spjets Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 TITANS LAND WASHINGTON Posted by Aaron Wilson on March 2, 2009, 6:07 p.m. The Tennessee Titans have reached an agreement with Pittsburgh Steelers free agent wide receiver Nate Washington, according to the Tennessean. Per Washington’s agent, Brian Overstreet, Washington struck a deal with the Titans today. No terms were immediately available as far as the structure or value of the contract. The Titans have scheduled a press conference for tonight. As the Steelers’ third receiver behind Hines Ward and Santonio Holmes, Washington caught a career-high 40 passes for 631 yards and three touchdowns last season why arent we looking at any Vet receivers ?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 They need more than Washington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy IRisH Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I wouldnt have minded washington, he would made a nice 2nd option. clowney needs to prove himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFJET33 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 we have enough "good wrs." see if you can find a great FA WR thats worth the money as opposed to drafting one of the many talented WRs with our 1st pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 we have enough "good wrs." see if you can find a great FA WR thats worth the money as opposed to drafting one of the many talented WRs with our 1st pick. washington was on my radar, he has deep speed the best part of adding a guy like washington is he becomes your 3rd guy, a classic outside deep threat dang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 washington was on my radar, he has deep speed the best part of adding a guy like washington is he becomes your 3rd guy, a classic outside deep threat dang my hope is clowney becomes our #3 threat & exceeds all our expectations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 my hope is clowney becomes our #3 threat & exceeds all our expectations that would be sweet. he had a nice grab late last season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFJET33 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 washington was on my radar, he has deep speed the best part of adding a guy like washington is he becomes your 3rd guy, a classic outside deep threat dang sorry to burst your bubble larz, but we already have that guy in david clowney, we need a big #1 type WR to complement the rest of the unit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 sorry to burst your bubble larz, but we already have that guy in david clowney, we need a big #1 type WR to complement the rest of the unit you think and pray we have that guy washington was much more polished and established Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFJET33 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 you think and pray we have that guy washington was much more polished and established haha i am praying that clowney is that guy, the few flashes he showed last season including preseason were promising enough to let him have the chance to be that guy for us next season. nate washington clearly has had more playing time so its tough to compare his nfl resume to clowney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 haha i am praying that clowney is that guy, the few flashes he showed last season including preseason were promising enough to let him have the chance to be that guy for us next season. nate washington clearly has had more playing time so its tough to compare his nfl resume to clowney. I like clowney, I really do, but I wanted washington. every addition improves the corp, and at this point, it is the weak link adding washington would mean we'd have, going into the draft, Cotch washington stuckey clowney smith wright cleary a glaring need here, but not a terrible group Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdropOFvenom Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 we have enough "good wrs." see if you can find a great FA WR thats worth the money as opposed to drafting one of the many talented WRs with our 1st pick. There isn't a Great FA WR. That's the problem. Nor does it sound like any of the teams rumored to trade their star WR plan on actually pulling the trigger. Leaving only the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 They need more than Washington. IDK, Justin Gage and Nate Washington could be a troublesome duo for Heimerdinger's offense. If either of the rookies Davis/Hawkins can give them production in year 2 w/ McCraphands. Thats not bad. You definitely have to defend the entire field with the Johnson/White combo running the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFJET33 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 There isn't a Great FA WR. That's the problem. Nor does it sound like any of the teams rumored to trade their star WR plan on actually pulling the trigger. Leaving only the draft. agreed. enter Darius Heyward-Bey or Hakeem Nicks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uart Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Devery Henderson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Devery Henderson? The guy has the speed, the agility and the collegiate program (sorry just had to mention LSU) to succeed, but the term "feet for hands" comes to mind. Kidding aside, he really is an older version of the type of player Clowney is, but with bad hands; which is why I think we should roll the dice with Clowney, gotta love his potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 why arent we looking at any Vet receivers ?????? Because we have the amazing and proven David Clowney and Jesus himself, Brett Ratliff, throwing him the football. Ugh. Duh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 TITANS LAND WASHINGTON Posted by Aaron Wilson on March 2, 2009, 6:07 p.m. The Tennessee Titans have reached an agreement with Pittsburgh Steelers free agent wide receiver Nate Washington, according to the Tennessean. why arent we looking at any Vet receivers ?????? Who says we're not ? Just because we haven't signed anyone doesn't mean we're not looking . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Because we have the amazing and proven David Clowney and Jesus himself, Brett Ratliff, throwing him the football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.