Klecko73isGod Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 The cost vs. actual improvement ratio. You'll never see the return on a $12M #2 CB. So you're actually telling me that if the Jets sign Nnamdi and his addition leads to a significant enough improvement that the Jets win the SB it will not have been worth it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 So you're actually telling me that if the Jets sign Nnamdi and his addition leads to a significant enough improvement that the Jets win the SB it will not have been worth it? No, I'm actually telling you that I don't believe that will be the case. In fact, I'm concerned that spending that much money on a second CB at the expense of the offense can and will result in the entire team taking a step backwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 That's your argument for not wanted to improve our passing D as much as possible? That's my argument for not wanting to improve our passing D as much as possible at the expense of the rest of our team, namely our offense and QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 No, I'm actually telling you that I don't believe that will be the case. In fact, I'm concerned that spending that much money on a second CB at the expense of the offense can and will result in the entire team taking a step backwards. if Revis gets hurt or holds out he's not a #2 he's a #1. If they blitz revis he's a #1. It's overly simplistic to call Nnamdi the #2. It's like saying Cliff Lee is a #2 Starter and Cole Hamels is a #3 starter to Roy Halliday. These guys are all aces. It's adding another ace and creating a super unit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.