Jetsfan1015 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Just heard on 1050 ESPN radio that according to league sources, Ferguson has signed an extention with the Jets!!! http://www.newyorkjets.com/blog/posts/1672-report-ferguson-jets-agree-on-extension Report: Ferguson, Jets Agree on Extension Published: Wed, July 7, 2010 - 1:07pm ET By Randy Lange Lange is editor-in-chief of newyorkjets.com. He covered the Jets for 13 years for a North Jersey daily newspaper. File Under: Nick Mangold, D'Brickashaw Ferguson, Pro Bowl, Alan Faneca, contract extension change font email article 07/07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Rod Boone tweeted it as well... Excited, but wonder why this deal came now when Mangold/Revis were probably more vocal about wanting a deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Manish Mehta is reporting it on Twitter. Breaking: jets have come to an agreement on contract extension with d'brickashaw ferguson, according to league source. #nfl #nyj Boone as well: We interrupt the LeBronathon (and vacation) for big news. League source says D'Brickashaw Ferguson has agreed to a contract extension. #Jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Straw Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 This news is false -- it has to be. Didn't Bitonti tell Woody Johnson that he's broke and can't resign his own players?! How did Woody not get this news?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LWC611 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Excited, but wonder why this deal came now when Mangold/Revis were probably more vocal about wanting a deal Maybe because he kept his mouth shut and decided the negotiations were handeled best in the office and not the newspapers.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Maybe because he kept his mouth shut and decided the negotiations were handeled best in the office and not the newspapers.... I doubt the Jets are stupid enough to hurt themselves/mangold/revis by holding a grudge... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Maybe because he kept his mouth shut and decided the negotiations were handeled best in the office and not the newspapers.... Ding Ding Ding we have a winner Bob tell him what he won................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 This news is false -- it has to be. Didn't Bitonti tell Woody Johnson that he's broke and can't resign his own players?! How did Woody not get this news?!?! yep, Bitonti is always right.. ask him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 they are going to do it in order of tenure, so to speak. In this case draft order. Next will be Mangold, then Revis, then Harris. Then we can all shut the **** up over this non-football related story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 yep, Bitonti is always right.. ask him! This is going to be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LWC611 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 I doubt the Jets are stupid enough to hurt themselves/mangold/revis by holding a grudge... I am not sure how you reach that conclusion based on my post....I agree with you, but I am not sure how you got there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Rod Boone tweeted it as well... Excited, but wonder why this deal came now when Mangold/Revis were probably more vocal about wanting a deal Impossible to say, but maybe that's exactly why. Maybe the front office is sending a message that you get rewarded for being a good soldier. It's also possible that D'Brick was the most ready to be 'team friendly' in his efforts for a new deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 This is going to be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 This is going to be fun. I'm the same way, I'll admit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Impossible to say, but maybe that's exactly why. Maybe the front office is sending a message that you get rewarded for being a good soldier. It's also possible that D'Brick was the most ready to be 'team friendly' in his efforts for a new deal. It's either this or the Jets are doing this based on tenure due to the unique situation they are in and don't want to appear to be playing favorites. This way, they can turn to Revis if he gets mouthy and say, "D'Brick's been here longer and had less years left on his contract. Nick's been here the next longest, then you, then David." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 It's either this or the Jets are doing this based on tenure due to the unique situation they are in and don't want to appear to be playing favorites. This way, they can turn to Revis if he gets mouthy and say, "D'Brick's been here longer and had less years left on his contract. Nick's been here the next longest, then you, then David." Could be a lot of things. Either way, we secured a major piece today, and that's a good thing. People can debate D'Brick's greatness all they want, but the fact is, he's at worst, good enough that you don't need to worry about your QB getting destroyed, nor who your LT is going to be for the next few years. I think Mangold will get done fairly easily, and Revis will be the big ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBacker Prime Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Great news!! 3 to go and hopefully the other 3 payed attention to how to handle negotiations like a pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 It's either this or the Jets are doing this based on tenure due to the unique situation they are in and don't want to appear to be playing favorites. This way, they can turn to Revis if he gets mouthy and say, "D'Brick's been here longer and had less years left on his contract. Nick's been here the next longest, then you, then David." I sure hope they aren't playing the seniority game. You make exceptions for players like Revis. Now if he's being ridiculous with his demands, that's a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 this is great news. DBrick is a long island native and a Jet through and through. it's possible they decided Brick was the easiest to negotiate with, and maybe the hardest to replace. Not to say they could "replace" Revis or the others but they could "get by" with another CB. But it takes a high draft pick to replace DBRICK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangreenman Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 this is great news. DBrick is a long island native and a Jet through and through. it's possible they decided Brick was the easiest to negotiate with, and maybe the hardest to replace. Not to say they could "replace" Revis or the others but they could "get by" with another CB. But it takes a high draft pick to replace DBRICK. Exactly. My guess is if there's a franchise tag next offseason, we're going to use it on David Harris. We'll probably re-sign Mangold before TC ends... As for Revis, if he keeps being stubborn with his demands, we could table the talks for a year or two until he starts to be more reasonable. Right now Tanny should make signing Wilson and Vlad his top priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 I sure hope they aren't playing the seniority game. You make exceptions for players like Revis. Now if he's being ridiculous with his demands, that's a different story. Revis already is being ridiculous w/ his demands. 16M a year for a player w/ 3 years left on his deal is ridiculous. If he wants a new deal at this point, he has to at least be reasonable, as the Jets own him for 4 years (assuming there is a franchise tag in the forthcoming CBA). Fact is, Jets hold the stronger hand here, and if Revis wants more money, he can't ask for stupid money based on Al Davis's incompetence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Sirius NFL Radio is reporting that the deal breaks down this way: 6 year - 60 million dollar extension 34.8 million in guaranteed money He had 2 years left on his original deal so this becomes an 8 year, 73.6 million dollar contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Exactly. My guess is if there's a franchise tag next offseason, we're going to use it on David Harris. We'll probably re-sign Mangold before TC ends... As for Revis, if he keeps being stubborn with his demands, we could table the talks for a year or two until he starts to be more reasonable. Right now Tanny should make signing Wilson and Vlad his top priority. Vlad is all but done as of a week ago. I don't see Wilson being difficult. I think Mangold and Revis will be done before camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Revis already is being ridiculous w/ his demands. 16M a year for a player w/ 3 years left on his deal is ridiculous. If he wants a new deal at this point, he has to at least be reasonable, as the Jets own him for 4 years (assuming there is a franchise tag in the forthcoming CBA). Fact is, Jets hold the stronger hand here, and if Revis wants more money, he can't ask for stupid money based on Al Davis's incompetence. We don't know his demands. We only know what the media is saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Could be a lot of things. Either way, we secured a major piece today, and that's a good thing. People can debate D'Brick's greatness all they want, but the fact is, he's at worst, good enough that you don't need to worry about your QB getting destroyed, nor who your LT is going to be for the next few years. I think Mangold will get done fairly easily, and Revis will be the big ? Or, they just came to an agreement with him first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Sirius NFL Radio is reporting that the deal breaks down this way: 6 year - 60 million dollar extension 34.8 million in guaranteed money He had 2 years left on his original deal so this becomes an 8 year, 73.6 million dollar contract Nah, no way. bit says Woody will never spend money again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Sirius NFL Radio is reporting that the deal breaks down this way: 6 year - 60 million dollar extension 34.8 million in guaranteed money He had 2 years left on his original deal so this becomes an 8 year, 73.6 million dollar contract I'd just like to add that that's better than my job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 We don't know his demands. We only know what the media is saying. I'm fairly certain that Revis has been quoted as saying he wants $1 more than Asomugha, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 I'm fairly certain that Revis has been quoted as saying he wants $1 more than Asomugha, no? I think he was joking. He's also been quoted as saying that he didn't need to be the highest paid CB in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 We don't know his demands. We only know what the media is saying. We DO know his demands ... from Revis' own mouth. Revis told Cimini and others that he wants "Aso money", that Aso is making $16.2 million this year and he'd be happy with 50 cents more than that. It's hard for the media to make something up when the guy is saying it himself. Revis' demands are unrealistic. Aso got 3 yrs $45 million ($15 mil av). Revis wants that average for every year of the deal (6 yrs) which is actually more than Aso money. Once Revis gets to his senses then a deal becomes viable. Until then, it won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Certainly not the first guy I expected to hear this about, but this is certainly good news. Should also help with any of this nonsense about the team not being willing to pay anyone. Hopefully it also tells Revis and whoever else that as long as they are willing to be reasonable in their demands, the Jets will gladly work with them. I'm hoping this becomes a bit of a measuring point and they get Mangold locked up next. Revis I'm not too worried about, he'll get locked up eventually, I just think it's going to be a long negotiation process with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Certainly not the first guy I expected to hear this about, but this is certainly good news. Should also help with any of this nonsense about the team not being willing to pay anyone. Hopefully it also tells Revis and whoever else that as long as they are willing to be reasonable in their demands, the Jets will gladly work with them. I'm hoping this becomes a bit of a measuring point and they get Mangold locked up next. Revis I'm not too worried about, he'll get locked up eventually, I just think it's going to be a long negotiation process with him. Exactly on the bolded. This completely undercuts Revis' argument that the Jets don't pay their own players. They did pay, and a lot of money to boot. The Mangold situation is different, and I agree it should be done quickly. People confused Mangold's complaining with Revis' but they were complaining about 2 DIFFERENT things. Revis was complaining that the Jets offer was too low. Mangold was complaining that the Jets haven't even made him an offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Chris Broussard is reporting that Lebron wanted Brick to be a Jet if he was going to commit to the Knicks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 We DO know his demands ... from Revis' own mouth. Revis told Cimini and others that he wants "Aso money", that Aso is making $16.2 million this year and he'd be happy with 50 cents more than that. It's hard for the media to make something up when the guy is saying it himself. Revis' demands are unrealistic. Aso got 3 yrs $45 million ($15 mil av). Revis wants that average for every year of the deal (6 yrs) which is actually more than Aso money. Once Revis gets to his senses then a deal becomes viable. Until then, it won't. Is Revis willing to concede money already given on that current contract, to count towards that yearly average? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 It's also possible that D'Brick was the most ready to be 'team friendly' in his efforts for a new deal. I think it has very little to do with how much Revis or Mangold have talked to the press, and everything to do with the fact that Brick was willing to sign the most team friendly deal. Sirius NFL Radio is reporting that the deal breaks down this way: 6 year - 60 million dollar extension 34.8 million in guaranteed money He had 2 years left on his original deal so this becomes an 8 year, 73.6 million dollar contract This deal appears to be structured a lot like the one Revis supposedly turned down. It keeps Brick's current contract in place, with less than half of the total value guaranteed. Revis' primary issue, IIRC, was the guaranteed money. That's reasonable on his part. If the Jets buy his last two years back, that's $20M guaranteed before he ever signs an extension. I think they can get him done with a backloaded deal that gives him close to the salary average he's looking for, and guarantees better than 50% of the extension (on top of that $20M). Brick signed a pretty team friendly deal, which is understandable. Revis and Mangold are arguably the best at their positions. Brick is not a part of that conversation at LT. By being reasonable, he's now set for life. Good for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.