Jetfan13 Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 He did? OH my bad BWAHAHHA friggin big mouth, ZERO tackles, one pressure...I think its time Sparano calls thjis guy and tells him either shut up or sit..Guy has the ballsto try and deflect all the trash talk to others, well at least MOST of the others back it up, this guy is just an old joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 He's no Gholston, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted November 9, 2009 Author Share Posted November 9, 2009 He's no Gholston, that's for sure. youre Ghoslton doesn't go around telling everyone how good is and then sucks during the ...he just sucka quietly, unlike your boy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 youre Ghoslton doesn't go around telling everyone how good is and then sucks during the ...he just sucka quietly, unlike your boy Well, Porter dors have double the sacks Bart Scott has. What does that tell you about the suckage of the almighty Bart Scott? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 look 1-3, the only reason the Pats won yesterday was because the Dolphins LET them win... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted November 9, 2009 Author Share Posted November 9, 2009 a part of an article from the Sun-Sentinel this morning: "As a team we got pressure on them," Porter said, referring to the two sacks the Dolphins got on Tom Brady, "But not enough! We could have made more plays out there. But it wasn't the lack of pass rush why we lost the game. We had our opportunities to win the game. They played good, were ready for us, and beat us. In joey speak this means..."IT WASN'T MY FAULT, THE OFFENSE SUCKED" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowmoe57 Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 look 1-3, the only reason the Pats won yesterday was because the Dolphins LET them win... Your wrong they were looking past the Pats for next weeks showdown with Tampa Bay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted November 9, 2009 Author Share Posted November 9, 2009 Well, Porter dors have double the sacks Bart Scott has. What does that tell you about the suckage of the almighty Bart Scott? It tells me we have players to pick up the slack when one guy is neutralized, unlike your dol-fags who have no-one lets see, 1st Gholston, now Scott, who will you try to divert your arguement to next? Typical, get calledout and try to change the subject. R u sure youre not Tx in disguise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Well, Porter dors have double the sacks Bart Scott has. What does that tell you about the suckage of the almighty Bart Scott? That Scott, who has four and a half times the number of tackles Joey Porter has, is actually earning his paycheck while Joey just cries like the little bitch he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mari0k Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 I believe his contract expires after this year and he is a goner. That, or he will have to agree to play for ALOT less money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mari0k Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 That Scott, who has four and a half times the number of tackles Joey Porter has, is actually earning his paycheck while Joey just cries like the little bitch he is. Its pointless to compare their stats. OLBS = More Sacks, less tackles. ILBS = Less Sacks, more tackles. I already said it, and will say it again. After this season Joey will either take a pay cut, or will talk in another uniform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Its pointless to compare their stats. OLBS = More Sacks, less tackles. ILBS = Less Sacks, more tackles. I already said it, and will say it again. After this season Joey will either take a pay cut, or will talk in another uniform. Ummmm, talk to your buddy drowningfish. He was the one making the comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mari0k Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Ummmm, talk to your buddy drowningfish. He was the one making the comparison. You both compared their stats. I was just pointing out the obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 That Scott, who has four and a half times the number of tackles Joey Porter has, is actually earning his paycheck while Joey just cries like the little bitch he is. Ummmm, talk to your buddy drowningfish. He was the one making the comparison. Lets see, 8.2 million dollars for 09' divided by 52 combined tackles... That's $157,692.30 per tackle. Yeah, I'd say he's earning his money. Guy should be arrested for theft. Porter too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Well, Porter dors have double the sacks Bart Scott has. What does that tell you about the suckage of the almighty Bart Scott? That OLB's typically get more sacks, and more opportunities to rush the passer than ILBs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 That OLB's typically get more sacks, and more opportunities to rush the passer than ILBs? They DO?????!!!!!????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 They DO?????!!!!!????? I read that in a book once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Lets see, 8.2 million dollars for 09' divided by 52 combined tackles... That's $157,692.30 per tackle. Yeah, I'd say he's earning his money. Guy should be arrested for theft. Porter too. Umm... you're an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Umm... you're an idiot. Why? Cause I used a calculator? I have news for you, barely anybody does math by hand these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexRyanRules Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Lets see, 8.2 million dollars for 09' divided by 52 combined tackles... That's $157,692.30 per tackle. Yeah, I'd say he's earning his money. Guy should be arrested for theft. Porter too. Uhhhhh. 52 tackles in 8 games is very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Why? Cause I used a calculator? I have news for you, barely anybody does math by hand these days. If you really need me to spell out all that is wrong with your post about how much the Jets were paying per tackle for Bart Scott, it simply proves that I am 100% correct and you are, indeed, an idiot. Scott is an ILB on pace to get more than 100 tackles this season. That's his job. Not to mention his leadership and his experience in the defense. Not to mention that he has about 20 tackles for a loss this year which is insane. Not to mention your moronic equation which is not only a ridiculously stupid way to judge a defensive player, it also doesn't allow for the FACT that there are 8 games left so your numbers are off by at least 50% jagoff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Uhhhhh. 52 tackles in 8 games is very good. It could mean alot of things. It could mean that your D-line isn't doing it's job and is allowing more runners to get to the second level to the linebackers. It could also be a symptom of your system. If Ryan's defense crowds the line alot, which it does, it allows the linebackers to be closer to the line of scrimmage enabling a better chance at a tackle. Also, teams don't like throwing to Revis, so shorter passes are necissary when playing the Jets, thereby introducing the linebackers to the game more. Same thing in Miami, just a different set of players. Miamis' top 2 tacklers are our saftey'. Why? Cause teams enjoy testing our secondary and Crowder sucks in pass coverage over the middle opening up the safteys' for more tackles. The system a player's in and their supporting cast dictate a players numbers. While Scott does have alot of tackles, it's not necissarily proof that he's good. Yeramiah Bell has 57 tackles on the year, but I'd never take that as a reason that he's good. Same thing with Gerbril Wilson, he has 50 tackles and we all know he sucks. Kinda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 If you really need me to spell out all that is wrong with your post about how much the Jets were paying per tackle for Bart Scott, it simply proves that I am 100% correct and you are, indeed, an idiot. Scott is an ILB on pace to get more than 100 tackles this season. That's his job. Not to mention his leadership and his experience in the defense. Not to mention that he has about 20 tackles for a loss this year which is insane. Not to mention your moronic equation which is not only a ridiculously stupid way to judge a defensive player, it also doesn't allow for the FACT that there are 8 games left so your numbers are off by at least 50% jagoff. See my above post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mari0k Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Yeramiah Bell has 57 tackles on the year, but I'd never take that as a reason that he's good. Same thing with Gerbril Wilson, he has 50 tackles and we all know he sucks. Kinda. Difference being that Scott is ILB, and his job is making tackles, and Bell & Wilson are Safeties? It is not as bad as the numbers show, because we run quarters, which allowes safeties play closer to the LOS sometimes, but the fact that they lead the team in tackles is ****ty never the less. In 3-4 dl isn't supposed to make tackles, they are supposed to occupy the line, freeing up LBs (like Scott) to make tackles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Difference being that Scott is ILB, and his job is making tackles, and Bell & Wilson are Safeties? It is not as bad as the numbers show, because we run quarters, which allowes safeties play closer to the LOS sometimes, but the fact that they lead the team in tackles is ****ty never the less. In 3-4 dl isn't supposed to make tackles, they are supposed to occupy the line, freeing up LBs (like Scott) to make tackles. Holy cow. After a Dolphins loss MarioK actually shows up to talk football instead of crap. I look forward to much more contribution in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Difference being that Scott is ILB, and his job is making tackles, and Bell & Wilson are Safeties? It is not as bad as the numbers show, because we run quarters, which allowes safeties play closer to the LOS sometimes, but the fact that they lead the team in tackles is ****ty never the less. In 3-4 dl isn't supposed to make tackles, they are supposed to occupy the line, freeing up LBs (like Scott) to make tackles. I think it's more of an indication of different defensive philosophies. Ryan's defenses love crowding the line of scrimmage, while Miami employs the "bend don't break" defense, which I'm really beginning to hate. We give up more unnecissary yards than other defenses because of our philosophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mari0k Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Holy cow. After a Dolphins loss MarioK actually shows up to talk football instead of crap. I look forward to much more contribution in the future. What? **** you jets suck I think it's more of an indication of different defensive philosophies. Ryan's defenses love crowding the line of scrimmage, while Miami employs the "bend don't break" defense, which I'm really beginning to hate. We give up more unnecissary yards than other defenses because of our philosophy. Rex Ryan's D is a cimplcated 3-4. But ultimetly, its a 3-4. ILBs make tackles, thats the point. Its like when Zach was in Miami, and consistently was top 5 in tackles. Our scheme freed him up, he was able to read the play, and arrive theere with the ball carrier. Our secondary runs quarters, which allowes safeties (in some situations) play closer to LOS. But lets not fool ourselves, Bell leads the team in tackles because receivers consitently make receptions in front of them. Yeseterday was a perfect example. We don't just "give up more yards than necessary" We give up more big plays than any other teams. We have a 10 min drive, then Brady just tosses it to Moss in a crossing pattern, Moss jabs Davis and off he goes. 80 yards in matter of seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinnys025 Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 It could mean alot of things. It could mean that your D-line isn't doing it's job and is allowing more runners to get to the second level to the linebackers. It could also be a symptom of your system. If Ryan's defense crowds the line alot, which it does, it allows the linebackers to be closer to the line of scrimmage enabling a better chance at a tackle. Also, teams don't like throwing to Revis, so shorter passes are necissary when playing the Jets, thereby introducing the linebackers to the game more. Same thing in Miami, just a different set of players. Miamis' top 2 tacklers are our saftey'. Why? Cause teams enjoy testing our secondary and Crowder sucks in pass coverage over the middle opening up the safteys' for more tackles. The system a player's in and their supporting cast dictate a players numbers. While Scott does have alot of tackles, it's not necissarily proof that he's good. Yeramiah Bell has 57 tackles on the year, but I'd never take that as a reason that he's good. Same thing with Gerbril Wilson, he has 50 tackles and we all know he sucks. Kinda. I don't feel like reading all of your nonsense, but I can sum it up in two words. LAST PLACE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Let's see here... Joey Porter - 12 total tackles, 2.5 sacks, in 7 games Calvin Pace - 24 total tackles, 3.0 sacks, in 4 games and they play the same position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted November 9, 2009 Author Share Posted November 9, 2009 Let's see here... Joey Porter - 12 total tackles, 2.5 sacks, in 7 games Calvin Pace - 24 total tackles, 3.0 sacks, in 4 games and they play the same position. great find...+100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Let's see here... Joey Porter - 12 total tackles, 2.5 sacks, in 7 games Calvin Pace - 24 total tackles, 3.0 sacks, in 4 games and they play the same position. Wanna trade OLB's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Wanna trade OLB's? No thanks. I'd rather have Pace and Thomas than Peezy and the Homo. Porter runs his mouth before the game and then does absolutely nothing, and twinkle-toes waits until the game is over to run his mouth by badmouthing...the fans. You can keep them both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 No thanks. I'd rather have Pace and Thomas than Peezy and the Homo. Porter runs his mouth before the game and then does absolutely nothing, and twinkle-toes waits until the game is over to run his mouth by badmouthing...the fans. You can keep them both. Truth be told, I like our linebackers better anyways. None of ours have been suspended for using steroids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 Truth be told, I like our linebackers better anyways. None of ours have been suspended for using steroids. So they haven't been caught. None of the Dolphins LBs are any good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 So they haven't been caught. None of the Dolphins LBs are any good. Let me ask you this. Were they good enough to sweep the Jets in 09'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.