Jump to content

Breaking: Revis sitting out OTA's because of contract


rick34125

Recommended Posts

Maybe Rex shouldn't have been setting Revis up like this by constantly calling him the best in the game and telling him he's going to be paid like the best in the game. Of course he's going to go straight to Aso's contract as the benchmark because that is the highest CB atm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Revis is a great player but he represents a huge problem for the players. You can't have a unified labor union when the highest profile players don't really care about their team the game or their team mates.

The players allready get a large share of the revenue and in the current environment we may well have decreasing revenue rather than increasing revenue as the real threat of deflation plays out. You can't have a cap a revenue share and a 53 man roster in a world of shrinking income and have a handful of players demand a huge portion of the players revenue without off loading players and lossing continuity. A team game that losses continuity losses it's fan base and it's ability to build and sustain a quality product.

The owners are going to have to break the Union and figure another way to deal with this growing problem. Darrell Revis can't be paid like the CEO of Goldman Sachs if that means David Harris either gets cut or is paid like a line worker at GM.

Very well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revis is a great player but he represents a huge problem for the players. You can't have a unified labor union when the highest profile players don't really care about their team the game or their team mates.

The players allready get a large share of the revenue and in the current environment we may well have decreasing revenue rather than increasing revenue as the real threat of deflation plays out. You can't have a cap a revenue share and a 53 man roster in a world of shrinking income and have a handful of players demand a huge portion of the players revenue without off loading players and lossing continuity. A team game that losses continuity losses it's fan base and it's ability to build and sustain a quality product.

The owners are going to have to break the Union and figure another way to deal with this growing problem. Darrell Revis can't be paid like the CEO of Goldman Sachs if that means David Harris either gets cut or is paid like a line worker at GM.

Excellent post!

I wonder if Revis would rather play for a dog like Oakland, over a contender like the Jets if it meant he made a few more million, when he would be making ridiculous millions anyway.

Makes little sense to me, let's see be rich and have a shot at a ring, or be rich and play on a garbage team.

This should really be a no brainer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most individual player salaries are never really about the TEAM. They are about the individual. The NFL is a business. Everyone wants to get rich,players,owners,agents you name it. Lets hope Tanne can keep everyone happy and rich at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can people call him selfish when we don't know what he's been offered? It is entirely possible that what the Jets' offered truly is a lowball offer. Without the facts, people really shouldn't be jumping to any conclusions.

Not even minimum salary in the NFL is lowball......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revis is a great player but he represents a huge problem for the players. You can't have a unified labor union when the highest profile players don't really care about their team the game or their team mates.

The players allready get a large share of the revenue and in the current environment we may well have decreasing revenue rather than increasing revenue as the real threat of deflation plays out. You can't have a cap a revenue share and a 53 man roster in a world of shrinking income and have a handful of players demand a huge portion of the players revenue without off loading players and lossing continuity. A team game that losses continuity losses it's fan base and it's ability to build and sustain a quality product.

The owners are going to have to break the Union and figure another way to deal with this growing problem. Darrell Revis can't be paid like the CEO of Goldman Sachs if that means David Harris either gets cut or is paid like a line worker at GM.

Repped!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:Typotux:

Revis' holdout Hard Knocks-induced?

Posted by Evan Silva on June 4, 2010 1:22 PM ET

In an in-depth examination of Jets cornerback Darrelle Revis' sudden boycotting of voluntary offseason workouts, ESPN's Rich Cimini brings up an interesting dynamic to the situation.

Revis' holdout began on Thursday, the same day HBO's Hard Knocks began filming at the Jets' practice facility. (Camera crews were set up on Wednesday.)

"Thursday's boycott was orchestrated," writes Cimini. "That Revis skipped Thursday was no coincidence."

Cimini doesn't go into much detail as to what this means, but we've got a few theories.

1. The timed commencement of Revis' holdout indicates that his intent is to continue his holdout into training camp. Hard Knocks doesn't air until August 11.

2. Revis' agent is using HBO to make his client's desire for a new contract as public as possible. The Jets don't exactly have a great reputation for extending their young players' contracts. All-Pro center Nick Mangold is also in search of a lucrative pay day, and is deserving. The Jets' failure to appease their disgruntled youngsters might make the organization look bad in front of a massive audience, spurring G.M. Mike Tannenbaum into action.

3. A conspiracy theory: HBO is working with Revis to pump up its ratings. Hard Knocks always needs a good story. Revis is the game's premier cover cornerback, and possibly the best young defender in the league. His displeasure with the Jets' front office is intriguing.

Still, as Cimini cautions, Revis' holdout is not overly concerning at this point. The sides have two months to hammer out an agreement, and the workouts Revis is currently skipping are voluntary.

Jay Glazer of FOX Sports predicts that the Jets and Revis will eventually agree to "a huuuuge deal."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent post!

I wonder if Revis would rather play for a dog like Oakland, over a contender like the Jets if it meant he made a few more million, when he would be making ridiculous millions anyway.

Makes little sense to me, let's see be rich and have a shot at a ring, or be rich and play on a garbage team.

This should really be a no brainer.

he's only making ONE million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey DLJ are you heading over to that club in the city that Susan sarandon owns tonight? A Lot of the Jets are going to be there according to Erik Ainge's Tweets from this morning

O rly? I'm headed bowling in Soho tonight. If I can get some info then why the hell not! Won't pass up a chance to meet some of my favorite men in the world!

P.S. What's Erik Ainge's Twitter?

Edit: Nvm got it. Spin NYC, interesting, I might check it out if the price isnt through the damn roof!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently Keller isn't going to be there. Something about him being paranoid about crazy internet people at a Jets' message board ;)

LMFAO!

I dont think Keller would mind a multi racial crew of attractive lipstick lesbians storming him! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A twist in the Revis negotiations

June, 4, 2010 Jun 49:31AM ET

By Rich Cimini

There's an interesting side note to the Darrelle Revis situation, as mentioned by Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk and The Sporting News. According to Florio, who writes that he has a copy of Revis' contract, there's language in the deal that states the star cornerback would arguably jeopardize $20 million in guarantees if he skips a mandatory minicamp or holds out from training camp. He wouldn't lose the money, just the guarantee.

Quick background: When Revis' original contract voids after the 2010 season, the Jets can buy back the 2011 and 2012 seasons for $5 million and $15 million, respectively -- and that money is guaranteed. It's all part of the complicated contract he signed as a rookie in 2007, a contract that took an acrimonious, three-week holdout to produce.

If Florio's assertion is accurate, Revis would lose a considerable amount of leverage. Yes, he could still skip the upcoming minicamp (June 14-16) and/or not show up for training camp, but that $20 million wouldn't be guaranteed anymore. Obviously, a player of his caliber wouldn't have to worry about getting cut, but there's always the possibility of a career-ending injury. Would he be willing to take that chance? He'd have to think twice (or three times) before staging a training-camp holdout, which also would result in a $16,000-per-day fine.

More fodder for the discussion. I'll have more later on Revis.

hmm weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to hate on Revis because of this. It is what it is.

There's nothing wrong with being a great player and a greedy bastard at the same time

Revis is just being smart.

Hes one of the best at his position, but not even among the top 10 money wise. The time is now to do a new deal that will put signing bonus in his pocket today.

The Jets will pay him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...