Blackout Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Why don't you post the way you think the Jets could get that done so we can tear the idea apart with specifics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted April 22, 2009 Author Share Posted April 22, 2009 trade a first rounder and 3rd for 2009 to arizona then trade kerry rhodes + 2010 3rd rounder for Edwards (who clearly is not wanted there there. super-bowl! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midget Love 20 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Kerry Rhodes < 1st round value. Edwards would demand a 1st at least and then probably a 2nd rounder. The Boldin trade would work out, but we'll be spending 4 picks, two 1st rounders for the same position. Include the long term contracts we'd need to sign to justify the trade, each player will be looking for 7-10 mil per. So essentially we're spending 14 mil + on two players at the same position, and still have Cotchery on our roster and a question mark at QB. And aren't we supposed to become a run-oriented team behind our OL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted April 22, 2009 Author Share Posted April 22, 2009 lol well clearly the Giants aren't willing to meet his demands KERry Rhodes + 2nd roudner and Thaijet's fanship. the Browns can have you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midget Love 20 Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Kerry Rhodes < 1st round value. Edwards would demand a 1st at least and then probably a 2nd rounder. The Boldin trade would work out, but we'll be spending 4 picks, two 1st rounders for the same position. Include the long term contracts we'd need to sign to justify the trade, each player will be looking for 7-10 mil per. So essentially we're spending 14 mil + on two players at the same position, and still have Cotchery on our roster and a question mark at QB. And aren't we supposed to become a run-oriented team behind our OL? I believe the story was that the Browns wanted a 2nd, 5th and ****ty WR (the bad Steve Smith) for Edwards. With BO's moronic idea we should still have the 2nd and 5th. I'm not sure we have a ****ty WR the caliber of the bad Steve Smith to offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Never post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOZ THE JET Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 if we trade for edwards and boldin what are we suppose to do with cotchery and his contract?.........stop playing madden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyHector Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 While we're at it, why not offer Brett Ratliff and our 2014 2nd Rounder for Peyton Manning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ I believe the story was that the Browns wanted a 2nd, 5th and ****ty WR (the bad Steve Smith) for Edwards. With BO's moronic idea we should still have the 2nd and 5th. I'm not sure we have a ****ty WR the caliber of the bad Steve Smith to offer. Why can't we just give up a 2nd, 5th, and Brad Smith? By the way Blackout, I honestly think something is wrong with you. Please seek help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Why can't we just give up a 2nd, 5th, and Brad Smith? By the way Blackout, I honestly think something is wrong with you. Please seek help. Because the bad Steve Smith is better than Brad Smith? +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted April 22, 2009 Author Share Posted April 22, 2009 YOU TOOL, THEY WERE IN TALKS OF TRADING FOR HIM on you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.