PatsFanTX Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Wrong again. the human polls voted florida in because they didn't want a rematch. period. Wrong again numbnuts. The human poll voted Florida in because they played the toughest schedule in the nation and had only one loss. The "rematch" had absolutely nothing to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Rutgers would've been above florida at 12-0. there is no doubt in my mind. florida has been EXTREAMLY unimpressive all year. Mike-Hello Mike-Rutgers when they were UNDEFEATED were noit in front of Florida, as late as Nov 12, Rutgers last undefeated poll date. Tell me how Florida would have slipped with a stronger schedule and then teh SEC championship win. Man, you are just plain ignorant on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Mike-Hello Mike-Rutgers when they were UNDEFEATED were noit in front of Florida, as late as Nov 12, Rutgers last undefeated poll date. Tell me how Florida would have slipped with a stronger schedule and then teh SEC championship win. Man, you are just plain ignorant on this. Because if rutgers had gone 12-0 after being WVU and louisville they would have extended their lead over florida in the computers and would've been at least even in the human polls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Because if rutgers had gone 12-0 after being WVU and louisville they would have extended their lead over florida in the computers and would've been at least even in the human polls. Mikke YOU ARE WRONG-The computer takes into affect strngth of schedule. Florida closed with a stronger schedule than Rutgers. Their overall schedule strength was the best in the country. The "human polls" would have factored the same. How were people all of a sudden going to have an epiphany on Rutgers when they did not have it by Nov12 (when they were undefeated and just beat Louisville), and Florida had the remaining harder schedule? You are just WRONG WRONG WRONG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Because if rutgers had gone 12-0 after being WVU and louisville they would have extended their lead over florida in the computers and would've been at least even in the human polls. If Rutgers would have played in the SEC, they would have finished the year at 4-8 at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 If Rutgers would have played in the SEC, they would have finished the year at 4-8 at best. Typical hater bull****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 They were too scared to play louisville and they played some mediocore SEC teams that always beat up on each other. They wouldn't have made the game. Rutgers would have had 5-6 losses if they played Florida's schedule. The Big East is a joke. Florida had the #1 hardest schedule in the nation, yet you say they beat no one. As if Rutgers wouldn't have had their asses handed to them on a silver platter by LSU, Arkansas, Georgia, or Tennessee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Mikke YOU ARE WRONG-The computer takes into affect strngth of schedule. Florida closed with a stronger schedule than Rutgers. Their overall schedule strength was the best in the country. The "human polls" would have factored the same. How were people all of a sudden going to have an epiphany on Rutgers when they did not have it by Nov12 (when they were undefeated and just beat Louisville), and Florida had the remaining harder schedule? You are just WRONG WRONG WRONG. Beating WVU would've done more for Rutgers in the rankings then any of florida's wins later in the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Rutgers would have had 5-6 losses if they played Florida's schedule. The Big East is a joke. Florida had the #1 hardest schedule in the nation, yet you say they beat no one. As if Rutgers wouldn't have had their asses handed to them on a silver platter by LSU, Arkansas, Georgia, or Tennessee. Din''t WVU beat Georgia last year? Rutgers played WVU to triple OT. They more then proved they are on that level. Sorry haters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Beating WVU would've done more for Rutgers in the rankings then any of florida's wins later in the season. WHAT? Arkansas was #9 WVU #15. Which is the better win??? You cant be serious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Din''t WVU beat Georgia last year? Rutgers played WVU to triple OT. They more then proved they are on that level. Sorry haters. Syracuse took Iowa to overtime earlier this year. That more than proves that they are on the same level as Ohio St. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 WHAT? Arkansas was #9 WVU #15. Which is the better win??? You cant be serious All those SEC teams beat each other up and no of them impressed anyone. Florida is in the game because they got lucky and USC wasn't that good this year and the 2 best teams were in the big 10 and played. They don't belong on the same field as ohio state. All you need to know about the JOKE SEC that is that EVERY SEC COACH voted for florida. That conference is so amazingly overrated it's funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 All those SEC teams beat each other up and no of them impressed anyone. Florida is in the game because they got lucky and USC wasn't that good this year and the 2 best teams were in the big 10 and played. They don't belong on the same field as ohio state. All you need to know about the JOKE SEC that is that EVERY SEC COACH voted for florida. That conference is so amazingly overrated it's funny. Saying you are as dumb as dirt is an insult to dirt everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Saying you are as dumb as dirt is an insult to dirt everywhere. NICE you come back with an insult instead of a real argument. How typical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 NICE you come back with an insult instead of a real argument. How typical. You have no real argument. How do I come back to hearsay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 You have no real argument. How do I come back to hearsay?LOL @ YOU SAYING THAT I HAVE NO REAL ARGUMENT. Your argument: YOu'RE STUPID YOu"RE A DUMBASS SEC RULZ!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 LOL @ YOU SAYING THAT I HAVE NO REAL ARGUMENT. Your argument: YOu'RE STUPID YOu"RE A DUMBASS SEC RULZ!!!!!!!!!! Anyone that knows anything about college football agrees that the SEC is bar-none the toughest conference. I doubt you've seen an SEC game all year. Judging from your dumbass posts about the Jets and the SEC, my guess is that your rabbit ears aren't strong enough to pick up CBS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.