LionelRichie Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Wrong They have to spend 89% of the cap over a 4 year period. No qualifications for a single year According to the CBA's Article 12, Section 9: A) For each of the following four-League Year periods, 201 3-201 6 and 2017-2020, there shall be a guaranteed Minimum Team Cash Spending of 89% of theSalary Caps for such periods (e.g., if the Salary Caps for the 2013-1 6 and 2017-2020 are$100, 120, 1 30, and 1 50 million, respectively, each Club shall have a Minimum Team Cash Spending for that period of $445 million (89% of $500 million)). If I read this right, the NFL is making a distinction between salary cap and cash outlay. it may even itself out over the course of 4 years but it seems like teams that gave out big signing bonuses in 2012 would be at a disadvantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 If I read this right, the NFL is making a distinction between salary cap and cash outlay. it may even itself out over the course of 4 years but it seems like teams that gave out big signing bonuses in 2012 would be at a disadvantage. Bingo That's exactly what they are doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 hey if they dont want him id take him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.02d5a086ca7ed80fc66faf3bb6f878c7.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.