Kentucky Jet Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Has New York tossed Super Bowl chances away? By IRA KAUFMAN | The Tampa Tribune Published: March 16, 2010 TAMPA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Screw Roger Goodell anyway KJ-he's never done one good thing for this team yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetscanes331 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 So basically, pure speculation based on how he thinks Goodell may or may not feel. Meanwhile nothing Woody said was wrong at all. Seems silly to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 they'll never host a superbowl in a cold weather city that has an open stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 they'll never host a superbowl in a cold weather city that has an open stadium. You are correct Sir. The NFL has a cold weather rule where the SB game will not be hosted in a region/city where temps are less than 50 degrees for the game. NY Fed up big time not doming the new house. I like football outdoors too, and in any climate, but from a revenue generating standpoint it made so much sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 You are correct Sir. The NFL has a cold weather rule where the SB game will not be hosted in a region/city where temps are less than 50 degrees for the game. NY Fed up big time not doming the new house. I like football outdoors too, and in any climate, but from a revenue generating standpoint it made so much sense. No they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I'm no Goodell fan, but to think he'd shoot down the Super Bowl bid strictly on the basis of Woody ripping him is absolutely moronic. The guy isn't THAT big of a douche. It doesn't mean they'll get it, but if not that won't be the reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I'm no Goodell fan, but to think he'd shoot down the Super Bowl bid strictly on the basis of Woody ripping him is absolutely moronic. The guy isn't THAT big of a douche. It doesn't mean they'll get it, but if not that won't be the reason. No, but it makes for an more interesting story than not wanting to play the game in cold weather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeWillie Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Just an attempt to stir some bad efeelings towards NY. Look where the author is from ... just coincidently from Tampa, town who also has a bid in for the same game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 No they don't. Yep The NFL has temporarily waived a requirement that Super Bowl sites must either have temperatures above 50 degrees in February or have a domed stadium. League Commissioner Roger Goodell also has spoken favorably about the idea of a New Jersey Super Bowl despite the risk that a major snowstorm could wreak havoc with fans flying to the game from around the country. http://www.northjersey.com/sports/031510_NJ_lawmakers_to_push_for_2014_Super_Bowl_at_Meadowlands_Stadium_.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I like football outdoors too, and in any climate, but from a revenue generating standpoint it made so much sense. Explain how a Super Bowl in an outdoors stadium in the NYC-metro area is worse from a revenue generating standpoint than a Super Bowl in a dome in Detroit or Minnesota. Thanks. Your own Bobby Kraft is pushing a Meadowlands SB hard, presumably so he can get one for himself one day. I think it happens. I'm no Goodell fan, but to think he'd shoot down the Super Bowl bid strictly on the basis of Woody ripping him is absolutely moronic. The guy isn't THAT big of a douche. It doesn't mean they'll get it, but if not that won't be the reason. Even if he was, he still has to wash the Mara's balls. This will have 0 effect on the commissioner's recommendation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Yep The NFL has temporarily waived a requirement that Super Bowl sites must either have temperatures above 50 degrees in February or have a domed stadium. League Commissioner Roger Goodell also has spoken favorably about the idea of a New Jersey Super Bowl despite the risk that a major snowstorm could wreak havoc with fans flying to the game from around the country. http://www.northjersey.com/sports/031510_NJ_lawmakers_to_push_for_2014_Super_Bowl_at_Meadowlands_Stadium_.html So you're saying they don't have that rule. That's what I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I don't give a **** about this... I don't want to host one. I want to win one. What a ****ing E! channel article... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Explain how a Super Bowl in an outdoors stadium in the NYC-metro area is worse from a revenue generating standpoint than a Super Bowl in a dome in Detroit or Minnesota. Thanks. Revenue in terms of other venues. IE: Jerry Jones. Concerts, NBA Allstar, NFL Combine, Soccer, Arena Football Your own Bobby Kraft is pushing a Meadowlands SB hard, presumably so he can get one for himself one day. I think it happens. I think it does not happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 So you're saying they don't have that rule. That's what I thought. No, the NFL temporarily lifted the rule so Woody could bid on a SB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 No, the NFL temporarily lifted the rule so Woody could bid on a SB. So at the moment, there is no rule. Got it. That's what I said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 So at the moment, there is no rule. Got it. That's what I said. The more you spin the deeper in quicksand you sink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 The more you spin the deeper in quicksand you sink. No spin. You said there was a rule, I said there wasn't, you confirmed there isn't. Where's the spin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 One fundemental flaw in this whole discussion is the premise the Godell decides where the superbowl is. He doesn't. It is voted on by the owners. If Godell is upset with the Jets he could get revenge other ways, but not via a superbowl that will never happen anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 If Goodell has proven one thing in his tenure it is this: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE BENJAMIN'S! If there was a chance that the NFL could generate huge revenues, he would hold the Superbowl at the North Pole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 If Goodell has proven one thing in his tenure it is this: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE BENJAMIN'S! If there was a chance that the NFL could generate huge revenues, he would hold the Superbowl at the North Pole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Goodell has been a complete disaster imo. What made Tagliabue successful is that he kept his hands off what was already a great product. Goodell just cares about trying to improve the bottom line...regardless how the true fans feel. It sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Wasn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 From the article: Reading is fundamental. If that's the case, then you should reread my statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 If that's the case, then you should reread my statement. I accidentily replied to the wrong person. That was meant for the troll: Schmuckboywearsagreyhoodie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 One fundemental flaw in this whole discussion is the premise the Godell decides where the superbowl is. He doesn't. It is voted on by the owners. If Godell is upset with the Jets he could get revenge other ways, but not via a superbowl that will never happen anyway. From the article: Goodell's recommendation to owners is considered critical to the New York bid. Reading is fundamental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 I accidentily replied to the wrong person. That was meant for the troll: Schmuckboywearsagreyhoodie. No problem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Woody doesn't give a sh-t about the Super Bowl at the new stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newjakecity Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Goodell has been a complete disaster imo. What made Tagliabue successful is that he kept his hands off what was already a great product. Goodell just cares about trying to improve the bottom line...regardless how the true fans feel. It sucks As bad as Goodell has been, I think Tagliabue was actually much worse. The same good ol boys network that we saw this past weekend was even worse when he was commissioner. The one thing he managed to do was make the owner's much richer, but as a fan can't say I give two s***s about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 they'll never host a superbowl in a cold weather city that has an open stadium. Truth. If we were hit with a blizzard like a few weeks ago during Super Bowl weekend it would be a complete debacle.You would have thousands of fans and media traveling in dangerous conditions. Yes, statistically the odds are against it happening, but it's still a possibility. It's a stupid idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 ...the May vote is likely to come down to a competition between Tampa Bay and the Meadowlands, where the average high in early February is 39 degrees. I just now realized that this is from a Tampa newspaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Goodell has been a complete disaster imo. What made Tagliabue successful is that he kept his hands off what was already a great product. Goodell just cares about trying to improve the bottom line...regardless how the true fans feel. It sucks Like Tags insisting Johnson hire moron Herman Edwards after the NFL deemed his offer better than that of the Dolans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny green balls Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 good for woody, he's completely right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Like Tags insisting Johnson hire moron Herman Edwards after the NFL deemed his offer better than that of the Dolans? That was never proven to be true. But, Tags was mostly hands off. Goodell has moved the draft from Noon Saturday- to 3 Saturday now to prime time Thursday night. Terrible. Insisiting on football in Europe- terrible. And were looking at a lockout under his watch next season. Goodell hasnt brough one positive thing to the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 That was never proven to be true. But, Tags was mostly hands off. Goodell has moved the draft from Noon Saturday- to 3 Saturday now to prime time Thursday night. Terrible. Insisiting on football in Europe- terrible. And were looking at a lockout under his watch next season. Goodell hasnt brough one positive thing to the league. More than anything what I find ridiculous is the complete inequity of how players are treated. Goodell has consistently made example of some players while letting others completely off the hook. He takes any chance he can to hang a player out to dry if they either have a bad reputation and he can make it look like he's taking a tough stand OR its a no-name player who he can screw over without causing too much stir. If its a situation where he might get backlash for disciplining a player or he think he can get good publicity out of letting a player off easy (e.g., the early removal of Vick's suspension), then he's all over it. There is absolutely no consistency in any of his decision making and that alone makes anything he says or does completely arbitrary and unreliable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.