Jump to content

Zander and Nyn's Ebolaids Mafia Game


Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Pac said:

Vote JiF

 

1 hour ago, Pac said:

A vote buried on you?  I just voted you like a couple hours ago lol.

 

58 minutes ago, Pac said:

I keep seeing the name visor..  which one of you spazz' is that?

 

57 minutes ago, Pac said:

gfy

 

48 minutes ago, Pac said:

Are you Visor?

 

48 minutes ago, Pac said:

Are you Visor?

Here is the effort from Pac today.

Smash or Him. Pick one. Lets string them up and celebrate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Calder said:

It is the best motive I see. But, better to be suspicious in a mafia game.

Your stance seems to be assuming the movement was townie based. Where is the evidence on that.

Well I was one of the people moving

but im not assuming nyn is a villager 

its just ridiculous to make a read in what happened under the assumption scum were the ones moving (or based on any assumption about the moving peoples alignments really but esp that one because people are at a baseline much more likely to be villas than wolves)

lol d1 associatives

i still see no reason why you assume it's scum movement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lissa said:

Well I was one of the people moving

but im not assuming nyn is a villager 

its just ridiculous to make a read in what happened under the assumption scum were the ones moving (or based on any assumption about the moving peoples alignments really but esp that one because people are at a baseline much more likely to be villas than wolves)

lol d1 associatives

i still see no reason why you assume it's scum movement

I believe that scum had the motivation to move far more than town at EOD. So I am very suspicious as a result. Why do you seem so opposed to reading the movement as scum driven?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, lissa said:

Well I was one of the people moving

but im not assuming nyn is a villager 

its just ridiculous to make a read in what happened under the assumption scum were the ones moving (or based on any assumption about the moving peoples alignments really but esp that one because people are at a baseline much more likely to be villas than wolves)

lol d1 associatives

i still see no reason why you assume it's scum movement

Will you explain in detail why you made that move?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, lissa said:

Not sure where I am even being particularly defensive of her really

Just confused about how not being lynched at eod after being tied means anything about anyone without wolf flips of involved people

Probably just has to do with being used to different eod culture

 

19 minutes ago, lissa said:

Oh you had a wolfread on her before I didn't realize/remember

Sorry I kinda completely blanked this game from my mind overNight

 

17 minutes ago, lissa said:

I am reading your posts. You said it was odd. You did not explain why it would be odd.

I also don't see how he was particularly uninvolved during the day anyway.

Regardless of how accurate it is that that was the case I don't find it odd, no. Why would it be?

 

16 minutes ago, lissa said:

But this assumes the people who moved are scum which doesn't have any basis?

 

14 minutes ago, lissa said:

Like if leelou flips wolf I can see the process but why would villagers not move there?

 

14 minutes ago, lissa said:

I don't really understand what this means re: momentum in nolders direction

This is a bunch of questions and oh jeez, I'm confused, I dont get it and I dont understands and why would, etc.

I dont see a read or a stance in these posts. 

Not a good look IMO.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JiF said:

 

 

 

 

 

This is a bunch of questions and oh jeez, I'm confused, I dont get it and I dont understands and why would, etc.

I dont see a read or a stance in these posts. 

Not a good look IMO.

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JiF said:

 

 

 

 

 

This is a bunch of questions and oh jeez, I'm confused, I dont get it and I dont understands and why would, etc.

I dont see a read or a stance in these posts. 

Not a good look IMO.

Is asking questions to solve things not a thing you do?

theres a clear stance throughout there that I disagree with nolders stuff about the switching 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lissa said:

Is asking questions to solve things not a thing you do?

theres a clear stance throughout there that I disagree with nolders stuff about the switching 

This is not helpful. You have not made clear why you moved your vote, and despite your feeling that it was for obvious reasons, it would still be great if you would just clear it up for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, D P R said:

Will you explain in detail why you made that move?

I already did and I think it was obvious in flow but I will repeat it. 

i thought nolder was responding very badly to my questioning and dodging around actually answering what I was trying to ask

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, D P R said:

This is not helpful. You have not made clear why you moved your vote, and despite your feeling that it was for obvious reasons, it would still be great if you would just clear it up for us.

Actually I already did make it clear this morning. 

And im not sure what that has to do with the post you quoted here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lissa said:

I already did and I think it was obvious in flow but I will repeat it. 

i thought nolder was responding very badly to my questioning and dodging around actually answering what I was trying to ask

So, if I understand correctly, you were just playing as normal and the timing didn't have anything to do with your reasoning process. Is that correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lissa said:

I don't know where the snark is. Calder was making no sense. 

obv meant Calder above too apparently I can't do names today 

How am I making no sense?

I explained why scum would have to act there if one of Hallia or Dice is scum.

What is even weirder is that you continue to assume the movement of votes was townie based, when Hallia just survived a claimed vig shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Calder said:

How am I making no sense?

I explained why scum would have to act there if one of Hallia or Dice is scum.

What is even weirder is that you continue to assume the movement of votes was townie based, when Hallia just survived a claimed vig shot.

In reference to the above:

@ MOD - Will you please provide a list of ITA winners?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...