afosomf Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 This is not good. If Sanchez is staring down Braylon again this week instead of the Bills getting 4 INT's when he does that, Asomougha will have 10 INT's. Clearly if we throw the ball more than 20 times Sunday, Schott should be SHOT. If we're throwing, throw screens & dump offs to Leon. i predict no more than 2 passes past 10 yds don't blink..gaydars aren't throwing either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillerPaul Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 This is not good. If Sanchez is staring down Braylon again this week instead of the Bills getting 4 INT's when he does that, Asomougha will have 10 INT's. Clearly if we throw the ball more than 20 times Sunday, Schott should be SHOT. If we're throwing, throw screens & dump offs to Leon. That's one reason why I thought getting an Edwards or Marshall was not such a good thing for the Jets. Ya can't have the rookie thinking, 'well we got this guy now I gotta get him the ball' too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 That's one reason why I thought getting an Edwards or Marshall was not such a good thing for the Jets. Ya can't have the rookie thinking, 'well we got this guy now I gotta get him the ball' too much. Um... what? It was a great move IF your #2 receiver, Jerricho Cotchery, is healthy. It only is a negative when Cotchery is not in the lineup. With J-Co in the lineup, it's fine because Mark then has two capable receivers out there, along with Leon Washington and Dustin Keller for check downs. Without J-Co, then he will force it to Edwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillerPaul Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 Um... what? It was a great move IF your #2 receiver, Jerricho Cotchery, is healthy. It only is a negative when Cotchery is not in the lineup. With J-Co in the lineup, it's fine because Mark then has two capable receivers out there, along with Leon Washington and Dustin Keller for check downs. Without J-Co, then he will force it to Edwards. I still don't think it was a great move. Maybe after Sanchez has a year or so under his belt, to add an Edwards would have made more sense to me. I think what you have now is a rookie QB trying to adjust to a new WR mid-season. Ya think that's not affecting the kid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I still don't think it was a great move. Maybe after Sanchez has a year or so under his belt, to add an Edwards would have made more sense to me. I think what you have now is a rookie QB trying to adjust to a new WR mid-season. Ya think that's not affecting the kid? Better to have the kid have 2 NFL Wide Receivers rather than 1. Everyone else after Cotchery and Edwards do not belong on NFL rosters. Well, maybe Brad Smith, but only as a Special Teams player and on offense strictly for reverses only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I still don't think it was a great move. Maybe after Sanchez has a year or so under his belt, to add an Edwards would have made more sense to me. I think what you have now is a rookie QB trying to adjust to a new WR mid-season. Ya think that's not affecting the kid? some, but the loss of cotchery is much more significant add the two together, and it's not pretty I think the jets struck because the asking price presumably went down after the bar fight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 I still don't think it was a great move. Maybe after Sanchez has a year or so under his belt, to add an Edwards would have made more sense to me. I think what you have now is a rookie QB trying to adjust to a new WR mid-season. Ya think that's not affecting the kid? If we did not trade for Edwards, we'd be going into Oakland with David Clowney (5 rec, 98 yards for his career) and Wallace Wright (6 rec, 87 yards for his career, all in 2007) as our #1 and #2 options. I didn't leave out TDs, neither has one. When you look at it that way... We had no choice but to make this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillerPaul Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 If we did not trade for Edwards, we'd be going into Oakland with David Clowney (5 rec, 98 yards for his career) and Wallace Wright (6 rec, 87 yards for his career, all in 2007) as our #1 and #2 options. I didn't leave out TDs, neither has one. When you look at it that way... We had no choice but to make this trade. Valid point. I'm thinking it just added more to the rookie's plate and prolly will take a few weeks for them to get the repetition/comfort level with each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 http://www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2009/10/ny_jets_wrs_jerricho_cotchery_1.html per Rotoworld: Jets coach Rex Ryan ruled out Jerricho Cotchery (hamstring) for Week 7 at Oakland Friday. Brad Smith (foot) was also ruled out, so David Clowney will pick up another start after finishing Week 6 without a target. Clowney will likely see quite a bit of Nnamdi Asomugha Sunday and isn't a fantasy option. Braylon Edwards gets a slight bump. He's certain to be the Jets' most targeted wideout. Oct. 23 - 12:41 pm et CRAP ! I was hoping this thread was left over from last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted October 24, 2009 Share Posted October 24, 2009 That's one reason why I thought getting an Edwards or Marshall was not such a good thing for the Jets. Ya can't have the rookie thinking, 'well we got this guy now I gotta get him the ball' too much. Dude, sthu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillerPaul Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Dude, sthu. Hey DLJ where the hell ya been ? Long time no see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Hey DLJ where the hell ya been ? Long time no see. Chillin dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Jet Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 How bad is the Jets WR situation still if the loss of Brad Smith = a loss? lol c'mon Wally World! Make it all (W)right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gyno-Tony Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Dude, sthu. you is all piss in vinegar lady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Disaster, just going to make our bust QB even worse. Let the one dimensional offense continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 Disaster, just going to make our bust QB even worse. Let the one dimensional offense continue. PHUCK U skippy...find another team no one wants to hear your crap all day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.