Jump to content

SenorGato

Members
  • Posts

    27,723
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

SenorGato last won the day on October 8 2013

SenorGato had the most liked content!

Reputation

13,960 Ready For Flight

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Jets Info

  • Where you alive for Super Bowl III?
    Even if I was...where?

Recent Profile Visitors

49,095 profile views
  1. Well the first sentence is just an incredibly stupid stance that doesn't make any sense. It's an open forum, throw up a paywall or password protect the thread or something if you want to close a thread to the public. You didn't give away picks on purpose because you feel some type of way about the team you're drafting for. Apples to oranges. We *all* get that this is bullsh*t, no one is saying otherwise, but we've done these forever without anybody actively sh*tting on the whole thing because they have the GMz powerz.
  2. Fair enough, but hopefully because they're looking to milk more free picks from this....guy.
  3. An actual response to the draft value chart (twice), which objectively showed what a bullsh*t trade that was and done on purpose at that (an actual troll act), was that it's stupid and he has the GM powerz. Like wtf....How is that anything but an unreasonable person choosing to be an a$$hole? This is the first poster I've seen in the decade+ of these mocks - treat it like it's some bullsh*t (we leave it unsaid)...As far as I see it, it was rude and disrepectful to everyone involved and done vindictively because this baby troll feels some type of way about the team he's drafting for. Special offseason
  4. No problem. So I'm clear - we now require permissions to post in certain threads or is it just this one time thing because *that's* the best defense for that troll? He can still keep talking his troll nonsense because he filed the proper message board paperwork?
  5. Yes, because that is what actually happened. You trolled the whole mock and still are trying your darndest to convince yourself otherwise.
  6. Rotfl *still* trying ------ I like that Landry pick for the Ravens. There's another LB prospect I think is slipping through the cracks right now.
  7. I don't exactly have high expectations for McGM but no one who is actually a GM would be so dumb as to just give away a third round pick. More hilarious - gives away the pick and deludes himself into thinking he actually upgraded the pick.
  8. Oh and: https://twitter.com/realcubsinsider/status/969743002875801601?s=20
  9. I'm liking that the Cubs went with a bat first, switch hitting backup catcher in Caratini. He's been on my radar as a while, hard for me to resist a bat first switch hitter who happens to handle a premium position well enough while being either young or age appropriate for his level. He doesn't have starter upside, at least not first division starter upside, but the profile alone should keep him employed in the league for a long time. This roster is pretty gd loaded but I'm still thinking there's big a trade to consolidate within the next year. I'm still huge on trading for Stroman and Osuna from the Jays or Archer and Colome from the Rays. Picking up their respective CFs in the same deal wouldn't hurt but not interested without the pitching. Stroman or Archer, I personally prefer Stroman by alot, would be superstars in Chicago, bigger than they already are...
  10. Rotfl this guy is STILL trying to justify that nonsense Jets trade
  11. Oh, the 49ers got a coup with Ward. That's pick pairs extremely well with Jimmy G should he prove to be anything close to the QB they hope he is.
  12. Are you working on convincing me of your nonsense or yourself?
  13. Are you going to keep ignoring the actual trade for what you think you did?
×
×
  • Create New...