if you're world is right, the man will be right

[CanadienJetsFan]

Saleh just said this about Zach on the Kay show.

What the heck is he alluding to?

[The Crusher]

Maybe listen to the rest of it?

[Beerfish]

Only a Christopher Nolan movie can figure out Saleh.

[Charlie Brown]

Maybe Zach needs his off-the-field MILF days curtailed?????????

[CanadienJetsFan]

Any buddhists around who can decipher this saying?

[Barry McCockinner]

If one’s world is right, then the man will be right is a thought-provoking statement that merits deep reflection. On the surface, it implies that the world is created by individuals and that the individual should be held responsible for their own actions. However, upon closer examination, this statement raises several questions. What is meant by “right”? Is it referring to moral or ethical standards? Does this mean that the world is a reflection of the individual’s actions or beliefs?

In essence, this statement suggests that the world is a product of the individual, and that the individual is ultimately responsible for their actions. To be “right” is to adhere to a moral or ethical code. This code is determined by the individual and their beliefs, and the world is a reflection of that individual’s choices. Therefore, if an individual chooses to act in accordance with their moral code, the world will be “right”, and the individual will be “right”.

This idea can be further explored by looking at the implications of this statement. If an individual’s world is deemed “right”, then the individual is expected to act in a certain way. This could be interpreted as a form of moral obligation, where an individual is expected to live according to their own moral code in order to maintain the integrity of the world. This could be seen as a form of self-governance, where the individual is responsible for the quality of their world.

This statement also implies that if the individual is “right”, the world will be “right”. This suggests that the individual’s actions have a direct impact on the world. This could be interpreted as an acknowledgment of the individual’s power to shape the world. It is up to the individual to choose to act in a manner that is in line with their moral code, and in doing so, they can create a “right” world.

Overall, if one’s world is right, then the man will be right is a statement that is full of implications and philosophical meanings. It suggests that the individual is ultimately responsible for the quality of their world, and that their actions have the power to shape the world. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to choose to act in accordance with their moral code in order to create a “right” world.

[SomebodytoAnybody47]

I really do think Saleh is telling him he needs to grow up a bit. Questioning whether he wants to take this seriously or not.  Between this (whatever tf this is and that other press conf.) he's definitely sending some messages. 

[DireJet]

The wordsmith strikes again! Stairmaster has spouted more cliches than the offense has scored touchdowns over the last month!

Just say this year wasn’t nearly good enough — top to bottom — and the fans deserve A LOT better. Say you let the fans down, too. Then sign off. Why is this so hard!?!? 

[Barry McCockinner]

If one’s world is “right,” then it could be argued that the man will also be “right.” This statement raises important questions regarding the relationship between our inner beliefs and our outer behavior. Do we truly have free will when our choices are shaped by our own constructed reality? Or, are we slaves to our own biases, both conscious and unconscious, that limit our vision and prevent us from truly being “right”?

In contemporary philosophy, the idea of “free will” has long been a matter of debate. Perhaps the most famous proponent of this concept is Immanuel Kant, who argued that humans possess the ability to make choices which are not predetermined by any external determinants. On the other hand, French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, who was highly influenced by Kant's ideas, claimed that our environments and past experiences shape our decisions and render us “slaves” to our own subjectivity.

It can therefore be argued that when we make decisions and take action, our beliefs and values play a major role in determining our choices. Those beliefs and values, however, are based upon our own constructed reality and the conditions of our world. Our world may not always be “right,” and yet our decisions are still based upon what we believe and value in it. In this sense, our “world” and ourselves can be said to have a strong symbiotic relationship, whereby our beliefs and values shape the way we view and inhabit our world, and in turn, the world shapes how we act, think, and feel.

If we truly believe that our world is “right,” then we are influenced by the values and beliefs that sustain that world and our behavior and decisions then become reflections of these values. In such a scenario, it can be said that the man is “right” since he acts according to what he holds dear and true. This is not to say that these values are necessarily “right” in an absolute sense, but rather that they reflect the “rightness” of the man’s inner beliefs and outlook.

Thus, if one’s world is “right,” then it seems that the man will also be “right”—at least in the sense that the man’s behavior and decisions will reflect that he holds that world to be true and valuable. In other words, our inner beliefs and values shape the way we view and inhabit our world, and our decisions and actions come to reflect that “rightness” of our inner beliefs.

[Trotter]

6 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said:

If one’s world is right, then the man will be right is a thought-provoking statement that merits deep reflection. On the surface, it implies that the world is created by individuals and that the individual should be held responsible for their own actions. However, upon closer examination, this statement raises several questions. What is meant by “right”? Is it referring to moral or ethical standards? Does this mean that the world is a reflection of the individual’s actions or beliefs?

In essence, this statement suggests that the world is a product of the individual, and that the individual is ultimately responsible for their actions. To be “right” is to adhere to a moral or ethical code. This code is determined by the individual and their beliefs, and the world is a reflection of that individual’s choices. Therefore, if an individual chooses to act in accordance with their moral code, the world will be “right”, and the individual will be “right”.

This idea can be further explored by looking at the implications of this statement. If an individual’s world is deemed “right”, then the individual is expected to act in a certain way. This could be interpreted as a form of moral obligation, where an individual is expected to live according to their own moral code in order to maintain the integrity of the world. This could be seen as a form of self-governance, where the individual is responsible for the quality of their world.

This statement also implies that if the individual is “right”, the world will be “right”. This suggests that the individual’s actions have a direct impact on the world. This could be interpreted as an acknowledgment of the individual’s power to shape the world. It is up to the individual to choose to act in a manner that is in line with their moral code, and in doing so, they can create a “right” world.

Overall, if one’s world is right, then the man will be right is a statement that is full of implications and philosophical meanings. It suggests that the individual is ultimately responsible for the quality of their world, and that their actions have the power to shape the world. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to choose to act in accordance with their moral code in order to create a “right” world.

Fresh delivery of gummies?

[OtherwiseHappyinLife]

6 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said:

If one’s world is right, then the man will be right is a thought-provoking statement that merits deep reflection. On the surface, it implies that the world is created by individuals and that the individual should be held responsible for their own actions. However, upon closer examination, this statement raises several questions. What is meant by “right”? Is it referring to moral or ethical standards? Does this mean that the world is a reflection of the individual’s actions or beliefs?

In essence, this statement suggests that the world is a product of the individual, and that the individual is ultimately responsible for their actions. To be “right” is to adhere to a moral or ethical code. This code is determined by the individual and their beliefs, and the world is a reflection of that individual’s choices. Therefore, if an individual chooses to act in accordance with their moral code, the world will be “right”, and the individual will be “right”.

This idea can be further explored by looking at the implications of this statement. If an individual’s world is deemed “right”, then the individual is expected to act in a certain way. This could be interpreted as a form of moral obligation, where an individual is expected to live according to their own moral code in order to maintain the integrity of the world. This could be seen as a form of self-governance, where the individual is responsible for the quality of their world.

This statement also implies that if the individual is “right”, the world will be “right”. This suggests that the individual’s actions have a direct impact on the world. This could be interpreted as an acknowledgment of the individual’s power to shape the world. It is up to the individual to choose to act in a manner that is in line with their moral code, and in doing so, they can create a “right” world.

Overall, if one’s world is right, then the man will be right is a statement that is full of implications and philosophical meanings. It suggests that the individual is ultimately responsible for the quality of their world, and that their actions have the power to shape the world. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to choose to act in accordance with their moral code in order to create a “right” world.

What have you done with the font, you bastard! My eyes are beginning to cross

[Trotter]

Just now, Trotter said:

Fresh delivery of gummies?

Sorry meant edibles