TuscanyTile2 Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 Ngata, Wilfork, Jenkins....Vea. These dudes have tremendous impact on their D. That's Jordan Davis. It's not sexy, people will hate it but he's got HOF potential written all over him. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 It’s more that he became less effective every time he played more than 35% of snaps and was the 3rd best DT on his roster. Great upside and the snaps he plays will probably be super fun to watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCJet Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 27 minutes ago, kdels62 said: It’s more that he became less effective every time he played more than 35% of snaps and was the 3rd best DT on his roster. Great upside and the snaps he plays will probably be super fun to watch. This is the issue I have with taking him. Yes he is talented and possibly dominant but it will likely only be 25 or so snaps per game which is where his value diminishes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 2 hours ago, kdels62 said: It’s more that he became less effective every time he played more than 35% of snaps and was the 3rd best DT on his roster. Great upside and the snaps he plays will probably be super fun to watch. I think this is where some are going wrong in their evaluation of Davis. He’s a presence guy, the planet theory, the fact he is a freak just makes him even more special. Hence why I find the data around the overall impact of when he’s in the game vs out to be much more compelling then his individual stats. Factor in how Georgia used him, it’s kind of mind blowing what his presence does, especially for some who was off the field on most 3rd downs. I get that people are worried about what he’s like when he plays more but I feel like it’s over blown and it can also be applied to any UGA player yet half of that D is going to go top 100. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 Would be an awful awful pick for the jets with their scheme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted April 17, 2022 Share Posted April 17, 2022 46 minutes ago, JiFapono said: I think this is where some are going wrong in their evaluation of Davis. He’s a presence guy, the planet theory, the fact he is a freak just makes him even more special. Hence why I find the data around the overall impact of when he’s in the game vs out to be much more compelling then his individual stats. Factor in how Georgia used him, it’s kind of mind blowing what his presence does, especially for some who was off the field on most 3rd downs. I get that people are worried about what he’s like when he plays more but I feel like it’s over blown and it can also be applied to any UGA player yet half of that D is going to go top 100. We do need someone to help us get into more 3rd and long situations where he'd typically be off the field. I don't know if a first round pick is worth it but someone will take him in the first. I'd feel a lot better about it if we had 3 first round picks - which we can make happen if we want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.