NFL Star -- I Didn't Emotionally Abuse That Stripper

[khesanh]

NFL Star -- I Didn't Emotionally Abuse That Stripper

8/4/2010 12:12 AM PDT by TMZ Staff

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Albert Haynesworth -- one of the highest paid defensive players in the NFL -- is fighting back in a $10 million legal war with a "stripper" ... claiming he never emotionally abused the woman after he learned she could be pregnant with his child.

As we previously reported, the woman had filed a lawsuit against the Washington Redskins star -- saying Albert refused to "emotionally and financially support" her after allegedly knocking her up during Super Bowl week in Miami back in February. She wants $10 mil for the "intentional infliction of emotional distress."

Now, Haynesworth and his lawyer Brett Kimmel are going on the offensive -- claiming the case should be dismissed because even though the woman may be upset at Haynesworth, she doesn't have a legal claim against him.

Haynesworth has previously stated that he would "absolutely" take care of the child -- IF she can prove that it's his ... which she has not yet been able to do.

More Albert Haynesworth

[Jetsfan80]

I actually believe him when he disputes that the baby is. I don't see how it would be possible to f*** that fat piece of sh*t.

[GodWearsAGrayHoodie]

baby may or may not be his. a simple test will determine the truth and if its his he needs to take responsibility.

as for $10 million in IIED. that is just straight up bullsh*t.

[villain_the_foe]

[Sperm Edwards]

Could someone please cite the statute she's suing under, that states a male citizen is legally required to "emotionally and financially support" a female citizen - to the extent any woman arbitrarily says she personally requires - if he gets her pregnant? More over, how he's somehow legally required to do so even in the absence of a definitive paternity test?

Haynesworth may be all kinds of an a-hole but eff this gold-digging crack whore.