PFSIKH Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 What the heck are you talking about Blackout? Tom Brady had a running game for two seasons, the rest of the time his running game has been poor at best and only looked to be average at times because Brady keeps the defense back. How is it Tom's fault that New England has, for the most part, fielded a better defense than Indianapolis? The Colts have had the better running game and until two years ago, the better receivers as well. Tom Brady is a much better Quarterback than Peyton Manning. 3 Super Bowl Championships > 1 And in Peyton's lone Championship season he was horrible, the defense and running game carried him to the Championship. He can never seem to get it done in the playoffs, minus one game in 2006 against New England. Other than that game, he has never gotten it done in the postseason. Manning has 3 MVP awards? Wow. So cool. Brady has 3 Championships. Which one means more? The Championships. Brady can get it done when it matters, Manning can't. Manning will beat him in life time statistics, sure, but he will not beat him in lifetime Championships. BTW, I highly doubt Manning will ever have as good as a season as Brady did in 2007. +1 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.