NFL might tweak offensive holding, false start

[Smizzy]

NFL might tweak offensive holding, false start

Updated: March 22, 2006, 8:45 PM ET

rulesAssociated Press

NEW YORK -- The NFL is satisfied with its officiating but concerned that high-profile errors in the playoffs and Super Bowl left a bad impression.

So beginning next week at league meetings in Orlando, Fla., it will tweak a few rules, dealing mostly with player safety, offensive holding and false starts.

"Because of the magnitude of the games, there's an indictment of the system," Atlanta general manager Rich McKay, co-chairman of the league's competition committee, said Wednesday during a conference call.

The main topic will be the first steps in choosing a successor to Paul Tagliabue. The commissioner will appoint a committee Monday to begin the process.

McKay, a leading candidate, dodged several questions on that subject. Instead, he spent most of his time discussing officiating, as did his committee during meetings the past month in Indianapolis and Naples, Fla.

In the 256 games during the past regular season, there were 850 false-start calls. To cut that number, the committee is ready to recommend that minor flinches by wide receivers be ignored if they have no effect on the play.

The committee also is considering recommending to officials that they make sure there was holding on a play before throwing a flag.

"We want to make sure they actually see the foul," McKay said.

One such play occurred in the Super Bowl. Seattle right tackle Sean Locklear was called for holding on a pass completion early in the fourth quarter that would have put the Seahawks at the Pittsburgh 1-yard line, poised to go in for the tying touchdown. After the penalty, Seattle quarterback Matt Hasselbeck threw an interception and the Steelers eventually scored to take a 14-point lead.

The committee also wants to change the rule on hits by defenders below the knee on quarterbacks. McKay said defensive players will be told they must make an effort to avoid hitting QBs in the legs to avoid serious injuries, like the hit on Cincinnati's Carson Palmer against the Steelers in the playoffs.

Another recommendation expands the rule put in place last year against "horse collar" tackles. That violation mandated flags only when a defensive player coming from behind got his hands inside the shoulder pads of a player with the ball. If it is expanded, it would extend that to tackles inside the shirt.

The committee also is considering an annual proposal from the Kansas City Chiefs to expand the playoffs from 12 to 14 teams. He said there was more interest in it this year, although he stopped short of saying the committee would recommend it.

In addition to McKay, the committee includes coach Jeff Fisher of Tennessee, the co-chairman; general managers Ozzie Newsome of Baltimore; Bill Polian of Indianapolis; and executives John Mara of the New York Giants and Mark Richardson of Carolina. Coach Marvin Lewis of Cincinnati is a nonvoting member.

I like the QB rule.

[serphnx]

I don't like the QB rule, because the officials are stupid and now basically every hit on a QB will be illegal. You're not allowed to take them high or low, what's left? I don't think defenders should be trying to injure players, but you need to let them play. I didn't think the hit on Palmer was dirty. This is football, injuries happen.

The problem isn't the rules. It's these ****ty referees. Ignoring the problem won't fix anything. You want better officiating? Make them full-time referees, give them a better salary so they don't take bribes, and give them off-season "schooling" on how to be a referee. Don't continuously change the system to fit personnel, change the personnel.

[PatsFanTX]

In the 256 games during the past regular season, there were 850 false-start calls. To cut that number, the committee is ready to recommend that minor flinches by wide receivers be ignored if they have no effect on the play.

This is BS.

All this will do is penalize well-disciplined teams and reward undisciplined teams.

If WR's can't remember the snap count, they should be penalized.

[spjets]

I like the QB rule.

yeah, but if a pass rusher gets knocked down and still trys to sack the QB he cant below the knees...

[spjets]

In the 256 games during the past regular season, there were 850 false-start calls. To cut that number, the committee is ready to recommend that minor flinches by wide receivers be ignored if they have no effect on the play.

This is BS.

All this will do is penalize well-disciplined teams and reward undisciplined teams.

If WR's can't remember the snap count, they should be penalized.

great point...

[SlugORama99]

The problem isn't the rules. It's these ****ty referees. Ignoring the problem won't fix anything. You want better officiating? Make them full-time referees, give them a better salary so they don't take bribes, and give them off-season "schooling" on how to be a referee. Don't continuously change the system to fit personnel, change the personnel.

Do you really think that NFL officials are taking bribes? I think that is a ridiculous statement. This isn't boxing!!!

[Scott Dierking]

"We want to make sure they actually see the foul," McKay said.

-Gee, you would think that would be a prerequisite already.

[CrazyCarl40]

I don't like these rule changes from what I can tell. If a WR cannot be held as accountable as everyone else, isn't that a little wrong? As far as protecting the QB even further, a la Palmer, I'd have to say that is absolute crap. Eventually you will only beable to rip the flag from the Quarterback's hip pocket and then he'll be down. It's a sad state of affairs when you can barely even tackle the QB anymore.