he'll be a stud.

I fail to see why its too early considering our season is over,and our next coach is likely to be a joke. Its time to improve,the draft is only 3 months away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far, FAR too early but I do like Maclin as a prospect.

124 compares him to Deving Hester, the former CB. LOL

I think he's a lot more like DeSean Jackson, I think he'll be a stud.

Exactly. Former CB, now WR. Hester also played WR at "The U".

Maclin will be half of what Hester has become. He won't be a stud, are you kidding me? Injury waiting to happen. Say hello to Dante Hall!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Former CB, now WR. Hester also played WR at "The U".

Maclin will be half of what Hester has become. He won't be a stud, are you kidding me? Injury waiting to happen. Say hello to Dante Hall!

hester looks good because of great blocking on KR and PR, what did hester do this year, not much. however daniel manning looked good, the guy who replaced hester

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One things for sure,with our D likely going back to 4-3,you can forget about a DE/DT in the early rnds. We have several starting cailber 4-3 DE's now,and wont add to that mess. Gholston,Thomas,Ellis,Coleman,Bowens,Pace,heck even Mosely played a little DE this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hester looks good because of great blocking on KR and PR, what did hester do this year, not much. however daniel manning looked good, the guy who replaced hester

:face:

You are missing the point. Hester as a WR, as Maclin is a WR/KR like he is.

BTW, a large part of Hester's non-TD season was because of his use on offense. He is now starting for Chicago which is going to hurt his skills returning kicks and punts. Same thing would happen to Leon Washington if we used him to run the ball 15 times a game.

Chicago is lucky to have a guy like Daniel Manning, but Hester is still by far the better return man. He is one of the best ever, it is not just the schemes.

How'd those schemes that a former Bear assitant that we signed to become our Special Teams coach prior to Westhoff coming back work out for us? So badly we needed Westhoff back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One things for sure,with our D likely going back to 4-3,you can forget about a DE/DT in the early rnds. We have several starting cailber 4-3 DE's now,and wont add to that mess. Gholston,Thomas,Ellis,Coleman,Bowens,Pace,heck even Mosely played a little DE this year.

How are we likely going back to a 43? We have better personal for a 34. The only way we go to a 43 is if Spanuolo comes in and he is hell bent on sticking a square peg into a round hole like Mangini was. Say hello to another three years of inconsisent defense because we cannot go out in Free Agency and spend like we did last year to get 43 players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:face:

You are missing the point. Hester as a WR, as Maclin is a WR/KR like he is.

BTW, a large part of Hester's non-TD season was because of his use on offense. He is now starting for Chicago which is going to hurt his skills returning kicks and punts. Same thing would happen to Leon Washington if we used him to run the ball 15 times a game.

Chicago is lucky to have a guy like Daniel Manning, but Hester is still by far the better return man. He is one of the best ever, it is not just the schemes.

How'd those schemes that a former Bear assitant that we signed to become our Special Teams coach prior to Westhoff coming back work out for us? So badly we needed Westhoff back.

Keep it up,I'd hate for you to try and support him after we pick him lol. Maclin will be there when we pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are we likely going back to a 43? We have better personal for a 34. The only way we go to a 43 is if Spanuolo comes in and he is hell bent on sticking a square peg into a round hole like Mangini was. Say hello to another three years of inconsisent defense because we cannot go out in Free Agency and spend like we did last year to get 43 players.

Because we have no idea if we will get a coach that wants to run Mangini's failed scheme. What if the man is Jagodzinski? He will run a 4-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep it up,I'd hate for you to try and support him after we pick him lol. Maclin will be there when we pick.

Of course he will be there becuase nobody will want him. Don't worry, I won't be supporting him if we do idiotically select him. I wasn't going to select McFadden if we had picked him either. Would be a stupid, stupid pick. Get a WR with actually #1 WR talent, because THAT is what we need. Not ****ing Dante Hall or Devin Hester. We have Leon Washington to return kicks and punts. Give me a #1 WR talent like one of the two UNC WR's or Crabtree (I know they'd have to trade up to get him, relax).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he will be there becuase nobody will want him. Don't worry, I won't be supporting him if we do idiotically select him. I wasn't going to select McFadden if we had picked him either. Would be a stupid, stupid pick. Get a WR with actually #1 WR talent, because THAT is what we need. Not ****ing Dante Hall or Devin Hester. We have Leon Washington to return kicks and punts. Give me a #1 WR talent like one of the two UNC WR's or Crabtree (I know they'd have to trade up to get him, relax).

The wr i'd like the most would be Darius Heyward Bey from Maryland. But I dont think he'd be a first rnd pick more like a second. I was osting players I thought would be in the 17-22 range where we will be picking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Former CB, now WR. Hester also played WR at "The U".

Maclin will be half of what Hester has become. He won't be a stud, are you kidding me? Injury waiting to happen. Say hello to Dante Hall!

Maclin is bigger than all of those guys and just as elusive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Favre retired 3 years ago. I like the thoughts of a young RT too,Woody is getting old and we need tio groom a valuable replacement. Think of our depth at Oline..yikes! none. We could relive 07 if we were to lose Faneca and Woody to injuries! Oh no,draft some oline depth. There is like 4 Stud OT predicted in the 1st rnd.

Woody is getting old? He's a RT who just turned 31. He's not old. Those guys play at a high level into their mid-30's. He's also under contract for 4 more seasons. You don't sign a guy to a long-term deal and then, when he didn't disappoint, in the next season draft his replacement with your first-round pick.

The one area this team is fortunate enough to have under contract - with quality players - is along the OL. They could use some depth, but you don't draft depth in the middle of round 1.

Any OL pick is a reach for the Jets in rounds 1 or 2, and probably in round 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woody is getting old? He's a RT who just turned 31. He's not old. Those guys play at a high level into their mid-30's. He's also under contract for 4 more seasons. You don't sign a guy to a long-term deal and then, when he didn't disappoint, in the next season draft his replacement with your first-round pick.

The one area this team is fortunate enough to have under contract - with quality players - is along the OL. They could use some depth, but you don't draft depth in the middle of round 1.

Any OL pick is a reach for the Jets in rounds 1 or 2, and probably in round 4.

I thought he was 34,my bad,I want depth in the draft. If a good linemen gets hurt we're screwed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought he was 34,my bad,I want depth in the draft. If a good linemen gets hurt we're screwed.

A team that needs immediate starters at other positions doesn't draft backups/depth in round 1. Particularly along the OL.

And we're in no more of need for depth along the OL than we are in the secondary or at receiver - areas where we need starters AND backups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jets need playmakers that can start immediately, not depth in the first few rounds. This seems a bit premature though not knowing who the coach is and the style that will be implemented

playmakers huh, hakeem nicks and kenny Britt just declared, both would add a dimension to the offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

okay..... well hakeem nicks is still good, derrick williams is fast and big enough at 6 feet, mohammad massaquoi is a big reciever from georgia at 6'2"

Nobody from Penn State either.

Give me one of the two UNC receivers or Hayward-Bay from Maryland since Crabtree is a Top 5 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody from Penn State either.

Give me one of the two UNC receivers or Hayward-Bay from Maryland since Crabtree is a Top 5 pick.

I like all of those WR's too.

I do think Crabtree is overrated a bit. He's very good but he's not Calvin Johnson type good.

The kid Hakeem Nicks is a beast. I'd love the Jets to go after him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kid Hakeem Nicks is a beast. I'd love the Jets to go after him.

Finally we can agree on something. :lol:

BTW I think Crabtree isn't going to be on the same level as R.Moss, Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson & Calvin Johnson. I think he's going to be an Anquan Boldin type of guy, with more speed. He'll be close to being elite, but not quite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of those choices I'd probably go with Maclin, with Wells a close second. At this point I'd rate Maclin slightly behind Wells in terms of BPA but since WR is a much greater need, Wells isn't so much better that he trumps the bigger need.

Not really a huge fan of those choices though lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...