Bleedin Green Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 As far as I can tell, there's no way to compensate Revis substantially (and satisfactorily) without either giving him an insane (>$30m) signing bonus as part of an extension (not going to happen) or by ripping up his existing deal... the latter results in his cap number for next year will end up (at least) doubling, meaning that if Revis gets his way, you can say goodbye to either Harris or Mangold, or both. I just can't see how it would have made any sense for Tanny to approach Revis about ripping up the last 3 years of his deal, as is claimed, without a cap-friendly solution already worked out. If you heard Tanny talking today, it became explicitly clear that he has no interest in the concept of simply ripping up the remainder of Revis' deal. How many times did he need to repeat that Revis still had three years left on his deal? Clearly, he was making a point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.