afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Of course Simms thinks it was clean. He's a Steelers suck-up and wants to be Big Ben's buttercup. Steelers are a dirty team with big mouths. Steelers will be HUGE favorites going into the SB. My only hope is that Wisenhunt (who should know the Pitt schemes) outsmarts that slarmy looking Tomlin. Not Happenning..Warner 5 sacks 4 Ints 3 fumbles..what game does that remind u of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 what? english please. i have no idea what that first sentence was even supposed to say. as you stated, he launched himself, not allowed. have you watched football anytime recently? He will not be fined willis was not a defenseless WR, he was a like RB ready to run someone over. he led with his shoulder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 He will not be fined willis was not a defenseless WR, he was a like RB ready to run someone over. he led with his shoulder you don't need to be a devenseless wr. that has nothing to do with it. you can't tackle anyone leading with your head. its pretty simple. he probably won't be fined, but thats only because goodell is as inept as you and simms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 you don't need to be a devenseless wr. that has nothing to do with it. you can't tackle anyone leading with your head. its pretty simple. he probably won't be fined, but thats only because goodell is as inept as you and simms. OK Chiquita whatever you say... Do you drive a Limo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted January 19, 2009 Author Share Posted January 19, 2009 Joe- Ben just makes plays. Hope you think he's the truth now. No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 OK Chiquita whatever you say... Do you drive a Limo? ive never even been inside a limo. how does it feel to be whipped into living in vermont? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 ive never even been inside a limo. how does it feel to be whipped into living in vermont? I love it here! BTW Enculer une mouche Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 He will not be fined willis was not a defenseless WR, he was a like RB ready to run someone over. he led with his shoulder he caught the ball and took 2 steps... he wasnt running anyone over. he hadnt established himself when he was hit. Again, the NFL doesnt care what the intent was, it is what the result was. Look at the Eric Smith hit... the NFL didnt care what his intent was, he launched himself and hit Boldin helmet to helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 I love it here! BTW Enculer une mouche you enjoy being wrong, don't you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 he caught the ball and took 2 steps... he wasnt running anyone over. he hadnt established himself when he was hit. Again, the NFL doesnt care what the intent was, it is what the result was. Look at the Eric Smith hit... the NFL didnt care what his intent was, he launched himself and hit Boldin helmet to helmet. Boldin was a defenseless WR, Smith should not have been suspended. Fined yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 you enjoy being wrong, don't you. you can always put me on ignore...you have that option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Boldin was a defenseless WR, Smith should not have been suspended. Fined yes I agree. There should only be suspensions on hits that are vicious, intentional, and unnecessary. But the pansy NFL doesnt view it that way... According to the rules: helmet to helmet and should be assessed the same penalty as Smith. My feelings: big hit, borderline bad hit, but not deserving of a suspension. But I was never commissioner of a professional sports league so my feelings dont matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 you can always put me on ignore...you have that option i have no problem with you being wrong. why would i put you on ignore? i never understood how "go f a fly" is even a derogatory term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 I agree. There should only be suspensions on hits that are vicious, intentional, and unnecessary. But the pansy NFL doesnt view it that way... According to the rules: helmet to helmet and should be assessed the same penalty as Smith. My feelings: big hit, borderline bad hit, but not deserving of a suspension. But I was never commissioner of a professional sports league so my feelings dont matter. i agree as well. they should just get rid of helmets all together and this wouldn't even be a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 i agree as well. they should just get rid of helmets all together and this wouldn't even be a problem. what would hold Polamalu's hair in place? He would look like Sideshow Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 I agree. There should only be suspensions on hits that are vicious, intentional, and unnecessary. But the pansy NFL doesnt view it that way... According to the rules: helmet to helmet and should be assessed the same penalty as Smith. My feelings: big hit, borderline bad hit, but not deserving of a suspension. But I was never commissioner of a professional sports league so my feelings dont matter. Remember Clark took out Welker with a vicious hit..led with shoulder and decleated him, Welker was defenseless.. Willis was not. Now if willis has a broken neck, Goodell may fine him..suspend him no way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 for what its worth, (source: http://www.profootballtalk.com) MCGAHEE HAS CONCUSSION, WILL BE OK Posted by Mike Florio on January 18, 2009, 11:09 p.m. A league source tells us that Ravens running back Willis McGahee suffered a concussion on that wicked fourth-quarter hit from Steelers safety Ryan Clark. Per the source, McGahee is “OK.” It remains to be seen whether the league characterizes the hit from Clark as a violation of the rules. It wasn’t a classic helmet-to-helmet hit; McGahee seemed to drop his head as Clark was approaching, and Clark appears to try to lead with his shoulder. UPDATE: Actually, I just saw a different angle while watching the sequence of events on TiVo. It was a helmet-to-helmet hit and Clark should be suspended for the Super Bowl. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.