124 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Report: Harvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 This article is full of ****, just like these rumors. He "allegedly" tested positive for weed. So therefore, he has off-field character issues? I follow that team like a Hawk and Percy is my all time favorite Gator. You want to say he wont be **** at the next level, fine. I cant predict the future, I think he will be special, but who knows. However, these character issues are bogus, the guy has never had any issues off the field except for this alleged positive weed test, which doesnt mean ****, they all smoke it. O.K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 A twelve? It's amazing he can remember his own name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 124, if Harvin is overrated, how can his stock be dropping? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 124, if Harvin is overrated, how can his stock be dropping? Zing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 It's a wonder someone so f'ed up was able to play on two national championship teams and manage to play hurt in the most recent championship game. Gil Brandt is one of the best personnel guys around...I believe waht he said about his talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 I don't think the Wonderlic test shows anything, I am surprised anyone pays attention to it or that anyone requires players to take it. Here is a list of scores of Qb's, (Chris Leak's score at the bottom is disputed). There seems to be little correlation between Wonderlic scores and eventual success. Drew Henson 42 Alex Smith 40 Eli Manning 39 Brian Griese 39 Charlie Frye 38 Tony Romo 37 Drew Bledsoe 36 Matt Leinart 35 Kellen Clemens 35 Aaron Rodgers 35 Tom Brady 33 Steve Young 33 Joey Harrington 32 Patrick Ramsey 32 Sage Rosenfels 32 J.P. Losman 31 Matt Schaub 31 Phillip Rivers 30 Brady Quinn 29 Rex Grossman 29 Marc Bulger 29 Matt Hasselbeck 29 Troy Aikman 29 John Elway 29 Drew Brees 28 Peyton Manning 28 Kyle Boller 27 Ryan Leaf 27 Jay Cutler 26 Kyle Orton 26 Carson Palmer 26 Akili Smith 26 Ben Roethlisberger 25 Byron Leftwich 25 Chad Pennington 25 JaMarcus Russell 24 David Carr 24 Jason Campbell 23 Tim Couch 22 Trent Dilfer 22 Brett Favre 22 Michael Vick 20 Tarvaris Jackson 19 Bruce Gradkowski 19 Derek Anderson 19 A.J. Feeley 19 Daunte Culpepper 18 Aaron Brooks 17 Vinny Testeverde 17 Vince Young 16 Steve McNair 15 Randall Cunningham 15 Dan Marino 15 Terry Bradshaw 15 David Garrard 14 Donovan McNabb 14 Marcus Vick 11 Jeff George 10 Chris Leak 8 http://www.armchairassociation.com/2008/04/wonderlic-me.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 so he is going to fall right into the Jets hands so 124 can b$tch and moan for like 2 weeks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 This article is full of ****, just like these rumors. He "allegedly" tested positive for weed. So therefore, he has off-field character issues? I follow that team like a Hawk and Percy is my all time favorite Gator. You want to say he wont be **** at the next level, fine. I cant predict the future, I think he will be special, but who knows. However, these character issues are bogus, the guy has never had any issues off the field except for this alleged positive weed test, which doesnt mean ****, they all smoke it. O.K. There's ALWAYS a ton of rumours about draft choices this time of year. Some teams, I believe, start them so a prospect will fall to them. It's crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 We need another sub 6ft Wide Reciever like I need a case of the crabs right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 The weed test and posse may be rumors, the wonderlic is not. We might not know the scores of all the players, but the GMs had better. 12 is bad, but not the worst. I'm pretty sure Nicks got an 11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 I don't think the Wonderlic test shows anything, I am surprised anyone pays attention to it or that anyone requires players to take it. Here is a list of scores of Qb's, (Chris Leak's score at the bottom is disputed). There seems to be little correlation between Wonderlic scores and eventual success. Drew Henson 42 Alex Smith 40 Eli Manning 39 Brian Griese 39 Charlie Frye 38 Tony Romo 37 Drew Bledsoe 36 Matt Leinart 35 Kellen Clemens 35 Aaron Rodgers 35 Tom Brady 33 Steve Young 33 Joey Harrington 32 Patrick Ramsey 32 Sage Rosenfels 32 J.P. Losman 31 Matt Schaub 31 Phillip Rivers 30 Brady Quinn 29 Rex Grossman 29 Marc Bulger 29 Matt Hasselbeck 29 Troy Aikman 29 John Elway 29 Drew Brees 28 Peyton Manning 28 Kyle Boller 27 Ryan Leaf 27 Jay Cutler 26 Kyle Orton 26 Carson Palmer 26 Akili Smith 26 Ben Roethlisberger 25 Byron Leftwich 25 Chad Pennington 25 JaMarcus Russell 24 David Carr 24 Jason Campbell 23 Tim Couch 22 Trent Dilfer 22 Brett Favre 22 Michael Vick 20 Tarvaris Jackson 19 Bruce Gradkowski 19 Derek Anderson 19 A.J. Feeley 19 Daunte Culpepper 18 Aaron Brooks 17 Vinny Testeverde 17 Vince Young 16 Steve McNair 15 Randall Cunningham 15 Dan Marino 15 Terry Bradshaw 15 David Garrard 14 Donovan McNabb 14 Marcus Vick 11 Jeff George 10 Chris Leak 8 http://www.armchairassociation.com/2008/04/wonderlic-me.html Vince Young took 2x to score double-digits. He is an imbecile. Clearly the reason he sucks isn't from the neck down. But more than any one example, these guys have a lot more access to practice Wonderlic's than they used to, the types of questions they'll get, etc. Given that, a 12 today is worse than it used to be. Regardless, it cannot be seen as anything other than a negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Donovan McNabb scored a 14 and has been to how many championship games? Terry Bradshaw won four Super Bowls and scored a very low 15. How's Marino's score? And QB is the most cerebral of positions. When and if this test is ever shown to strongly correlate to success on the field it will make sense to count it as a positive or negative. Right now that does not appear to be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Donovan McNabb scored a 14 and has been to how many championship games? Terry Bradshaw won four Super Bowls and scored a very low 15. How's Marino's score? And QB is the most cerebral of positions. When and if this test is ever shown to strongly correlate to success on the field it will make sense to count it as a positive or negative. Right now that does not appear to be the case. The wonderlic is probably the least important of these rumors. I think FOs look at the wonderlic as needing a minimum for each position. Players can have success even if they are stupid, but it makes FOs take a closer look at coachability and things like that. That test can be pretty easy. Players that can't get some minimal score they aren't likely to be too quick to pick up the scheme. One of thost things that isn't that important, but all things being equal you'd prefer the player to do better. It's also something some teams are more concerned with than others. FWIW, I think WR is on the positions where it is considered least critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 dan marino scored 15 :rl::rl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua4ever04 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Don't take this the wrong way, Joe, but you seem to develop a vandetta for players for random reasons. I know you've been barking up the "Harvin sucks" tree for a while now, but why are you so down on he, Sanchez, and any one else that you've stuck this claim to? Again, this isn't smack intended, I want to hear your honest evaluation. The more perspectives, the better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua4ever04 Posted April 12, 2009 Share Posted April 12, 2009 Donovan McNabb scored a 14 and has been to how many championship games? Terry Bradshaw won four Super Bowls and scored a very low 15. How's Marino's score? And QB is the most cerebral of positions. When and if this test is ever shown to strongly correlate to success on the field it will make sense to count it as a positive or negative. Right now that does not appear to be the case. I tend to agree with this idea, but there are a couple of exceptions to the rule out there. Just look at Vince Young; he's the dumbest man to ever play quarterback and he's now a back up because he's clueless to making reads, pre-snap reads/adjustments, and thumbing through progressions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I don't understand why you think this guy is overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I like Harvin, he has a lot of DeSean Jackson about him. He's very versatile in what he can do, he'd be a great in the short passing game, getting YAC because he's incredibly elusive and great in space, I love the fact too that he's not afraid to go across the middle. If he improves his downfield route running, he could become an elite WR, because he has the speed and ball skills to be a deep threat. I'd personally rate him over Heyward Bey or Hakeem Nicks. The only major concern I have with Harvin is durability. It's a risk against the reward scenario with him IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 NOt only does it take years to develop a WR properly... but why the **** would you want to draft a WR in the 1st round only to develop him into a situational guy... which is exactly what Harvin is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua4ever04 Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 I like Harvin, he has a lot of DeSean Jackson about him. He's very versatile in what he can do, he'd be a great in the short passing game, getting YAC because he's incredibly elusive and great in space, I love the fact too that he's not afraid to go across the middle. If he improves his downfield route running, he could become an elite WR, because he has the speed and ball skills to be a deep threat. I'd personally rate him over Heyward Bey or Hakeem Nicks. The only major concern I have with Harvin is durability. It's a risk against the reward scenario with him IMO. The man seems to get hurt every single football game. It's rarely serious, but it's annoying when it happens. Joseph Addai is the same way; he seems to miss one or two series every singl game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Just look at Vince Young; he's the dumbest man to ever play quarterback and he's now a back up because he's clueless to making reads, pre-snap reads/adjustments, and thumbing through progressions. Young is still a young QB-Drew Brees was pretty clueless his first three years as well. He turned it completely around his fourth year, now he's considered a pretty smart QB. Besides, there is a tendency for super-mobile QB's to rely on their legs so much early in their career that they don't give passing plays a chance to develop. Young is not the first QB to make this mistake. I really don't think Vince Young is a one-man vindication of a test which, from the examples I've seen, has not been shown to predict success on the field Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 Oops. Double post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 NOt only does it take years to develop a WR properly... but why the **** would you want to draft a WR in the 1st round only to develop him into a situational guy... which is exactly what Harvin is... Why do you think he will be a situational guy? He is the most versatile player in this draft, you can use him numerous ways. Harvin is the type of player that can play all 4 downs in many different positions. People dont realize how often his number was called at Florida because of all the weapons the Gators have, but the guys was our goto WR for 1st down picks ups on 3rd and anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Consider me officially off the Percy Harvin bandwagon. When he scored a 12 on the Wonderlic, I scratched my head and remembered that I just need him to catch and run. But, when he shows up at the combine for a piss test he knows he is going to take and still tests positive for weed (per ProFootball Talk)….I say no thanks. Sanchez or a runningback is looking better and better to me. I think DHB, Nicks and Britt are big time reaches at 17. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 when he shows up at the combine for a piss test he knows he is going to take and still tests positive for weed...... Good point, one that I am surprised nobody pays attention to. Not just Harvin, but all of these guys who are on the verge of making a lifetime's fortune as long as they don't mess up on the drug test. One question: how long after the last ingestion can marijuana be detected? I have read that it can interact with some things more than a month after usage stopped........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Good point, one that I am surprised nobody pays attention to. Not just Harvin, but all of these guys who are on the verge of making a lifetime's fortune as long as they don't mess up on the drug test. One question: how long after the last ingestion can marijuana be detected? I have read that it can interact with some things more than a month after usage stopped........ Then he should have stopped over a month before. Or two months before. Or three months, whatever it takes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I agree, I'm just wondering how long the time is. It seems to me that the longer something can be detected, the less incredibly stupid the player might be. Having a guy stop a month before the test and still being detected might not be very smart, but I'd find it more understandable than a guy who stopped on Wednesday when the test is on Thursday. Neither one gets any awards for brains, but the month long abstainer might not be totally hopeless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I agree, I'm just wondering how long the time is. It seems to me that the longer something can be detected, the less incredibly stupid the player might be. Having a guy stop a month before the test and still being detected might not be very smart, but I'd find it more understandable than a guy who stopped on Wednesday when the test is on Thursday. Neither one gets any awards for brains, but the month long abstainer might not be totally hopeless. Usually a month or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Why do you think he will be a situational guy? He is the most versatile player in this draft, you can use him numerous ways. Harvin is the type of player that can play all 4 downs in many different positions. People dont realize how often his number was called at Florida because of all the weapons the Gators have, but the guys was our goto WR for 1st down picks ups on 3rd and anything. That's the problem with versatility. These coaches never use it. Versatile players like Brad Smith and Leon Washington rarely see the field except for plays specifically designed for them. Remember our D? All that versatility, OLBs that could play DE, DEs that could play DT, CBs at S, hell Stuckey played S in the preseason - during the season I saw very little of it in action. Just Bowens at ILB. I think coaches like getting a new toy, but then they don't really want to play with it. Consider me officially off the Percy Harvin bandwagon. When he scored a 12 on the Wonderlic, I scratched my head and remembered that I just need him to catch and run. But, when he shows up at the combine for a piss test he knows he is going to take and still tests positive for weed (per ProFootball Talk) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 That's the problem with versatility. These coaches never use it. Versatile players like Brad Smith and Leon Washington rarely see the field except for plays specifically designed for them. Remember our D? All that versatility, OLBs that could play DE, DEs that could play DT, CBs at S, hell Stuckey played S in the preseason - during the season I saw very little of it in action. Just Bowens at ILB. I think coaches like getting a new toy, but then they don't really want to play with it. Depends what test they use. Weed generally stays in your system for as much as 30 days for purposes of the urine test. Some people have trace amounts even longer. I think it's like 3 years for the hair follicle test. Look at it this way, Nicks got an 11. Makes me think of this: edited to fix link. Got it right this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I agree, I'm just wondering how long the time is. It seems to me that the longer something can be detected, the less incredibly stupid the player might be. Having a guy stop a month before the test and still being detected might not be very smart, but I'd find it more understandable than a guy who stopped on Wednesday when the test is on Thursday. Neither one gets any awards for brains, but the month long abstainer might not be totally hopeless. At 22, I managed to quit smoking weed for three months to pass a physical to get a $7 an hour job at the local utility. I think these guys have a little bit more on the line. Liking weed more than I did could not be a possible excuse. No one liked weed more than I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Usually a month or so. When you ask the question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.