Matt39 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 If he had stayed healthy? Him. If Griffey had stayed healthy we wouldn't be talking about Barry Bonds and his HR chase as Griffey already would've had it by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon88 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 With Roids....Bonds Without Roids...Griffey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiLMiCKMANTLE Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 i think griffey is the all around better player with his speed and great defense.. but to hit like barry did late in his career with or with out roids is impressive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anskyruben Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Bonds was a far better player hands down. But we now know it was because of roids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Hard to say. I'd sure like to have seen what Griffey could have done without all those injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kidhuman Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Griffey>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bonds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anskyruben Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 Hard to say. I'd sure like to have seen what Griffey could have done without all those injuries. Same can be said about Mickey Mantle. That's a non issue. Part of being a great player is staying healthy. he could not. The guy is very brittle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 as much as I hate to say it Bonds* was a better player in the 1990s than Griffey was hitting wise Frank Thomas and Bonds are in a class of their own in the 90's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 The 'roided up Bonds was better than Griffey ever was. However, I'd take Griffey's prime by a nose over Bonds's real prime (in the '90s, before he started taking junk). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.