visajets Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Sanchez lines up in front of Weatherford. Chicago wasnt in the least bit faked out. BAD PLAY CALLING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Who cares if chicago bought it or not. Why the crap was it called at all. They were in their own territory, it was 4th and 3, and the jets were up by 7 at that point. That's a crap ton of risk and little upside. There is aggressive decision making and there is stupid decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visajets Posted December 27, 2010 Author Share Posted December 27, 2010 This has been going on all year. Bad decisions at all the wrong times. Sick and tired of it. Cant blame Sal Alosi for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan1015 Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Interesting enough, even though Chicago wasnt fooled, Sanchez put the ball right where it had to be. If Brad Smith doesnt drop a perfect pass, everybody would be calling it a great and gutsy call by the coaching staff. Personally I didnt have a problem with the aggressiveness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeWillie Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Interesting enough, even though Chicago wasnt fooled, Sanchez put the ball right where it had to be. If Brad Smith doesnt drop a perfect pass, everybody would be calling it a great and gutsy call by the coaching staff. Personally I didnt have a problem with the aggressiveness. No I wouldn't have. It was a stupid decision and I said it at the time. As someone else said, "high risk, low reward" up 7 points on your own 40. Even if you make it, you still have to go 60 yards for a TD. Couple that with the fact that your QB who is normally not on the punt team is out on the field. You don't think one of the 20 Bears coaches on the sideline or the half dozen up in the booth recognized that? The Bears reeled off 21 straight points immediately after that play. That decision changed the entire complexion of the game for the worse. Terrible, terrible decision and it still would have been terrible if Smith catches the pass for a first down. Just not the right play there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Interesting enough, even though Chicago wasnt fooled, Sanchez put the ball right where it had to be. If Brad Smith doesnt drop a perfect pass, everybody would be calling it a great and gutsy call by the coaching staff. Personally I didnt have a problem with the aggressiveness. Dude, please stop. that was a dumb play call on the road in your own end of the field with the lead. Im sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashmouth Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 These type of plays really can't be debated. They are heros if they work and idiots if they dont, so whats the point ? That being said i think they would have had a better chance to make that play work if Weatherford just took the ball and ran since he has speed having Sanchez in there was...Well I dont know what the **** to say about that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaulRedRolon Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Brian Shottenheimer needs to go, he is awful. bad play calling. predicatable offense. I dont know how this guy gets praised. he is downright awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashmouth Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Brian Shottenheimer needs to go, he is awful. bad play calling. predicatable offense. I dont know how this guy gets praised. he is downright awful. Thats all nice and stuff buts that not shottys call its rex or Westhoff who make the call on that play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.