Blackout Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=300814107 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 Where's the one of Big Papi? he's a Roid boy too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 When your boy Big Papoid found his groove, it was natural of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
80gonyjets51 Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 A-rod with the hammer! BANG! Down goes the KC Royals scousers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 When your boy Big Papoid found his groove, it was natural of course. Maybe, maybe not. If you want to believe, like Yankee Nation is apt to believe, PapRoid needed roids to become Big Papi. Did A-Roid? No. He could have become the G.O.A.T. with out being tainted, but $hit it all away for what? More money? Homeruns? 20, 30 years from now (assuming they remain clean), Pujols and Griffey will be revered. A-Roid? Not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 Where's the one of Big Papi? he's a Roid boy too. http://www.steveandthetank.com/Libraries/MetaBlogLib/WindowsLiveWriter-ExclusiveRoidSoxandBigPapiJuicerphotos_138-Roitiz_2.sflb.ashx Best I can do. And it will not even allow me to show it here. It is a Roitz t-shirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 Maybe, maybe not. If you want to believe, like Yankee Nation is apt to believe, PapRoid needed roids to become Big Papi. Did A-Roid? No. He could have become the G.O.A.T. with out being tainted, but $hit it all away for what? More money? Homeruns? 20, 30 years from now (assuming they remain clean), Pujols and Griffey will be revered. A-Roid? Not so much. I've said it a million times over...when you deal with multi million dollar contracts, the temptation to do PED's is so great, I don't know how one would not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted August 15, 2010 Author Share Posted August 15, 2010 I say put Bonds, A-rod, Mcgwire, Sosa, Manny and Clemens into the hall. These are clearly the best roiders. the other roid guys like Palmiero, Canseco, Sheffield, I-rod, Giambi, Big Papi etc. fall short compared to the players mentioned above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 I've said it a million times over...when you deal with multi million dollar contracts, the temptation to do PED's is so great, I don't know how one would not. I agree a 110%. IMHO Ortiz's rise in numbers is more attributed to his move from Minnesota to Boston then PEDs. He took PEDs to bank $69 million over the last 8 years from the Sox. Plus, who knows how much he has made in endorsements. Alex did not need them. He was naturally good. He was virtually guaranteed the HofF when he took them. He already had 70+ million in the bank when he took them. I have no problem with Big Papi or Giambi taken PEDs because in a similar situation I would likely do the same. The guys like Manny and Alex who do not need them is another matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.