JetNation Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 On Thursday New York Jets offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer met with the media. Here is the transcript courtesy of the Jets. On if his wife yelled at him for not running the ball last week… “No, my wife did, but she was pretty good.” On if he’s serious that his wife yelled at him… “No. She doesn’t yell at me. She questions me a lot. She’s a tough one. She’s been around the game for a long time, so she’s got some strong opinions. She usually gives me a few minutes to compose myself, but then she’s not afraid to tell me her thoughts.” On his wife’s thoughts… “She just wanted to know what I thought (and) what went wrong. My father was there as well, so that was always good. He gives a whole different dimension to that. They get it. They’re always very supportive. They really are. They’re great. Hey, we didn’t play very well and I can’t remember this group having that many missed opportunities especially in the fourth quarter. Jerricho (Cotchery) is one of those guys (where) he makes those plays for us. Mark (Sanchez) makes those reads and has made those reads and throws for us. It’s just unfortunate, we feel like offensively we lost the game for us. We own that. It’s inexcusable. We need to play better.” On if he ran the ball enough against Green Bay… “Here’s what I think. You give the Packers credit. They did a good job against us running the football. The reason we kind of went with so many passes is we were moving the ball throwing it. They were doing a good job against the run. I think we had 27 carries for 3.2 yards per carry, not counting the fake punt and Mark’s (Sanchez) run late. We had some big plays and so I felt very comfortable with the way we were moving the football in the passing game. Yes, I was comfortable with the numbers.” On if he feels that he got away from the Ground-and-Pound mentality… “I’m the first to say when you look and there’s 38 attempts or whatever it was to be like, ‘Wow. That’s more than usual.’ Again, I don’t go into a game saying I have to run this many times. A lot of it is feel. I think a lot of it comes with winning and losing. I’m conservative against Baltimore. We lose. You lose against the Packers and you’re over-aggressive, so I don’t care about that stuff. I call plays that I think are going to help us move the football. I call plays that I think are going to help us score points. We had plenty of opportunities to score points, runs (and) passes. We need to execute better. There are certainly things that I could have called better and those are the things that, I think, this group in general, we all take ownership of. We had a great meeting on Monday. We watched the film all together. We don’t usually get through all the film together. There was a lot of guys sharing their thoughts about (the game, saying), “Hey. My bad. My mistake.” That was good to see.” On if the offense was embarrassed on Monday… “We were embarrassed. It’s embarrassing to get shutout. The Packers are a good football team, but I think it was 2006, the last time it happened. Again, you’re in a close game like that, the defense was playing lights out and we just didn’t make enough plays. It was one of those deals where we just couldn’t get the field position turned. We had the one drive early in the half, to start the second half. Brad (Smith) had the big return and on third down Santonio (Holmes) drops the ball running across the field. He was probably going to score. It seemed like we were backed up the whole game. We moved the ball. I think we had over 350 yards of offense, but it’s our job to score points and we didn’t do that, so that loss falls on us.” On Jerricho Cotchery dropping passes against Green Bay… “It breaks your heart for all of us because you know how much he cares and how hard he works. He’s just one of those guys, if I had to throw a ball to anybody with the game on the line, I’d never bat an eye to throw it to him. He’s a pro and he accepts it. He’ll bounce back this week.” On Cotchery talking to the media after the game… “That doesn’t surprise me. He’s the best. He’s got a passion about this game. He’s got a passion about his preparation. He’s got a passion about the way he plays. He’s one of the guys I enjoy coaching more than anybody I’ve ever coached. He’s up there in the top four or five for sure, so that doesn’t surprise me.” On if he sees an opportunity to run more against Detroit’s defense… “It’s funny because (the way) they play, the box is going to be loaded. You’re not going to have to find the safety because he’ll be in the box. The way they play and the way they get up field, there are seams that are created. They’re an interesting group because I think they’re giving up 6.1 yards a carry on first down, but they’re also sixth in the league in causing tackles-for-loss, so there are good plays and bad plays. You’ll hit a run on them and then they’ll hit you for a loss because of the way they play. This team is aggressive off the ball. They play with those wide ends, that are tilted in. The three technique, the two guys inside, (Ndamukong) Suh and (Kevin) Williams, are good players. But, yes, there are things that we feel like we can continue to find a way to run the football. People have gotten some big plays because when you load that many people in the box, if the ball gets through the front seven or front eight, there is nobody left. That’s one thing that does come up. You might be hitting your head into a brick wall for a couple of plays and then one ball will pop to the edge or you’ll pop through and you’ll have a big chunk. Again, I think it’ll be a good test for us, but something that we look forward to.” On if Detroit’s defense opens the door for the screen game… “Yes, I think so. I think they’ve got 23 sacks. They do a great job getting after the passer, plus you watch them playing at home, they’re even more explosive because of the crowd noise. We had two screens last week that could have been really good. Shonn (Greene) dropped the one on the first drive and then Mark (Sanchez) missed LT (LaDainian Tomlinson) on another one, but yes, we always have some screens up. Again, anytime you have a good pass-rush team, you leave yourself open to screens and quarterback scrambles.” On if the return of Santonio Holmes has caused Dustin Keller’s production to decrease… “Denver is probably the easiest to speak to. What they did was they actually lost (Brian) Dawkins, their safety. They actually played a third corner as a safety. They played all that man-to-man and so they felt like they had a better matchup. I think teams are accounting for him, but I know by no means does Santonio (Holmes) coming back have anything to do with it. Again, Dustin is a guy that we have plenty of things for. We’ve got to get those things dialed. He’s got to get open. Mark’s (Sanchez) got to make good reads. We’ve got to have guys hold up in protection. That’s kind of what happened last week. We had Santonio coming open in on a big in-route and we gave up a sack. Mark missed Braylon (Edwards) for a touchdown. We had a drop (by) Santonio. It was like one thing after another. That’s the thing that was so frustrating and that’s why this week we’ve talked about really two things, being detailed and being disciplined. Cover the finer points of the details and do it the right way and be disciplined about it. Today was one of our better practices we’ve had all year.” On if it creates more pressure on the offense because Detroit averages 38 points at home… “Knowing the way our defense plays, I think 38 points could happen (smiling), but we feel like we have a pretty good defense. If you look at last week, they kept us in the game against another explosive offense. That group’s as good as anybody at throwing the football and doing the things that they do. We don’t worry about the defense, specifically this week. We’re going to worry about us. We talked about that. The focus this week needs to be on the Jets offense. That’s our biggest opponent. Last week, we truly beat ourselves. Not to take anything away from the Packers, but we hurt ourselves. We talked about (how) our opponent this week is really the Jets.” On Ndamukong Suh… “(He has) powerful, explosive get off. He’s got unbelievable lower body strength. (He’s) worthy of the pick. (He has) great instincts. If you try to block back on him, he will swim around and cross-face you. The team has taken on Jim Schwartz’s mentality. It’s very similar to the Titans team that we play it seems every year. Bringing in (Kyle) Vanden Bosch, you know that defense is really following Kyle’s lead. They play like their hair’s on fire. It’s a lot of fun to watch. We’ll match that tempo.” On if it’s tougher for him to try and get everybody involved in the game… “No, it really doesn’t. I can see where you think it would. What it does is it makes it to where you really have to package your personnel groupings. That’s the hardest part about it. We want Santonio (Holmes) on the field. We want Braylon (Edwards) on the field . We want Dustin (Keller) on the field. We want Shonn (Greene) on the field. We have a lot of personnel groupings where we’re trying to feature different people. That’s the hardest part of game day-orchestration. Anthony Lynn, Kellen Clemens and a couple of guys are involved with that, substituting. We have so many moving parts going in-and-out. That’s the hardest part about it. I feel no pressure, nor does Mark (Sanchez), I believe, to get Braylon 15 balls a game. We want to win, and if it’s going to take 35 carries by Shonn Greene or 50 carries as an offense or 50 passes by Mark, if that’s what it’s going to take to win, that’s what we want to do. It’s a luxury that most teams don’t have. Braylon needs a blow. Ok, who are you putting in? Are you putting in Brad Smith? Are you putting in Jerricho Cotchery (or) Santonio Holmes? Oh, you’re going big with Dustin Keller? It’s a luxury that most teams don’t have, so we’re excited about it. It’s not a problem.” On if he would run it more against Green Bay if he had to do it again… “I don’t think so. You look at how we moved the ball in the game, (a) big pass to Jerricho (Cotchery), big pass to Santonio (Holmes). They did a good job on the running (game). A couple of the Brad Smith things, maybe, I probably would’ve featured a couple of those. That’s one of those things that you guard against as a play-caller. You call the one, and he fumbles the ball on the boundary. To be honest with you, you get that in your mind, (thinking), ‘Oh, man.’ I trust Brad. I trust Brad with my kids, but in your mind, you kind of go away from that and that’s what you fight. The staff’s great. They give me a bunch of feedback, (saying) ‘Hey, don’t get away from this. Don’t get away from that.’ To be honest with you, no, I’m comfortable with the way I called the game. There’s one play that I wish I would’ve handled differently, that jumps off at me. That’s the third-and-one in the two-minute drill. I thought LT (LaDainian Tomlinson) was out of bounds, and they wound the clock. I called a pass because I was kind of like, ‘Oh, they’re winding the clock.’ I would’ve probably called a run, for sure. It was third-and-one. There was like a minute-and-a-half left, you go and you get the first-down. You get a brand new set of (downs). I would’ve loved to have that one differently. I just didn’t handle the adjustment. I thought he was out of bounds. I expected him to be out of bounds and he wasn’t. I screwed that up.” On if Sanchez ran a quarterback sneak to avoid a possible challenge by Green Bay… “That’s the information that we got from upstairs. They thought it was close. Obviously, we watched it and it really wasn’t. It was such a big play at the time you didn’t want to take a chance. We were trying to hurry up to make sure that they didn’t challenge it.” On if it would have been better to throw short on third-down and go for it on fourth down, rather than throw it deep to Jerricho Cotchery late in the game… “I liked the call, and believe me, you guys know me, I don’t make all the right calls. Believe me, I screw a lot of them up. We were supposed to have LT getting out. He was the underneath check-down in that situation. He kind of got caught up in protection and never got out, so there was nothing for Mark. When you kind of saw him, he started inside to Dustin (Keller), who was his first progression. He just missed Braylon (Edwards). He had Braylon, he just missed him. His natural response, we think, was that if LT had gotten out, he probably would’ve checked it down. Some progressions, your built-in or conservative call, can be a check-down or a shallow cross or something like that. Unfortunately, it just didn’t work out for us.” On if the adversity Sanchez is facing now will serve as a true test of his growth… “I think so, and he realizes it. We have a fine system for his body language and things that he’s doing, which is great. (Mark) Brunell brought that. He’s growing up. He’ll handle this. I have no questions about this. This is a tough game. It’s a tough league. We’re 5-2. We didn’t play very well. He’s thrown four interceptions in the last two games, but come on. Those two interceptions (against Green Bay), they go on his record book and that’s fine, but those were good decisions, good throws. Our guys had them. They have to hold on to those balls for him. He’s been great this week. He’s been into it, ready to go, and again, he plays really well when he’s getting questioned, in my opinion, or when his back is against the wall.” On the fine system for Sanchez… “It’s for his body language. We have fun with it. Today, there was a play in practice where he screwed something up and he kind of looked like it was somebody else’s fault. That’s a fine. We fined him.” On how much the fine is… “I don’t know if I can tell you because it’s probably a salary cap infraction (joking). It’s just fun stuff, where if we see his body language getting the best of him. He’s a passionate guy that loves to play and so we just stay on him about that.” On his tendency to show his feelings through his body language… “Believe me, I know that better than most people. He and I spend quite a bit of time together, but it’s a fun way for us to stay on him about, ‘Hey, look. You’re the leader. Stay composed. Handle your business, good, bad (or) indifferent. It’s a four-quarter game. You never know.’ As bad as we played in that game, we had a chance to win the game down to the end.” On how often they fine him… “We just put it in. Actually, he (Sanchez) was the one that wanted to put it in. You’ll have to ask him about it. He’ll probably be mad at me for telling you guys, but who cares? (joking)” On if the fines are more for games or practice “No, it’s practice. He got dinged a couple of times today.” On how much money he would’ve lost last season with his body language… “Oh, he’d be broke. As much money as he has, he would be broke for the body language he had last year (joking).” On what the fines go towards… “I don’t know. Maybe he’ll take us all out to dinner or something. I don’t know. We haven’t gotten that far. It’s just something that, honestly, came up last week. I probably wouldn’t have even thought to say it, except (that) we fined him twice today.” On if Mark Brunell is keeping the money… “I probably trust him the most (joking).” On how much would a fine for eating a hot dog during a game cost… “That would be bad. That would be really bad. Don’t tell Brunell that. He probably doesn’t even know he ate a hot dog. He would probably be mortified to know that’s what was going on.” On if he has thought about Steve Weatherford at running back… “Absolutely. Did you see the speed on that thing? Actually, I wish he would’ve gotten an extra half-a-yard.” View the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jNYC1 Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Not a Schotty apologist but the receivers cost us that game. 5-7 drops and two additional drops that were ruled ints. Not to mention Brad Smith's fumble... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 On if he ran the ball enough against Green Bay… “Here’s what I think. You give the Packers credit. They did a good job against us running the football. The reason we kind of went with so many passes is we were moving the ball throwing it. They were doing a good job against the run. I think we had 27 carries for 3.2 yards per carry, not counting the fake punt and Mark’s (Sanchez) run late. We had some big plays and so I felt very comfortable with the way we were moving the football in the passing game. Yes, I was comfortable with the numbers.” It's as if he knows. WHY DO YOU KNOW AND DO NOTHING SCHOTTENHEIMER!?!? ANSWER ME DAMN YOU!! I wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 My...my god...look at how he insults us and his players: I’m conservative against Baltimore. We lose. You lose against the Packers and you’re over-aggressive, so I don’t care about that stuff. We had two screens last week that could have been really good. Shonn (Greene) dropped the one on the first drive and then Mark (Sanchez) missed LT (LaDainian Tomlinson) on another one, but yes, we always have some screens up. Again, anytime you have a good pass-rush team, you leave yourself open to screens and quarterback scrambles.” Yeah just throw them under the bus as if those weren't your fault...shoulda ran Greene, not throw to Greene. Greene can't catch! This is fact! You do NOT allow him to catch the ball! Know your personnel! On if he'd call the game different with a redo: “I don’t think so. You look at how we moved the ball in the game, (a) big pass to Jerricho (Cotchery), big pass to Santonio (Holmes). Definitely a danger to both our QB and our offense. Major red flags in this article... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I have that Godzilla ACTION FIGURE somewhere. It was my favorite action figure. Anyway, did this interview not perturb you? He's so undermining...and they try to paint him as a family man! A family man! Ha! He's tearing this family apart, I say! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I have that Godzilla ACTION FIGURE somewhere. It was my favorite action figure. Anyway, did this interview not perturb you? He's so undermining...and they try to paint him as a family man! A family man! Ha! He's tearing this family apart, I say! Still? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Still? Yeah man it was my favorite childhood toy. Why would I throw it away? Instead it's in the basement or a closet or something...Actually, it might be on my dresser...No that's the impostor one someone else bought me...Sh*t...well I know I have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Yeah man it was my favorite childhood toy. Why would I throw it away? Instead it's in the basement or a closet or something...Actually, it might be on my dresser...No that's the impostor one someone else bought me...Sh*t...well I know I have it. I was not asking about the doll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I was not asking about the doll. Action figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The Schotty debate reminds me alot of the old Hern Edwards debates. Naysayers would be all, "Herm sucks" and Herm-lovers would be all "Three playoff appearances in five years" and Naysayers would be all "Look at this picture of a cat." History proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that Herm did, indeed, suck. Will it do the same for Schotty? [queue cat photo] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Action figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The Schotty debate reminds me alot of the old Hern Edwards debates. Naysayers would be all, "Herm sucks" and Herm-lovers would be all "Three playoff appearances in five years" and Naysayers would be all "Look at this picture of a cat." History proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that Herm did, indeed, suck. Will it do the same for Schotty? [queue cat photo] You got a problem with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The Schotty debate reminds me alot of the old Hern Edwards debates. Naysayers would be all, "Herm sucks" and Herm-lovers would be all "Three playoff appearances in five years" and Naysayers would be all "Look at this picture of a cat." History proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that Herm did, indeed, suck. Will it do the same for Schotty? [queue cat photo] Probably not since there's nothing similar about the two guys except that some people liked them and some people didn't like them. Also, I hated Herm Edwards. Any guy who has to hire someone to manage the time in their one hour to shine is a little iffy. Too busy coming up with crowd pleasing bullsh*t to spew out or sumpin, I guess. I ESPECIALLY hated him after his teams started losing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Probably not since there's nothing similar about the two guys except that some people liked them and some people didn't like them. The major similarity: Putting forth a general air of incompetence despite putting up concrete statistical evidence of relative success. I think Gruden has personally mocked both of them, too, giving them yet another similarity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Also, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 On Thursday New York Jets offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer met with the media. Here is the transcript courtesy of the Jets. On if his wife yelled at him for not running the ball last week… “No, my wife did, but she was pretty good.” On if he’s serious that his wife yelled at him… “No. She doesn’t yell at me. She questions me a lot. She’s a tough one. She’s been around the game for a long time, so she’s got some strong opinions. She usually gives me a few minutes to compose myself, but then she’s not afraid to tell me her thoughts.” On his wife’s thoughts… “She just wanted to know what I thought (and) what went wrong. My father was there as well, so that was always good. He gives a whole different dimension to that. They get it. They’re always very supportive. They really are. They’re great. Hey, we didn’t play very well and I can’t remember this group having that many missed opportunities especially in the fourth quarter. Jerricho (Cotchery) is one of those guys (where) he makes those plays for us. Mark (Sanchez) makes those reads and has made those reads and throws for us. It’s just unfortunate, we feel like offensively we lost the game for us. We own that. It’s inexcusable. We need to play better.” So, Mrs. Shotty is the Jets OC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 So, Mrs. Shotty is the Jets OC? That's the Jets' in-house reporter. If he opens the interview with the obvious "How the **** do you get shut out by a defense that's been shredded in recent weeks?" question, he'd be pilloried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The major similarity: Putting forth a general air of incompetence despite putting up concrete statistical evidence of relative success. I think Gruden has personally mocked both of them, too, giving them yet another similarity. Air of incompetence? Is this from Schotty's body language? I don't think Gruden's insulted anyone currently holding a coaching job in the NFL. I'm pretty sure he's in love with everything dealing with anything in the NFL. So, Mrs. Shotty is the Jets OC? BEHIND EVERY GREAT MAN THERE IS AT LEAST ONE GREAT WOMAN!! That way when the bus shows up she can nudge him and take (at least) half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Well, now we know why they ran the QB sneak, which is what most of us assumed. It was a bad game, the plays were there, clearly what everyone says about him is false. He calls based on the feel of the game. Maybe thats the flaw. Maybe he should be more committed to running against poor run teams and not change the game plan up based on what the D is giving him? Maybe that would make people more happy with his play calling. IDK. But I agree, they were moving the ball passing it and if you take away 2 bogus INT's, a Brad Smith fumble and tons of drops - the Jets probably win this game. I'm going to put this one on the players. I'm not a huge Schotty fan, but the plays were there last week and the players didnt make them. We adjusted at half time, had a great drive and had a terrible penalty that kept us from scoring. I'm sorry to all the haters, Sunday's performance was on the players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I'm sorry to all the haters, Sunday's performance was on the players. As one of the "haters", I hope to God you're right about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 As one of the "haters", I hope to God you're right about that. As one of the non-haters, I hope to Jah that one day the haters realize how obvious it is that it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 As one of the non-haters, I hope to Jah that one day the haters realize how obvious it is that it was. Right at the momenr a coach in any sport gets fired, there will appear a quote from one of his players saying "[Coach X] can't go out and make tackles/jumpshots/plays. He can't hit/catch/shoot the ball for us. It's our fault he got fired." But I agree. Sunday was on the players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Right at the momenr a coach in any sport gets fired, there will appear a quote from one of his players saying "[Coach X] can't go out and make tackles/jumpshots/plays. He can't hit/catch/shoot the ball for us. It's our fault he got fired." And on the day Schottenheimer gets fired, Gato will use that quote to vindicate everything he's said about him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 And on the day Schottenheimer gets fired, Gato will use that quote to vindicate everything he's said about him. No, Gato will be there to console Schotty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 And on the day Schottenheimer gets fired, Gato will use that quote to vindicate everything he's said about him. GOD DAMMIT!!!!! Max, can we give JetsFan80 the power to edit my posts for me? This is unconscionable!!! Note: I actually love Gato's work on the Schotty matter. Dude hangs in and makes damn good arguments, even if they're focused on a cause I don't agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 And on the day Schottenheimer gets fired, Gato will use that quote to vindicate everything he's said about him. Meh...I'll let his career do that for him. He's going to last in this league, just as he's lasted here through 4+ years, 4 QBs, 2 HCs, and 2 very challenging trips to the playoffs (with one more possibly on the way). Guy's a good coach. Just accept it...the Jets seem to have done so. PS: Thanks Tom. That sentiment is very appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jussssstme Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The Schotty debate reminds me alot of the old Hern Edwards debates. Naysayers would be all, "Herm sucks" and Herm-lovers would be all "Three playoff appearances in five years" and Naysayers would be all "Look at this picture of a cat." History proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that Herm did, indeed, suck. Will it do the same for Schotty? [queue cat photo] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Dude hangs in and makes damn good arguments, even if they're focused on a cause I don't agree with. You know who also did that? Benito Mussolini. Just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 With all due respect to everyone some topics are so lopsided its not even worth discussing. If i have to discuss whether Schotty is a competent OC i would then have to discuss the possibility that babies are delivered by storks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 You know who also did that? Benito Mussolini. Just sayin'. Like most things if you tried just a liiiiiiiittle bit harder that might have been funny. The effort was obvious, but the result was not. With all due respect to everyone some topics are so lopsided its not even worth discussing. If this was true about this particular subject I wouldn't do what I do. Believe me, next win you will hear how groundbreaking the playcalling was and that at least 90% of the victory can be credited to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Needs more cat pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Like most things if you tried just a liiiiiiiittle bit harder that might have been funny. The effort was obvious, but the result was not. Humor has never been my strong suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Believe me, next win you will hear how groundbreaking the playcalling was and that at least 90% of the victory can be credited to that. But you saying it doesn't count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 But you saying it doesn't count No, it does, just not as much as it's perceived value is here. Value is relative, and...well Braylon Edwards kinda put it best on QBs and offense: "When you get that respect level, when you get that, where it just becomes natural, second-nature (then you can criticize)," Edwards said today after practice. It takes experience, it takes consistency and when these things happen then, then you can do that, then people respect when you do that. But until the consistency is in there, you gotta get yourself rollin' first." With veteran QBs Schottenheimer has won games and put up points (anyone who thinks our '06 offense was even a middle of the pack offense going into the season see my sig). Neither one has ever complained about the playcalling. And lets face it...Mark Sanchez hasn't won any of these 5 games for the Jets. They were the result of the offensive guys coordinating themselves into play cohesive enough to produce a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.