The Gun Of Bavaria Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 1) Stafford 2) Sanchez Esepcially Sanchez. This guy has done nothing in College and thinks he Joe Montana. That guy is going to crash faster than Buddy Holly in an ice storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Sanchez is going to be a great QB in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gun Of Bavaria Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Sanchez is going to be a great QB in the NFL. If anyone bombs, I think it will be this guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TampaBayJetsFan85 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Look @ Matt Cassell and what he did last year with the Patriots...I watched Sanchez play last year, this man is going to be elite and he's a winner. USC produces some really good QB's over the years such as Carson Palmer, Matt Leinart, Cassell... This Sanchez kid has the potential to be the best of em all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Sanchez > Stafford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Look @ Matt Cassell and what he did last year with the Patriots...I watched Sanchez play last year, this man is going to be elite and he's a winner. USC produces some really good QB's over the years such as Carson Palmer, Matt Leinart, Cassell... This Sanchez kid has the potential to be the best of em all The biggest knock I now have against Sanchez is that DWC likes him. Maybe that's the biggest knock of all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TampaBayJetsFan85 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Sanchez > Stafford I'm not sure about that...Stafford does have more experience and has played @ a high level. I think Sanchez has more potential but next year, if both QB's were starters...I think Stafford could be a Matt Ryan and Sanchez would be used as a game manager like Joe Flacco. But it's stupid to say that Sanchez will be better than Stafford because Stafford is a stud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Sanchez practically controlled an NFL offense last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 this answer is easy...any one drafted by the Jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 The biggest knock I now have against Sanchez is that DWC likes him. Maybe that's the biggest knock of all. you forgot me>>> I like him too!! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryK Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 The Lions should NOT take a QB with the #1, and that's why they WILL take one. They will likely select Stafford. This means 2 things: -In 2014 Stafford will be on a practice squad somewhere. -In 2030, Sanchez will be inducted into the HOF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 If Matt Cassel taught us anything, it's that you dont need that many starts ( or any at all) to be a good QB in the NFL. Sanchez will benefit from playing at USC where they run a pro style offense. He will probably have a more immediate impact than Stafford will, but we'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 The Lions should NOT take a QB with the #1, and that's why they WILL take one. They will likely select Stafford. This means 2 things: -In 2014 Stafford will be on a practice squad somewhere. -In 2030, Sanchez will be inducted into the HOF. I agree. I think they'd be wise to take the top OT, and then maybe try to trade up their second first rounder for Freeman. Too much money involved in the #1 pick to risk it on an uncertain QB prospect. The OT should at least be a solid starter for years to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 If you never draft a QB in the first round, you will never have a bust. You also probably will never have a franchise QB, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Josh Freeman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 If you never draft a QB in the first round, you will never have a bust. You also probably will never have a franchise QB, either. First round is different than #1 overall. You really need to be sure at that spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 If Matt Cassel taught us anything, it's that you dont need that many starts ( or any at all) to be a good QB in the NFL. Sanchez will benefit from playing at USC where they run a pro style offense. He will probably have a more immediate impact than Stafford will, but we'll see. But Cassel was comfrotable learning from Brady. It's not like he was a rookie coming into week 2 last season. I like Sanchez, I think he's going to be a great QB. I don't think trading up for him is something we need to do, because we have a lot of holes to fill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 1. Sanchez 2. Freeman 3. Stafford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.