afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 I will never understand how players act that stupidly. Pitt did outplay them Holmes had a TD lost 4 points Sneed or sweed dropped a sure TD Ben mismanaged a FG at 1H Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 That's not leading with your helmet intentionally? Clark should be suspended for the SB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 ouch Hit of year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Pitt did outplay them Holmes had a TD lost 4 points Sneed or sweed dropped a sure TD Ben mismanaged a FG at 1H Hey, Pittsburgh is just better. That FG at the end of the first half never should have happened in the first place. They kept the ball after the phantom roughing the passer penalty. It was the best thing that they didn't get the kick off. Sweed's a baby. He messed up so he faked being injured & they took time off the clock for him acting self-absorbed like a dickhead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 That's not leading with your helmet intentionally? Clark should be suspended for the SB. he was trying to lead with the shoulder, but he was trying to make a big hit... dont know why guys would put themselves in that position... but then again I never played professional football so i wouldnt understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Hey, Pittsburgh is just better. That FG at the end of the first half never should have happened in the first place. They kept the ball after the phantom roughing the passer penalty. It was the best thing that they didn't get the kick off. Sweed's a baby. He messed up so he faked being injured & they took time off the clock for him acting self-absorbed like a dickhead. yes the refs sucked that holmes non td /Incomplete call still has me stumped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Hit of year Much more f'ed up than Eric Smith on Boldin. At least Smith only clocked him like that because someone else knocked Boldin's head forward. This was one-on-one. Let's see if Goodell thinks this is less-warranted of a game suspension than Eric Smith's hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Sweed's a baby. He messed up so he faked being injured & they took time off the clock for him acting self-absorbed like a dickhead. bruised ego's are very painful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Much more f'ed up than Eric Smith on Boldin. At least Smith only clocked him like that because someone else knocked Boldin's head forward. This was one-on-one. Let's see if Goodell thinks this is less-warranted of a game suspension than Eric Smith's hit. Goodell wont like the fact he left his feet to make the big hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Much more f'ed up than Eric Smith on Boldin. At least Smith only clocked him like that because someone else knocked Boldin's head forward. This was one-on-one. Let's see if Goodell thinks this is less-warranted of a game suspension than Eric Smith's hit. clean hit.. led with shoulder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Much more f'ed up than Eric Smith on Boldin. At least Smith only clocked him like that because someone else knocked Boldin's head forward. This was one-on-one. Let's see if Goodell thinks this is less-warranted of a game suspension than Eric Smith's hit. Goodell will not suspend him for the Superbowl. it will cause a sh!t storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudicus Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 That looked exceptionally hard, that was a hockey hit right there. Full on body check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 That's not leading with your helmet intentionally? Clark should be suspended for the SB. agreed. simms has no idea what the hell he is talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 yes the refs sucked that holmes non td /Incomplete call still has me stumped because that is the rule. that was a great call. exactly what should have happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Goodell wont like the fact he left his feet to make the big hit. you are allowed to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Goodell will not suspend him for the Superbowl. it will cause a sh!t storm. that just shows what an idiot goodell is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Goodell will not suspend him for the Superbowl. it will cause a sh!t storm. Hey, I don't think Smith should have been suspended either. But you have to call it the same for everyone. You can't say, "Well it's the superbowl in 2 weeks, so you're allowed to tee off on someone running at full speed using your helmet as a battering ram and putting a guy in the hospital." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 you are allowed to not if you lead with your head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 not if you lead with your head. led with shoulder watch your tivo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 led with shoulder watch your tivo just because he put his shoulder down, doesn't mean he led with his shoulder. he put his head down, facemask to the ground. if you have watched the league this year, that is not only a penalty but a fineable offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 just because he put his shoulder down, doesn't mean he led with his shoulder. Simms also said it was clean... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Simms also said it was clean... wow, so you agree with an idiot. you should get an award. he also stated that you can never call a play "leading with the head" if someone is tackling someone else. what kind of idiot even mentions such a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyHector Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Simms also said it was clean... Well, in that case, it must have been clean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Well, in that case, it must have been clean. Heh at least he has played I felt it was a clean hit, vicious but clean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 just because he put his shoulder down, doesn't mean he led with his shoulder. he put his head down, facemask to the ground. if you have watched the league this year, that is not only a penalty but a fineable offense. Exactly. As we have learned this year, its not what your intent was, its what the result was. Sadly it was helmet to helmet with the defender launching himself into the receiver. That should be a suspension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Of course Simms thinks it was clean. He's a Steelers suck-up and wants to be Big Ben's buttercup. Steelers are a dirty team with big mouths. Steelers will be HUGE favorites going into the SB. My only hope is that Wisenhunt (who should know the Pitt schemes) outsmarts that slarmy looking Tomlin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Simms also said it was clean... Simms licks Steelers balls all game... so why would he see it differently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted January 19, 2009 Author Share Posted January 19, 2009 The Ravens' winning (Great defense and the occasional big play) were not enough today as somebody finally forced Flacco into mistakes. Congrats to the Steelers, but Go Cards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted January 19, 2009 Author Share Posted January 19, 2009 The Ravens & Steelers are both dirty teams, hits like that are going to happen, especially when they hate each other, which both teams do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Congrats to the Steelers and Steely McBeam and his cum stained friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Heh at least he has played I felt it was a clean hit, vicious but clean. yeah, like 20 years ago. the game is called much different these days, its not even comparable. the guy has no idea what he is talking about. it was not clean in the slightest, you felt wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Exactly. As we have learned this year, its not what your intent was, its what the result was. Sadly it was helmet to helmet with the defender launching himself into the receiver. That should be a suspension. what at that point Mcgahee was like a RB not a defenseless WR this is football, he launched with shoulder and will not be fined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 Joe- Ben just makes plays. Hope you think he's the truth now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 what at that point Mcgahee was like a RB not a defenseless WR this is football, he launched with shoulder and will not be fined. whether he launched with his shoulder or not, it was helmet to helmet first. Its not the intent, its the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnjet Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 what at that point Mcgahee was like a RB not a defenseless WR this is football, he launched with shoulder and will not be fined. what? english please. i have no idea what that first sentence was even supposed to say. as you stated, he launched himself, not allowed. have you watched football anytime recently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.