Jump to content

Jets Trade Rumor On WFAN


GFJET33

Recommended Posts

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="

"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 249
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I've spent the last half hour watching videos of this kid and I can tell you this; Matt Leinart and Mark Sanchez should ONLY be mentioned in the same sentence when it comes to their alma mater. Sanchez has a gun-ML? pop gun

Sanchez has "it." I have a gut feeling he will be a great QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually wouldnt mind this. but not for sanchez. my thought process is the jets make this trade, and hoopefully sanches goes to seattle. that means crabtree could be there at 8 which would be worth the trade. if not im sure maclin would be there who is still a great addition. if hes goes as well I would say get receiver, but we couldve got that receiver at 17. basically a hit or miss deal which is why you wait until the jags are on the clock.

and what if that 1 player hurts her vagina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Cotchery is the superior receiver at this point in their careers. Everyone gets an excuse in 2007 except for Cotch? I'm not claiming he is a #1 reciever, but neither is Coles.

Well cotch's excuse would be known as the peter principle. ANd it's perfectly valid, but also a reason why we don't want to go into 2009 with him as our #1..

Eh, the KC game should not have come to that. His pick 6 in the 4th quarter nearly crippled us.

Favre was far too inconsistent in the first 11 weeks to be given the compliment of playing "very well." He had his shining moments, but he had his fair share of disasters as well. He didn't start getting rave reviews until the NE and Tennessee games.

WE were 8-3 and lost a game to SD in which we were bombarded by the opposing offense, lost a close game in Oakland that Favre tied at the end and then watched Chris Baker fall down when victory was there, and finally lost to NE in week 2primarily due to Mangina...

Meanwhile, we were (from memory) #3 in scoring, he was second in the league in TD passes, we were at or near the top in TOP, 3rd down conversion, Yards per drive, etc..

And this is cosnidering that he was 39 and was playing catch with highschoolers in late July! If he was Chad Pennington, you'd probably be saying it was the greatest 11 game span in league history ;)

As I said, given the circumstances he played very well. None of which excuses the abomination that was the last 5 weeks mind you..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Less starts means less information upon which to base a decision as to whether he can play. It's not as though the Bengals took Akili Smith knowing that he was awful.

Actually Akili Smith is a great comparison because he too came out early after one flash in the pan successful junior season. QB's with very little college experience tend to go the way of Akili Smith if they are thrust right into the starting job as a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well cotch's excuse would be known as the peter principle. ANd it's perfectly valid, but also a reason why we don't want to go into 2009 with him as our #1..

WE were 8-3 and lost a game to SD in which we were bombarded by the opposing offense, lost a close game in Oakland that Favre tied at the end and then watched Chris Baker fall down when victory was there, and finally lost to NE in week 2primarily due to Mangina...

Meanwhile, we were (from memory) #3 in scoring, he was second in the league in TD passes, we were at or near the top in TOP, 3rd down conversion, Yards per drive, etc..

And this is cosnidering that he was 39 and was playing catch with highschoolers in late July! If he was Chad Pennington, you'd probably be saying it was the greatest 11 game span in league history ;)

As I said, given the circumstances he played very well. None of which excuses the abomination that was the last 5 weeks mind you..

I still say Favre was as much of a liability as he was an asset. The main point is that our offense is not as bad as advertised. Losing an inconsistent Favre and an aging and declining Coles is not the end of the world.

Add in a franchise QB and we could be in decent shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually Akili Smith is a great comparison because he too came out early after one flash in the pan successful junior season. QB's with very little college experience tend to go the way of Akili Smith if they are thrust right into the starting job as a rookie.

But Sanchez's one year was in a pro style offense with pro level coaching. A little different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This trade, at this time, is sooooo wrong on so many different levels.

You don't trade to a spot in the draft 4 days before the draft for a specific player that will likely be taken 3 to 4 spots ahead of you.

Draft day trade when player is there is the ONLY move that makes sense.

JAX would also have us by our BALLS if that was the case. We might have to pay even more.

I simply don't value draft picks the way most of you do. Yes we have done well in recent years with some mid-to-late round picks such as Leon, Rhodes, and Cotchery. However, for every one of those names there is Anthony Schlegal, Eric Smith, Brad Smith, Victor Hobson, Jon McGraw, Adrian Jones, BJ Askew, Sione Pouha, Mike Nugent, Alan Harper, and Derrick Straight.

We would be swapping 1st round picks with whoever we trade with so I'm not going to list any 1st rounders (but we have some doozies like Bryan Thomas, Vernon Gholston, and DeWayne Robertson I could list here if we were going to).

So, if we were swapping 1st round picks and giving up a 2nd and 4th in order to do it - the chances of the 2nd and 4th are a LOT LESS LIKELY to be David Harris and Kerry Rhodes and much more likely to be Justin Miller and Adrian Jones or some combination of most the bums I listed at the end of the first paragraph.

If Sanchez is the next Matt Ryan, is Jon McGraw and Derrick Straight too high of a price to pay? Not if you ask me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad, I'm not too happy about the drop-off after the top ten, and this isn't a deep enough draft to get all worked up over in regards to a missing 2nd rounder. I'd take Sanchez, Crabtree, or Raji quite happily...especially with the way Ryan made use of having 2 starting caliber 3-4 NT's on his past roster. However, I'd rather do the 2010 3rd rounder simply due to the fact that we've had a ton of luck in the 4th round over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Antonio Bryant had one good season after doing nothing for a couple of years and he's better than Jerricho Cotchery? And until we see how Holt does at 32 with knee problems, I'm not ready to say that Cotchery isn't better either. And even if Holt still is, I'll take Stuckey over anything Jacksonville has after Holt. :yes:

antonio bryant is head and shoulders above cotchery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say it, but this is a pretty weak draft and it reminds me of the DRob year. We packaged picks to move up partially because of the weakness of the draft. We tried to get one of the top 10 guys...it didn't work. This draft is not that much different from that one. I think you will see late draft picks that get cut by their teams in camp because it is so weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

flacco?????

he hasnt lit the world on fire,,ravens D was a HUGE part of his success..ryan is a stud i agree

Exactly. Put Flacco on last year's Jets and start him immediately and he'd be considered a collosal bust. It's nice when your D makes you look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the problem with this whole rumor;

If the Jets want sanchez, they need to trade up to #3

giving up all those picks to get to #8 doesn't guarantee them sanchez

also, how do these leaks work ? are we supposed to believe the jags GM is using the media to put pressure on tanny ?

belive it when I see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see making this trade before the draft if there's a wide range of players we're looking at. Jeremy Maclin, for example, would be a great fallback at 9. Tyson Jackson may be there if we want him. Presuming the two top tackles and the two top quarterbacks are going top 7, you're going to have Maclin, Raji, Crabtree, Curry, and Tyson Jackson. So there's going to be somebody that either fills a big need and/or presents good value at 8.

I could see the logic behind it if we feel comfortable, given really worst case is one of the top tackles slips to us and only one of the 5 guys I listed available. We're probably banking on Maclin, Crabtree, Raji, or Sanchez being there with a possibility of getting boned but figuring it's not the worst case scenario. Thing is, if we give up the 4th we're basically giving up our entire draft. We pick at 8 and then in the third, sixth, and seventh rounds. Unless we're content to just come out of this draft with a QB, WR, or lineman along with a guy like Richard Quinn in the third and two depth picks after that, I don't see that trade happening. Or we'd have to have something in place to move 76 for some stuff in the fourth/fifth range.

I could absolutely see giving up 52 to move up though, it's definitely in no mans land. Just not the fourth also, given we're already missing the fifth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly... There's that too. Add it all up, us trading our entire draft to move up 9 spots in rd 1 is STUPID unless we know with absolute certainty who is going to be on the board at 8.

NOONE WILL BE THERE AT 8 BETTER THAN BOLDIN!!!! My G-D, the stupidity, the utter stupidity. This love affair with picks over proven Studs is amazing!!!!

Even when we had FOUR first rounders what did it do for us??????? Everyone hated Penny,Abraham gave us about 20 good games,Ellis has been mediocre for 9 years and Becht!

Who have we drafted this DECADE better than Boldin? Revis? anyone else.

Why this love affair with picks, and if so,trade the f%$K down, get more.

Do we ALWAYS have to do this draft thing. Brady=6, Terrell davis=6, Chrebet, walked on, Rudy-style.

Cotchery=4th, come on.Leon=4,Coles 72 overall(whatever round) The draft is a Casino.Boldin is Cash.

Was Brick worth a #4? really? really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PLEASE don't make this trade Jets, if anything, I'd want them trade down, not up.

exactly, get more lottery tickets, because that's all they are.

The EXPERTS,the guys who do nothing but evaluate talent ALL f---ing day for a living thought Ryan Leaf was a "can't miss" Mr.Kiper thought David Carr was a guarantee! and someone on this board is unemployed while he drives a mercedes.

The draft is craps. I don't give a dam. You take the proven guy!!!.

Cotchery/Boldin not good enough?? please tell me why and PLEASE let them put 8 in the box against those two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade up and end up drafting Maclin or Crabtree, it will immediately be one of the dumbest moves in franchise history, because we could have had Boldin or Edwards for a lesser cost.

Goddamn right. If this trade happens and we end up with a freaking WR at that price, that WR HAS TO make the Hall of Fame to justify the cost.

Regrettably, this smacks exactly of what our nitwit GM would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Benigno just reported that the jags wanna get a deal done today with the jets where the jets would send their 1st, 2nd, and 4th round picks to the jags for their 1st rounder.

If they dont get it done today, the jags are asking for our 1st, 2nd, and 2010 3rd round pick in exchange for their 1st rounder.

Way too big of a price. DO NOT DO THIS JETS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly, get more lottery tickets, because that's all they are.

The EXPERTS,the guys who do nothing but evaluate talent ALL f---ing day for a living thought Ryan Leaf was a "can't miss" Mr.Kiper thought David Carr was a guarantee! and someone on this board is unemployed while he drives a mercedes.

The draft is craps. I don't give a dam. You take the proven guy!!!.

Cotchery/Boldin not good enough?? please tell me why and PLEASE let them put 8 in the box against those two.

Good post. I 100% agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...