JotsFeed Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Thoughts on jets going after Nick Fairley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Pretty nice job promoting yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpstateJetsGuru Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 What Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Fairley blows donkey d1ck there you have it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 The New York Daily News reports the Jets are interested in free agent DT Nick Fairley. Beat writer Manish Mehta calls Fairley a "contingency plan" for a Jets defensive line that appears likely to lose free agent NT Damon Harrison, and could conceivably move on from RE Muhammad Wilkerson if GM Mike Maccagnan finds a trade partner. Fairley would be a rotational sub-rusher in the Jets' 3-4 defense. He has spent his entire NFL career playing in 4-3 schemes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadetree Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Not sold on him. I guess he's played well if he's being sought by teams, but, man, I can't get those man-breasts at his combine out of my head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 You could've just said "Jets Going After Nick". We're not the Patriots. We won't cheat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 33 minutes ago, Shadetree said: Not sold on him. I guess he's played well if he's being sought by teams, but, man, I can't get those man-breasts at his combine out of my head. Me neither low budget is all I can think of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.