Jump to content

Christopher Nolan


Jetsfan80

Recommended Posts

Between "Memento", "Batman Begins", "The Prestige", "Dark Knight" and his latest film, "Inception", Nolan is quickly becoming one of the best directors of our generation. Discuss.

no argument here. He saved the Batman franchise. and for that ill always hold him in high regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between "Memento", "Batman Begins", "The Prestige", "Dark Knight" and his latest film, "Inception", Nolan is quickly becoming one of the best directors of our generation. Discuss.

I never cared about who directs a movie. Nolan? Never heard of him. If he is becoming "best of" - great for him. Still dont care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never cared about who directs a movie. Nolan? Never heard of him. If he is becoming "best of" - great for him. Still dont care.

Once a director establishes himself, its my take that there's a certain level of expectation he has to live up to on each film. Nolan has nailed it at pretty much every turn.

By the same token, I refuse to watch any M. Night Shyamalan films since "The Happening". He's a POS director.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the same token, I refuse to watch any M. Night Shyamalan films since "The Happening". He's a POS director.

Haha! He was on the downswing long before The Happening. In fact, I thought his career took a pivotal turn with that movie. It's literally so bad that it's good. I get drawn in every time it's on, and I laugh my a$$ off. laugh.gif

You see he has some new flick coming out with Satan in an elevator or something? Saw the trailer before Inception (as a matter of fact). The audience is watching like this might be something interesting until M. Night Shyamalan's name comes across the screen... You could hear the collective groan. You know it's going to be bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha! He was on the downswing long before The Happening. In fact, I thought his career took a pivotal turn with that movie. It's literally so bad that it's good. I get drawn in every time it's on, and I laugh my a$$ off. laugh.gif

You see he has some new flick coming out with Satan in an elevator or something? Saw the trailer before Inception (as a matter of fact). The audience is watching like this might be something interesting until M. Night Shyamalan's name comes across the screen... You could hear the collective groan. You know it's going to be bad.

He's been terrible since unbreakable which wasnt great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I liked Unbreakable in an I really wanted to like this more kinda way. Everything since has been crap.

I feel that way about all his movies...Signs was right on the cusp until the whole water thing...Unbreakable was such a great idea...Lady in the Water was an idea with alot of potential but it flopped...maybe he'll do better as a producer...that Devil film isn't directed by him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nolan was given the role of reviving the Superman movies a couple months back. He won't be directing the first installment but is producing and it looks like his brother will direct. This is great news considering the colossal disappointment that Bryan Singer put on screen. Look for an edgier Superman and less of a "campy" feel.. awesome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nolan was given the role of reviving the Superman movies a couple months back. He won't be directing the first installment but is producing and it looks like his brother will direct. This is great news considering the colossal disappointment that Bryan Singer put on screen. Look for an edgier Superman and less of a "campy" feel.. awesome!

not awesome

you can't take a kid to super hero movies anymore, and that stinks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not awesome

you can't take a kid to super hero movies anymore, and that stinks

Dark Knight wasn't appropriate for children but Batman Begins was fine. That's a pretty good point though - I guess I'll have to see what it looks like before bringing the boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dark Knight wasn't appropriate for children but Batman Begins was fine. That's a pretty good point though - I guess I'll have to see what it looks like before bringing the boy.

it kills me. my 4 year old son runs around the house in his spiderman and batman halloween costumes, and I can't even let him watch you tube videos without being right there with him to make sure it's not a mash up with a nasty rap song

please let us keep superman alive !

I bet if a studio came out with a G rated superhero movie they'd make a killing cuz every parent would take their kids 4 times, just like the teenagers go 4 times to see the dark knight

it wouldn't have to be lame, just no plot lines where I would have to explain that batman has to choose between saving one ferry full of people or the other or joker will blow them up to prove a point :blink:

it's funny, my son doesn't even like the dark knight action figures because to him batman is adam west :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet if a studio came out with a G rated superhero movie they'd make a killing cuz every parent would take their kids 4 times, just like the teenagers go 4 times to see the dark knight

I think that's where movies like The Incredibles or Megamind come in. The studios are making a fortune on comic book movies because they're edgy and PG-13 or R rated. They don't want to soften those series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha! He was on the downswing long before The Happening. In fact, I thought his career took a pivotal turn with that movie. It's literally so bad that it's good. I get drawn in every time it's on, and I laugh my a$$ off. laugh.gif

You see he has some new flick coming out with Satan in an elevator or something? Saw the trailer before Inception (as a matter of fact). The audience is watching like this might be something interesting until M. Night Shyamalan's name comes across the screen... You could hear the collective groan. You know it's going to be bad.

I see Shyamalan a lot like I view Stephen King: prolific, excellent concepts, strong opener but a putrid, putrid closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way to be proactive in confirming your own ignorance.

LOL. +1

Nolan's movies are now definitely must see.

I disagree, Pac, about not being able to bring kids to superhero movies. It depends on the film. Dark Knight was a separate genre entirely. It was a crime thriller using DC characters. It's on a different plane of existence from Iron Man, Spider-man, Superman Returns, etc.

I took my 5 yr old to see Iron Man and he loved it because he tuned out to everything but when Iron Man was on screen. Kids do that well.

As to MNS, I liked signs and I could deal with the water thing because it was fresh water that killed the aliens. That might work considering natural fresh water is rare on Earth. I hated the whole "preacher loses his faith because his wife died" angle. HELLO? People die every day; is a preacher supposed to think that only happens to bad people? Good grief.

The rest of MNS's work since then is utter trash.

And, LOL, slats. Spot on about the trailer. MNS' name on the credits sucked the life out of the audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nolan's the new Michael Mann. His movies are appointment viewing, but that doesn't make him great.

I agree somewhat but I think Mann's a bit harsh. He hasn't dropped a Miami Vice just yet and he doesn't have that all style/no substance feel to his movies, especially TDK and Inception. I don't think he holds a candle to PT Anderson, Fincher, or the Coens. Also his brother really doesn't get enough credit for the work he's put out. I'd put him more on par with Hitchcock for the whole overuse of psychoanalysis consistently getting in the way of his premises thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took my 5 yr old to see Iron Man and he loved it because he tuned out to everything but when Iron Man was on screen. Kids do that well.

I can remember watching indiana jones as an adult and being surprised about how much stuff just went right over my head..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree somewhat but I think Mann's a bit harsh. He hasn't dropped a Miami Vice just yet and he doesn't have that all style/no substance feel to his movies, especially TDK and Inception. I don't think he holds a candle to PT Anderson, Fincher, or the Coens. Also his brother really doesn't get enough credit for the work he's put out. I'd put him more on par with Hitchcock for the whole overuse of psychoanalysis consistently getting in the way of his premises thing.

He's up there with anderson and fincher, assuming inception is as good as it's billed (haven't seen yet), i'm surprised you didn't mention kaufman.. my current favorite.. i know he's only been director 1 time, but it ceratianly feels as if he's the primary creative influence in all his films..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can remember watching indiana jones as an adult and being surprised about how much stuff just went right over my head..

Absolutely. As long as it's subtle enough, there are no worries, kids will never even realize what's going on. The movie like that for me was Ghostbusters. As a kid, that movie was huge and I watched it a million times. The first time I saw it as an adult, it was like it was a completely different movie. So many things I just never understood. That said, Dark Knight doesn't quite qualify, but I think others certainly do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once a director establishes himself, its my take that there's a certain level of expectation he has to live up to on each film. Nolan has nailed it at pretty much every turn.

By the same token, I refuse to watch any M. Night Shyamalan films since "The Happening". He's a POS director.

Lucky for most directors that most people are ignorant about what directors do what project or they would be broke and out of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's where movies like The Incredibles or Megamind come in. The studios are making a fortune on comic book movies because they're edgy and PG-13 or R rated. They don't want to soften those series.

I agree, but leave us superman, it already is a soft series, and doesn't need any edge. superman can just scoop up the bad guys and fly them off the jail, he doesn't need to drive a screwdriver through their heads or anything like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lucky for most directors that most people are ignorant about what directors do what project or they would be broke and out of work.

I disagree. I think you're the exception to the rule. Avid movie-goers know who directs films and discuss it with other movie-goers. If I'm going to spend $10 to go see a movie, I want to know if I'm getting a quality product beforehand to the best of my ability. I do my research.

If people want to be dumb in this economy and willingly go see crappy movies just for something to do, have at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree, Pac, about not being able to bring kids to superhero movies. It depends on the film. Dark Knight was a separate genre entirely. It was a crime thriller using DC characters. It's on a different plane of existence from Iron Man, Spider-man, Superman Returns, etc.

I never said all superhero films but Larz made a good point about Nolans movies specificially.

There's been a huge backlash against Singer for making a Superman devoid of any emotion. From the minute he started talking Brandon Routh was just doing a bad impersonation of Christopher Reeve.

With that in mind Warner Bros brought in Nolan to "kick start" the series. Since Supe Returns got blasted for being too campy I fully expect a much darker movie. Just think it might be a good idea to hear some feedback on the content instead of being there opening night with the 6 year old. Only because it's Nolans movie.

On the other hand I wouldn't hesitate to bring him to IM2, the Hulk, or the upcoming Thor, Cpt America, or Green Lantern (although I think Ryan Reynolds is a doosh).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree somewhat but I think Mann's a bit harsh. He hasn't dropped a Miami Vice just yet and he doesn't have that all style/no substance feel to his movies, especially TDK and Inception. I don't think he holds a candle to PT Anderson, Fincher, or the Coens. Also his brother really doesn't get enough credit for the work he's put out. I'd put him more on par with Hitchcock for the whole overuse of psychoanalysis consistently getting in the way of his premises thing.

Mann is actually my favorite director (to the degree that I even like the Mann movies everyone else thinks are terrible), so I actually disagree on the all-style-no-substance thing, especially since Nolan's stuff can be called all-cerebral-no-substance (his romantic subplots are DOA). I just think they've both made quite a few movies that are really good, but none that can be indisputably called "great."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...