ECURB Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 when have we used multiple high draft choices at qb? clemens at 2nd doesn't count cause the man is a bust and was a wasted pick. How does he not count... thats the whole point... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 No. 78.5 includes merges. If it was threads created the over would be a mortal lock. Without the "merge" function, Ratliff threads could single-handedly destroy teh interwebz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancemehl Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 A little birdie told me that Mel Kiper posts here under the alias "lancemehl"... MUTHA F$#KA!!! Kiper likes Ratliff!!!????? GoDDDAMMMITTT!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaumerJet Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 You stay true to your draft board and balance it with need. If at 17, the best value for the Jets is QB based on their board, I have no problem with that choice. There are worse problems to have in this league than several good qurterbacks, and you can actually position yourself advantageously, if the need arises. Scott, here's the problem - IT'S NOT A DEEP QB DRAFT IN '09!" It's very mediocre, to say the least. Unless the Jets can trade the pick for multiple picks in the 2nd & 3rd rounds & then go after a QB in the 3rd round, I can not see us taking a QB at 17. It's too obvious that in a draft that is heavy on Defense & mid range on running backs & recievers - YOU GO AFTER A RECEIVER or a RUNNING BACK. And that's this Baumerjet's story! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.