Norway'sWaddlingMarmaloof Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 There is nothing wrong with watching soccer. Yeah well, there's nothing right with it either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyPaige Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Other than explaining to your dad that you're gay. So I'm guessing you're not excited for USA v. Trinidad tonight. Pity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norway'sWaddlingMarmaloof Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Holy sh1t dude. Chill out. Ha! FOS - Irish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Agreed. I ****ing hate BG. You keep this up Crush and I might start having my feelings hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 LOL. I just posted the same thing...see above! And his current vote is for me because he said he didn't like how I handled the pressure of being accused. You can't make this sh1t up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyPaige Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 I would just like to point out the you gave him a total of 5 minutes to explain after you noticed that he made a case against you. Yeah. That doesn't look so good. FOS Irish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Holy sh1t dude. Chill out. Ha, yeah I'm just curious to see what has him so convinced that I'm scum. It was a very confusing post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 There is nothing wrong with watching soccer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 ^^^ booo to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyPaige Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norway'sWaddlingMarmaloof Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Ha, yeah I'm just curious to see what has him so convinced that I'm scum. It was a very confusing post. Maybe he's taking a complicated poop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Proof that every effort at insulting soccer = Fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 ^^ for you Woody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 You keep this up Crush and I might start having my feelings hurt. You have feelings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Proof that every effort at insulting soccer = Fail I'm sorry, do you accept this kiss as an apology? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Haha, you fail. You should be voted off just for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Proof that every effort at insulting soccer = Fail Agreed my 8 year old daughter is awesome at soccer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyPaige Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Haha, you fail. You should be voted off just for that. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan. Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 To expand on the, re: Sharrow His last post in this thread was at 4:10pm yesterday. Since then he has made 11 posts in other areas of the site including 2 this afternoon yet hasn't said diddly in here. Seems like that is by design, not by accident. Yeah, I think it's funny Slats called it "surprising" that people are pressuring Sharrow to talk. Considering Slats' primary method of attack has been to count people's total number of posts in the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 There's a nice progression to these posts. We start the thread being super nice... 'Lets wait it out' 'I want to be sure' 'Lets be friends' 'I understand everyone's strategy, but will wait' 'I'm going to mention a player only because he's good' All the above is: "LOOK HOW INNOCENT AND FAIR AND PRO TOWN I AM" 'vote JMJ' 'I'm keeping my vote on JMJ' Then, the vote for JMJ, who has no argument against him besides his inactivity. So, we jump to agree, and yet, in contrast to your earlier statement of 'wait it out' and 'want to be sure' 'thats your argument?' 'you still have my vote, just because of no one else' contradiction 'your playing the same way' (to JT or WP) attack another player who's got a lot of votes 'unvote JMJ, time to look at JT/WP' one bandwagon fails, and only thoughts are to the next one. 'moron card' Friends, its fairly obvious that after trying very hard to show how 'Pro-Town' he was, he went on the aggressive towards one player. Then, when it didn't work out, he immediately went aggressive on two others who already had wagons. Now, SMC has my attention for wagon jumping, but at least he admit that's exactly what he's doing. Further, Irish Jet is playing at a level of aggression we haven't seen from him before. After his early posts, all of his relevent ones have been on the attack. In his prior two games, in which he proved to be roleless town, he was much more passive. :corn::corn: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Haha, you fail. You should be voted off just for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Ha, yeah I'm just curious to see what has him so convinced that I'm scum. It was a very confusing post. If we're to take this at face value, why is your current vote still for me (well, you unvoted me and then said you're more than likely going to stick with me) when your reasoning is you didn't like how I handled the pressure of being accused. With all due respect, I handled it better than you did. Rather hypocritical reason to have me as your vote if you ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Yeah, I think it's funny Slats called it "surprising" that people are pressuring Sharrow to talk. Considering Slats' primary method of attack has been to count people's total number of posts in the thread. That's actually a good point. Slats has done that twice in this thread if i recall correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodyPaige Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Unvote. Vote: Irish. EY seems to have a decent case here especially for the first day. I am not liking the fact that he had a vote on JMJ for not handling pressure well and didn't handled it well when EY put the vote on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 If we're to take this at face value, why is your current vote still for me (well, you unvoted me and then said you're more than likely going to stick with me) when your reasoning is you didn't like how I handled the pressure of being accused. With all due respect, I handled it better than you did. Rather hypocritical reason to have me as your vote if you ask me. True. BTW, anyone else find the subtle deflection of attention from our still absent Sharrow a bit timely? Just something to keep in mind If Sharrow pops up guilty (on finder or lynch). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 There's a nice progression to these posts. We start the thread being super nice... 'Lets wait it out' 'I want to be sure' 'Lets be friends' 'I understand everyone's strategy, but will wait' 'I'm going to mention a player only because he's good' All the above is: "LOOK HOW INNOCENT AND FAIR AND PRO TOWN I AM" 'vote JMJ' 'I'm keeping my vote on JMJ' Then, the vote for JMJ, who has no argument against him besides his inactivity. So, we jump to agree, and yet, in contrast to your earlier statement of 'wait it out' and 'want to be sure' 'thats your argument?' 'you still have my vote, just because of no one else' contradiction 'your playing the same way' (to JT or WP) attack another player who's got a lot of votes 'unvote JMJ, time to look at JT/WP' one bandwagon fails, and only thoughts are to the next one. 'moron card' Friends, its fairly obvious that after trying very hard to show how 'Pro-Town' he was, he went on the aggressive towards one player. Then, when it didn't work out, he immediately went aggressive on two others who already had wagons. Now, SMC has my attention for wagon jumping, but at least he admit that's exactly what he's doing. Further, Irish Jet is playing at a level of aggression we haven't seen from him before. After his early posts, all of his relevent ones have been on the attack. In his prior two games, in which he proved to be roleless town, he was much more passive. :corn::corn: Irish, you got the explanation you wanted. Any reply? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 True. BTW, anyone else find the subtle deflection of attention from our still absent Sharrow a bit timely? Just something to keep in mind If Sharrow pops up guilty (on finder or lynch). I switched my vote to Sharrow already and explained why (only 4 posts in this thread since the game has begun yet 11 posts outside of this thread with 2 of them coming this afternoon, etc.). However, someone else made a good point about Slats. Slats defended Sharrow saying he was surprised people were becoming suspicious of him just because he was inactive, but Slats himself has pointed to inactivity as a reason for suspicion more than once in this very thread. Odd behavior by both of them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Irish, you got the explanation you wanted. Any reply? Give him 5 minutes and ask him again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Things Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Give him 5 minutes and ask him again. LOL!! Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Good explanation, EY. Damn, will there be another wagon jump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan. Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Give him 5 minutes and ask him again. But also I'd like to point out that in general, isn't it easier to perceive other people's reactions as over the top, than to notice that about your own reactions? Just as JMJ claimed that his defensiveness yesterday wasn't as bad as Irish's reaction today (and I'd say the jury is still out on that one). We'll see how Irish responds now that EY has explained himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 There's a nice progression to these posts. We start the thread being super nice... 'Lets wait it out' 'I want to be sure' 'Lets be friends' 'I understand everyone's strategy, but will wait' 'I'm going to mention a player only because he's good' All the above is: "LOOK HOW INNOCENT AND FAIR AND PRO TOWN I AM" 'vote JMJ' 'I'm keeping my vote on JMJ' Then, the vote for JMJ, who has no argument against him besides his inactivity. So, we jump to agree, and yet, in contrast to your earlier statement of 'wait it out' and 'want to be sure' 'thats your argument?' 'you still have my vote, just because of no one else' contradiction 'your playing the same way' (to JT or WP) attack another player who's got a lot of votes 'unvote JMJ, time to look at JT/WP' one bandwagon fails, and only thoughts are to the next one. 'moron card' Friends, its fairly obvious that after trying very hard to show how 'Pro-Town' he was, he went on the aggressive towards one player. Then, when it didn't work out, he immediately went aggressive on two others who already had wagons. Now, SMC has my attention for wagon jumping, but at least he admit that's exactly what he's doing. Further, Irish Jet is playing at a level of aggression we haven't seen from him before. After his early posts, all of his relevent ones have been on the attack. In his prior two games, in which he proved to be roleless town, he was much more passive. :corn::corn: You really do overestimate me. LOL I really don't know what to say to this. I'm not overly suspicious of anyone, JMJ got it originally because he was inactive and it stuck because I wasn't convinced with his response. My earlier posts were taken out of context. I don't like to jump on people early for no reason, but it's day 1, which is basically a crapshoot anyways. I was slightly suspicious WP, JT but not enough to really vote for either. I haven't went aggresively after anyone really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 But also I'd like to point out that in general, isn't it easier to perceive other people's reactions as over the top, than to notice that about your own reactions? Just as JMJ claimed that his defensiveness yesterday wasn't as bad as Irish's reaction today (and I'd say the jury is still out on that one). We'll see how Irish responds now that EY has explained himself. In all fairness, I logged off the site at 7pm Monday night with no votes and no reason for suspicion. I logged on the site at 7am the next morning with 3 votes. That is partly why I was so baffled. 3 votes > 1 vote. That is neither here nor there though at this point I guess. But ultimately I still want an explanation from him on how I can still be his vote after his recent actions. If he keeps his vote on my it is amazingly hypocritical. The other two voters who have selected me can keep me as their vote from not until forever for all I care, but it bothers me now that he has his vote on me due to nothing more than the reasoning he gave. Like I said, you can't make something like that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 You really do overestimate me. LOL BHAHAHAHAHHAHA You just attacked two people for taking the dumb route. Now you're going to tell me you're not good enough to go with a strategy of: I'm everyones friend and making sure to do everything right... then, after some time, jumping on innocent* players and being a bit too aggressive in doing it. :corn::corn: *I am not certain by any means that JMJ, JT, WP are innocent, but we don't have any good evidence to go on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.