NY JET 29 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Your voting should NOT be based on your oppinion. It should be based on what helps the NYJ the most. my questions to you guys. 1. Which mock helps the NYJ the most? 2. Which mock is more realistic? If Gholston gone. #6- Leodis Mckelvin, CB. #36- James Hardy, WR. Alt pick- Cliff Avril, DE. Round4A- Jonathan Goff, ILB. Round4B- Depending on round 2 either Eddie Royal, WR, or Kendall Langford, DE. If Gholston is available. #6- Vernon Gholston, LB. #36- Antoin Cason, CB. Alt pick- Brandon Flowers, CB. Round 4A- Jonathan Goff, ILB. Alt pick- Kendall Langford, DE. Round 4B- Eddie Royal, WR. Alt pick- Keenan Burton, WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 MOCKERY DRAFTS. My thoughts shouldn't be based on my opinion, that's classic. It's my OPINION and also IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE NYJ (in my opinion) not REACH with Gholston or McKelvin and get us some OFFENSIVE WEAPONS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick34125 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 take Mcfadden at #6 if he's available, especially since it's likely we can get impact defensvie players in the 2nd and 4th rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterNorth09 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 I'd be surprised if Gholston wasn't there at #6. Here's my mock: Round 1: Gholston, OLB Round 2: James Hardy, WR Round 4: Roy Shuening, G Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 If McFadden or Ryan are available we take one of them IMO. I'd definetly prefer Gholston over McKelvin though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NY JET 29 Posted March 30, 2008 Author Share Posted March 30, 2008 If McFadden or Ryan are available we take one of them IMO. I'd definetly prefer Gholston over McKelvin though. I agree with everything you said;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterNorth09 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 If McFadden or Ryan are available we take one of them IMO. I'd definetly prefer Gholston over McKelvin though. If we stay at 6 it's definitely between Ryan and Gholston. The talks with DMC are window dressing to get Dallas to trade up with us. I'd be shocked if the FO drafted DMC w/o the intent to trade down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Question. Do you think that since we're picking 6th, you have to post 6 posts about the draft a day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Booom Booom I beg you stop! Please STOP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetfan718 Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 I think Gholston will be available to us, so i think that mock will be better for us...i'd like for us to be able to get Eddie Royal and Kendall Langford...how come no Shawn Crable or Donnie Avery or even Antwaun Molden? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Question. Do you think that since we're picking 6th, you have to post 6 posts about the draft a day? Give him a break guys. It's the off-season FFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Booom Booom I beg you stop! Please STOP! This guy can't touch Boom Boom and his rollerblades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Give him a break guys. It's the off-season FFS. I say let him post.. I have no problem with it, but we do not need 2-3 threads every day that virtually say the same thing. That's all I'm saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.