NIGHT STALKER Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Yes, even an elder statesman like me has a question...now, I realize we all have opinions and this is why the question. Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Maybe I was a prude in my hay day, but if I didn't find the woman to be physiclally attractive, I wouldn't even make the attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Yes, even an elder statesman like me has a question...now, I realize we all have opinions and this is why the question. Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Maybe I was a prude in my hay day, but if I didn't find the woman to be physiclally attractive, I wouldn't even make the attempt. Yes I can, and have. However, it's way better when there's an attraction. IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted April 17, 2010 Author Share Posted April 17, 2010 Yes I can, and have. However, it's way better when there's an attraction. IMO Wow...I think of all the sex I have missed through the years...it would be interesting to see if women felt the same way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Wow...I think of all the sex I have missed through the years...it would be interesting to see if women felt the same way. They do, they just hide it better. I'm speaking of the younger generation though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greeneyedlady Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 I have. Women are different creatures. Think about the women who have been with Hugh Hefner. He is not a handsome man. Those women can't possibly find him physically attractive. To each his (or her) own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 attraction not required when alcohol is involved.. soft and warm is enuf plus .. the less attractive they are the more the do to please.. it's like guys who don't get any, the first time they get a girl they kiss their ass, buy them everything and get walked all over. Same happens to girls, but in the bedroom.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted April 17, 2010 Author Share Posted April 17, 2010 I have. Women are different creatures. Think about the women who have been with Hugh Hefner. He is not a handsome man. Those women can't possibly find him physically attractive. To each his (or her) own. Okay green eyed lady...LOL...he is filthy rich though baby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 attraction not required when alcohol is involved.. soft and warm is enuf plus .. the less attractive they are the more the do to please.. it's like guys who don't get any, the first time they get a girl they kiss their ass, buy them everything and get walked all over. Same happens to girls, but in the bedroom.. Fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Yes, even an elder statesman like me has a question...now, I realize we all have opinions and this is why the question. Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Maybe I was a prude in my hay day, but if I didn't find the woman to be physiclally attractive, I wouldn't even make the attempt. Good question but I would have to say for the average guy it's age dependent. When Iwas younger I would literally hump anything that stood still longer enough for me to get a running start. But as I got older my sex drive finally calmed down in my thirties where in most cases I would only get that thing going if it was hot. Truth is, CTM is exactly right, Booze cancels out everything. I banged a honeydew one time because I drunk so much and quite honestly it was a real nice melon. After the age of thrity, maybe after a divorce or areal bad breakup dudes needs change. They may completely break down and immediately marry the first honey they see and hopefully she still likes him after 3 years of marriage. Better keep your fingers crossed. If they stay single(recomeneded by Dr. Crushlove) after that , without a doubt they really only looked to tag woman they find attractive and worth the effort. Sex gets more expensive as we age. Just the way it is. Unless, which I will call the CTM principle, they get drunk they could bang a maniquene because they don;t move and are easy to catch. Trust me. So I will answer azz. My old lazy tired horny azz would only bang a woman I find hot. Of course being blessed to have found Ms Crusher, I crave for nothing except a new deep fryer before football starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 I banged a honeydew one time because I drunk so much and quite honestly it was a real nice melon. What makes this funny is that at first I thought 'honeydew' was just a nickname for female. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Yes, even an elder statesman like me has a question...now, I realize we all have opinions and this is why the question. Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Maybe I was a prude in my hay day, but if I didn't find the woman to be physiclally attractive, I wouldn't even make the attempt. Intercourse NSDQ? Who uses that word anymore? I believe it is a generational thing. Woman in your day had acceptable sexual norms. Sorry for dating you brother. Woman in my day had acceptable sexual norms and then there is a woman of today. As a teenager 25+ years ago finding a Playboy was a godsend. Today...what is Playboy other then some old fart in a Captain's Hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanDoug Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Well, the addition of too much alcohol or other stuff might cloud the attraction, but that's just an excuse. So yeah, it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 What makes this funny is that at first I thought 'honeydew' was just a nickname for female. Uhh, hmmm, well, Yeah it was, you know, for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war ensemble Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Intercourse NSDQ? Who uses that word anymore? I believe it is a generational thing. Woman in your day had acceptable sexual norms. Sorry for dating you brother. Woman in my day had acceptable sexual norms and then there is a woman of today. As a teenager 25+ years ago finding a Playboy was a godsend. Today...what is Playboy other then some old fart in a Captain's Hat. What you seem to consider acceptable seems rather relative if people today find a radically different accepted value. And how are sexual norms unacceptable nowadays? Pornography and birth control are widely available, is that considered bad? The only perceptible difference between this generation and your previous ones are the proliferation of sex in common media, but I don't see any reason to believe people are more sexual as a whole. And, even if they were, I don't understand how that could be considered objectively unacceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 What makes this funny is that at first I thought 'honeydew' was just a nickname for female. I thought he meant a carnivorous plant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uart Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 I'll go ahead and be weird (apparently) and say no. Rule #1: No Uggos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted April 17, 2010 Author Share Posted April 17, 2010 What you seem to consider acceptable seems rather relative if people today find a radically different accepted value. And how are sexual norms unacceptable nowadays? Pornography and birth control are widely available, is that considered bad? The only perceptible difference between this generation and your previous ones are the proliferation of sex in common media, but I don't see any reason to believe people are more sexual as a whole. And, even if they were, I don't understand how that could be considered objectively unacceptable. You have to remember that PFSIKH will jump at the first chance he can get to let me know how old I am...LOL... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 You have to remember that PFSIKH will jump at the first chance he can get to let me know how old I am...LOL... You are one of the few I can pull the age card on. What you seem to consider acceptable seems rather relative if people today find a radically different accepted value. And how are sexual norms unacceptable nowadays? Pornography and birth control are widely available, is that considered bad? The only perceptible difference between this generation and your previous ones are the proliferation of sex in common media, but I don't see any reason to believe people are more sexual as a whole. And, even if they were, I don't understand how that could be considered objectively unacceptable. That is what I said. While there is no doubt Porn has become more acceptable, I would hardly put it on the same level as birth control. Again, I did not say there was anythig wrong or right about the difference in generations. Just saying the social norms have shifted do to the proliferation of sex in everyday media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war ensemble Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 You are one of the few I can pull the age card on. That is what I said. While there is no doubt Porn has become more acceptable, I would hardly put it on the same level as birth control. Again, I did not say there was anythig wrong or right about the difference in generations. Just saying the social norms have shifted do to the proliferation of sex in everyday media. Woman in my day had acceptable sexual norms and then there is a woman of today. To me that sentence implied that the "woman of today" does not have acceptable sexual norms. I guess I misunderstood your point, but I'll leave the caveat that it was poorly worded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 What makes this funny is that at first I thought 'honeydew' was just a nickname for female. The beauty of that is if it came from any other poster on the board it probably would have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Maybe I was a prude in my hay day, but if I didn't find the woman to be physiclally attractive, I wouldn't even make the attempt. I don't even understand the question. Would it be physically possible? Probably. But why would I want to have sex with someone I wasn't attracted to? I think I'd prefer masturbation. No awkward goodbyes in that scenario. I am, however, 100% in favor of friends w/benefits type arrangements. But in that case, I'm at least attracted to the girl as a human being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Women can be like Chinese food, my man: sometimes it looks disgusting on the plate, it may even smell nasty, but once you get a taste of it--BAM--it's the best food you've ever tasted. And then you bang it and give her a fake name and tip 15%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Women can be like Chinese food, my man: sometimes it looks disgusting on the plate, it may even smell nasty, but once you get a taste of it--BAM--it's the best food you've ever tasted. And then you bang it and give her a fake name and tip 15%. You left out the part about being hungry again in half an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan. Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Yes, even an elder statesman like me has a question...now, I realize we all have opinions and this is why the question. Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Maybe I was a prude in my hay day, but if I didn't find the woman to be physiclally attractive, I wouldn't even make the attempt. Sounds miserable. Maybe if I hated myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Wow...I think of all the sex I have missed through the years...it would be interesting to see if women felt the same way. I'm with you. There has to be SOME kind of attraction for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 You left out the part about being hungry again in half an hour. That reminded me : The GF and I ate at a German/ Japanese restaurant a few weeks ago. The food was great but an hour later we were hungry for power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted April 18, 2010 Author Share Posted April 18, 2010 I don't even understand the question. Would it be physically possible? Probably. But why would I want to have sex with someone I wasn't attracted to? I think I'd prefer masturbation. No awkward goodbyes in that scenario. I am, however, 100% in favor of friends w/benefits type arrangements. But in that case, I'm at least attracted to the girl as a human being. Exactly my sediments! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barmacral Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Exactly my sediments! You ought to run yourself through a better filtration system then. No more sediments to worry about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted April 18, 2010 Author Share Posted April 18, 2010 You ought to run yourself through a better filtration system then. No more sediments to worry about. LOl..sentiments...sorry about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greeneyedlady Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I am starting to feel sorry for Stevie Wonder. I hope he doesn't have any practical joker friends. Would one of them set him up with an ugly lady and tell him she's hot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted April 19, 2010 Author Share Posted April 19, 2010 I am starting to feel sorry for Stevie Wonder. I hope he doesn't have any practical joker friends. Would one of them set him up with an ugly lady and tell him she's hot? Yeah, but Stevie Wonder has a handicap...what about the person who has no problem with vision and has sex with someone unattractive and can't give you a good reason why they had sex other then it just happened...this person can't be too particular I would think? Either that or they're lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 19, 2010 Share Posted April 19, 2010 Nailing not-good chicks is like watching Reese Witherspoon movies, it's fun until your friends catch you doing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gringo Loco Posted April 19, 2010 Share Posted April 19, 2010 Nailing not-good chicks is like watching Reese Witherspoon movies, it's fun until your friends catch you doing it. Freeway is a great movie though, Witherspoon is a bad*ss in that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 19, 2010 Share Posted April 19, 2010 Nailing not-good chicks is like watching Reese Witherspoon movies, it's fun until your friends catch you doing it. Hence when I was a lad I only made friends with blind dudes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggs Posted April 19, 2010 Share Posted April 19, 2010 Yes, even an elder statesman like me has a question...now, I realize we all have opinions and this is why the question. Could you have sex (no, not the Bill Clinton variety...we're talking intercourse baby) with someone just for the sake of having sex or would there have to be an attraction there? Maybe I was a prude in my hay day, but if I didn't find the woman to be physiclally attractive, I wouldn't even make the attempt. Sexual attraction tends to increase/decrease based on my overall level of horneyness. Attraction generally tends to be pretty stable. The answer is yes sometimes and no sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.