ECURB Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Without a doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProfessorJet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 ???? Are you attempting to employ a Latin subtext? Your intent is most quizzical at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeC36 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 ???? affirmative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Homo is such an ugly word. I believe rump ranger is more appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProfessorJet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Homo is such an ugly word. I believe rump ranger is more appropriate. Or, more correctly, pederast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Or, more correctly, pederast. salami smuggler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProfessorJet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 salami smuggler Though a tad too ethnically specific to be universal in its application, yes, your suggestion, with great certainty, has more than a modicum of merit. Well done, lad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norway'sWaddlingMarmaloof Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Though a tad too ethnically specific to be universal in its application, yes, your suggestion, with great certainty, has more than a modicum of merit. Well done, lad. This one should be right up your alley....poof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProfessorJet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 This one should be right up your alley....[poofI] Why are you continually employing an arcane term related to magic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiLMiCKMANTLE Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 lets keeps it simple here.. there all FLAMERS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norway'sWaddlingMarmaloof Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Why are you continually employing an arcane term related to magic? I'm trying to make you disappear, fagly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProfessorJet Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 lets keeps it simple here.. there all FLAMERS Then would you include Prometheus as one of this ilk? I think not. A valiant attempt, but just off the mark, in my humble opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.