nico002 Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Lets get this straight, Revis' weakness has always been deep end speed. the one type of player you never line him up against are burner type guys. That play was on Goodwin, Revis can still be a top 5 corner if used intelligently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjunc Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 No he didn't, Ginn did what Green did last week. he was supposed to have safety help and the S blew it but everyone blames Revis. this one was all on revis last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbt Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 1 minute ago, nyjunc said: No he didn't, Ginn did what Green did last week. he was supposed to have safety help and the S blew it but everyone blames Revis. this one was all on revis last night. the safety play this year so far has been weak. that group needs to get it together along with the rest of the secondary. need better communication Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaJet Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Revis was trying to read the QB while Goodwin blew right by him, no way he has the speed to make that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 2 hours ago, nico002 said: Lets get this straight, Revis' weakness has always been deep end speed. the one type of player you never line him up against are burner type guys. That play was on Goodwin, Revis can still be a top 5 corner if used intelligently. Sure it's been his weakness. Name the Cb, the entire history of the NFL who never was beaten. How stupid can we get. Another numbnut was saying that Moss burned him. What once on that long TD? Out of all their match Ups? So friggen stupid at times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.