stoicsentry Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Still don't understand. You have a receiver allegedly catching the ball, going down and being touched... the ball is removed from his hands by the defender before the defender hits the ground. How is that an interception?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 We got hosed. Apparently there is no such thing as down by contact anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Terrible calls but it didn't decide the game IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeWillie Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Still don't understand. You have a receiver allegedly catching the ball, going down and being touched... the ball is removed from his hands by the defender before the defender hits the ground. How is that an interception?????? Just two more examples of NFL rules defying average "common sense". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 think of it as a fumble feel better ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted October 31, 2010 Author Share Posted October 31, 2010 think of it as a fumble feel better ? Yeah but how do you fumble AFTER you are down and contacted??? that doesn't make any sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Terrible calls but it didn't decide the game IMO. how the crap can you say that? Both times it occurred when the Jets were in the middle of a drive. The 2nd one would've been 4th down anyways but the 1st one we could've had some points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Yeah but how do you fumble AFTER you are down and contacted??? that doesn't make any sense! I think I heard on the radio they explained it as a possesion thing, and that perriare guy said it was the right call maybe the ball was coming loose or whatever bottom line is hold onto the ball the packers literally took this game from the jets they wanted it more, played with more passion energy and intensity and that is what has been really bothering me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 I think I heard on the radio they explained it as a possesion thing, and that perriare guy said it was the right call maybe the ball was coming loose or whatever bottom line is hold onto the ball the packers literally took this game from the jets they wanted it more, played with more passion energy and intensity and that is what has been really bothering me Jets were flat on offense. defense looked good though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Jets were flat on offense. defense looked good though. good point, giving up 9 pts is very very good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 how the crap can you say that? Both times it occurred when the Jets were in the middle of a drive. The 2nd one would've been 4th down anyways but the 1st one we could've had some points. I agree with rillo, they were horrible calls, but it still doesn't help that our offense completely sucked and we turned the ball over too many times in green bay territory. Just sloppy offense today, really sloppy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 good point, giving up 9 pts is very very good also considering we turned it over deep in our own territory on the fake, this d is legit. just wish the offense wasn't so jekyll and hyde. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 also considering we turned it over deep in our own territory on the fake, this d is legit. just wish the offense wasn't so jekyll and hyde. 3 points on the fake punt. 3 points after missing on 4th and long in our territory at the end of the game. The defense played well enough to win this game. The only thing they didn't do were force any turnovers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 3 points on the fake punt. 3 points after missing on 4th and long in our territory at the end of the game. The defense played well enough to win this game. The only thing they didn't do were force any turnovers. I understand what your saying, but its hard to win any game when your offense puts up 0 points. We could have had the 85 bears D in there and we still wouldn't lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 I understand what your saying, but its hard to win any game when your offense puts up 0 points. We could have had the 85 bears D in there and we still wouldn't lost. In no way am I trying to make an excuse to that abortion of an offense we put out there today. It was frighteningly bad. We are not a pass first team, and yet we were today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 The offense was dog crap today, but those calls were both wrong, period. There is no debate in this at all, neither of those plays were anything close to interceptions. The officiating in the NFL this year is a joke. No human being in the world manages to retain their job when performing it as poorly as these morons do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 I thought the fans were going to storm the field on the second one... what a freakin joke those calls were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Oxoboxo Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 No politics. Fair enough... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 In no way am I trying to make an excuse to that abortion of an offense we put out there today. It was frighteningly bad. We are not a pass first team, and yet we were today. Agreed. Even if our D forced a turnover, I'm sure we wouldn't have gotten any points from it considering our game plan was involed pass, punt, and turnovers. This game could have been won so easily, I'm not that worried considering our two losses are only cause our offense was absolutely abysmal. If our O was at least competant, we could have won this against a terribly injured team, but alas, we couldn't capitalize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 i dont get these calls... but the WR could have held on better in each case. nick folk is just as much to blame as the offense... can't leave a gooseegg up there for 4 quarters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 i dont get these calls... but the WR could have held on better in each case. nick folk is just as much to blame as the offense... can't leave a gooseegg up there for 4 quarters. Did he turn the ball over in GB territory 3 times? This statement is almost as ignorant as complaining about Keller being horrible. You guys can't forget the offense as a whole, I would love to see the official stat of how many passes were dropped by the offense. This offense this week was embarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Did he turn the ball over in GB territory 3 times? This statement is almost as ignorant as kicker has 1 job and that's to kick. scoring points is contagious, if you never break the goose-egg it weighs on the offense... and everyone starts pressing for big plays cause they didn't hit the field goal. It's an awful, gut-wrenching play to miss that field goal. it seems minor but it's no way to win football games. if he hits it's 3-3 and who knows? instead they didn't score a point all game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoping4ASuperBowl Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 kicker has 1 job and that's to kick. scoring points is contagious, if you never break the goose-egg it weighs on the offense... and everyone starts pressing for big plays cause they didn't hit the field goal. It's an awful, gut-wrenching play to miss that field goal. it seems minor but it's no way to win football games. if he hits it's 3-3 and who knows? instead they didn't score a point all game. A FG would have been nice, but it still didn't matter considering our offense either kept punting or turning the ball over to take away giving folk anymore chances. The kicking game could have gotten better, if only Folk had more chances, he might have had a better day. It's not like the D didn't try and get the ball back for the offense to try and get any points on numerous occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimfire Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 supposedly the ruling on the field is that those 2 passes were intercepted. They cant overturn the call because the challenge was that the receiver was already down. Stupid catch 22 rule. even when ref clearly seen that the ball wasnt intercepted he isnt alllowed to change the call! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 lol Keller is such a douche. He gets up and points towards the ground lackadaisically. You can have all the talent in the world, if you don't play with fire and like you want it you'll always be inconsistent and you won't get to the top. Guys like Michael Jordan and Jerry Rice never took things easy, every single play, every practice session, it didn't matter what the situation was, these dudes acted like it was life or death. Keller, and the rest of the Jets O, wins a few games in a row and they think they can just coast. Dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Yeah it was all Folk's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midget Love 20 Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Tie goes to the offense (well, that's what I thought the rule was before today). My problem with the call if anything was Rex using his challenge on the INT with Cotchery. Essentially it was a non-factor whether or not he won the challenge or not, since the play occured on a 3rd and long. So what, we win the challenge for better field position? Take it for what is worth and have it in your back pocket for another potential bad call. Hindsight's a bitch sure, but poor use of challenges on the Smith fumble (clearly the ball was out) and the Cotchery one (really, no true argument or reward in winning) Either way when you team puts up 0 points you don't deserve to win period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmikeisback Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 We got ROYALLY screwed on both these calls. They were just awful. I've never seen that called like that before let alone twice in one game to screw us out of productive drives. Playing bad doesn't give the refs the right to screw us on those calls. The way these games are officiated is a complete travesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.