DaBrick Wall Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 The Angels are the luckiest ****ing piece of **** team I have ever seen in my life. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeebers Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 You are probably right. This Angels team only have the best record in the league, one of the best managers, play hard and play the right way. Real lucky indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBrick Wall Posted August 10, 2008 Author Share Posted August 10, 2008 WTF does "play the right way" mean? Their pythag record is 65-51; they are overachieving. And it's because of things like that...they get bouncers that become seeing eye singles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeebers Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 WTF does "play the right way" mean? Their pythag record is 65-51; they are overachieving. And it's because of things like that...they get bouncers that become seeing eye singles. This team plays as hard as anyone. Has an excellent bullpen, including a great closer. Their lineup is not shabby either. This team constantly pushes the boundaries, they're always taking the extra base and forcing other teams into mistakes. This team is "lucky" how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 This team plays as hard as anyone. Has an excellent bullpen, including a great closer. Their lineup is not shabby either. This team constantly pushes the boundaries, they're always taking the extra base and forcing other teams into mistakes. This team is "lucky" how? That's the only way to beat the Mighty Yankees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicBizkit87 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 um... overachieving? You said it all right there, now I know I will never take you serious anymore. How is a team that sweeps the Yankees, and sweeps the Boston Red Sox twice overachieving? They are just flat out the best team in the game right now, there is no way around it. They aren't in the World Series, I will be shocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBrick Wall Posted August 11, 2008 Author Share Posted August 11, 2008 um... overachieving? You said it all right there, now I know I will never take you serious anymore. How is a team that sweeps the Yankees, and sweeps the Boston Red Sox twice overachieving? They are just flat out the best team in the game right now, there is no way around it. They aren't in the World Series, I will be shocked. All I said was that their pythagorean record--for those of you who don't understand (derived from Runs scored [squared] / (Runs scored [squared] + runs allowed [squared]). This formula was designed to relate a team's runs scored and runs allowed to its won-lost record.) was MUCH better than it should be. Teams don't tend to over or under-perform their pythag record by this much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 The only numbers that matter in the end are these Angels 74 Wins 43 Losses. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 this is just a bad year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 There are some who say luck is the residue of design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBrick Wall Posted August 11, 2008 Author Share Posted August 11, 2008 um... overachieving? You said it all right there, now I know I will never take you serious anymore. How is a team that sweeps the Yankees, and sweeps the Boston Red Sox twice overachieving? They are just flat out the best team in the game right now, there is no way around it. They aren't in the World Series, I will be shocked. Furthermore, what I said was a fact. WHen you stop making ridiculous claims like Dan Giese is better than Edwar Ramirez, get back to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anskyruben Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Furthermore, what I said was a fact. WHen you stop making ridiculous claims like Dan Giese is better than Edwar Ramirez, get back to me. Edwar is a floating sack of crap right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.